& FREE Shipping. Details
Only 1 left in stock.
Sold by HOLLYWOOD AT HIGHLAND and Fulfilled by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
The Beatles (The White Al... has been added to your Cart
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: (u.s. pressing, swbo 101) out of print double vinyl gatefold lp record professionally graded - RECORD CONDITION: overall in excellent condition, lps have been tested and guaranteed to play without a skip, it has been professionally cleaned, high shine black luster, labels are in mint condition with no markings, no scratches, records play flat, light scuffs COVER CONDITION: excellent condition overall, front and back cover in excellent condition, strong legible spine has some wear, very light corner wear, cover is clean with light wear, some light ring wear SHIPPING: shipped direct from Amazon, new mobile fidelity record sleeves, new plastic sleeve protecting record cover, comes with original photos and fold-out sheet in near mint condition
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
  • The Beatles (The White Album)
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player

The Beatles (The White Album)

See all 57 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
$275.47 $19.95
$540.32 & FREE Shipping. Details Only 1 left in stock. Sold by HOLLYWOOD AT HIGHLAND and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Amazon's The Beatles Store


Image of album by The Beatles


Image of The Beatles


The Beatles Mono Vinyl Unboxing


"The story began in Harold Macmillan’s “never had it so good” ’50s Britain. It should be fiction: four teenagers with no more than eight O’Levels between them, running and biking and busing and busking all over Liverpool in search of new chords and old guitars and half-decent drum kit and any gig at all.
They were determined to amount to something – ... Read more in Amazon's The Beatles Store

Visit Amazon's The Beatles Store
for 315 albums, 59 photos, 14 videos, and 52 full streaming songs.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Check Out Our Turntable Store
    Need a new record player? Check out our turntable store for a great selection of turntables, needles, accessories, and more.

Frequently Bought Together

The Beatles (The White Album) + Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Price for both: $553.31

Buy the selected items together

Product Details

  • Vinyl
  • Number of Discs: 2
  • Label: Apple Records
  • ASIN: B00003JA7P
  • Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1,593 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #172,203 in Music (See Top 100 in Music)

Editorial Reviews

The Beatles (also known as The White Album) was released on November 25, 1968.

Customer Reviews

This is one of the best albums ever made.
L. Power
All I can really say is if you're a fan of this album and don't already have a copy, and even if you do, and you're on the fence about buying it - just get it.
J. Montgomery
Classic songs like "Back in the U.S.S.R.", "Dear Prudence", "While My Guitar Gently Weeps", "Blackbird", "Helter Skelter", etc.
Johnny Heering

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

582 of 633 people found the following review helpful By John Stodder on May 14, 2003
Format: Audio CD
There are a few albums from the rock era that I feel I've been in a relationship with since the first day I got them. "The Beatles" is one of those albums. I found it under my Christmas tree in 1968, and I've been engaged with it at some level ever since. It is not the best Beatles album, objectively; nor is it my favorite. But it has always compelled my attention.
At the time it came out, I was 12, but even then it was clear that we were no longer in Pepperland or on a Magical Mystery Tour. This album wasn't yet more "progress" toward some new musical form. Musically, it embraced values never before associated with the Beatles as I understood them: Parody, pastiche, rock and roll revivalism, music-hall nostalgia, avant-garde experimentation, political agitation, intimate confession, trivial nonsense. It is, simply, a series of highly personal statements from the three songwriters, coalescing around no particular theme other than the right to personal expression.
"The Beatles" is not, to me, "the sound of the Beatles breaking up." That's the storyline a lot of Beatle historians apply to this album. If they're basing this judgement on the fact that the individual songwriters' imprints are on each song, you'd have to argue that the breakup began much earlier, around the time of "Beatles for Sale" or "Help!" Lennon-McCartney were rarely a songwriting "team" in the sense of George and Ira Gershwin. Their partnership was always about strategy, i.e. how to ensure that third-rate songs would not be included on albums just for the sake of fairness. "The Beatles" instead simply shows the evolution of each of the three songwriters (on this album, George emerges dramatically) as they each embraced new musical ideas and applied their life experiences to their art.
Read more ›
41 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
159 of 174 people found the following review helpful By "gordon@ruraltel.net" on March 15, 2000
Format: Audio CD
To all the golden eared audiophiles who can hear all the differences in this 30th Anniversery reissue, I say, what a bunch of whooee. This is the EXACT SAME MASTER as the 1987 release. No difference...NADA. Please notice, the Amazon listing has been changed from "remastered" to "original recording." It's amazing how much psycology is at work when people listen. If they believe it's remastered, their ear will trick them into believing it sounds different. Don't believe it.
So, that means all of us Beatle fans have forked over thiry-some odd dollars for the exact same product that we had. The question is, Capital/EMI, why the H didn't you remaster this? The white album is one of the most poorly remastered discs in the Beatles catalog (but it's got some stiff competition, the first four albums for starters). It's unfathomable to me that Capital/EMI would ask Beatles fans to shell out that kind of money for an unimproved product, and a product that sorely needed improvement. What, we're supposed to be happy to pay over thirty dollars for ridiculous miniture artwork which you need a magnifying glass to read and see? Come on, Capital/EMI! That's highway robbery, and you know it! With all the money you've already made on the Beatles' catalog, this is a particular heinous crime.
So, Capital/EMI, what about actually remastering the Beatles catalog? They are only considered the greatest musical force of the last half of the 20th century. The Who's catalog has been remastered; the Byrds catalog has been remastered, even the Hollies catalog was wonderfully remastered for their box set (by YOU EMI! ). It seems a tragic, bitter irony that perhaps the most musical of all the artists of the 60s gets the shoddiest of digital remastering.
Read more ›
16 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
151 of 167 people found the following review helpful By Brian O'Marra on January 12, 2000
Format: Audio CD
The above rating is not for the quality of the Beatles' performances. The album rates up there with Sgt. Pepper, Revolver, Rubber Soul and Abbey Road.
Let me then explain why it deserves the rating. At the time of its initial release on vinyl, the music portrayed an encyclopedia of music styles: from hard rock (Helter Skelter), to blues (Yer Blues), to jazz (Honey Pie), to country (Rocky Raccoon), to Beach Boys surf (Back In The USSR).
Its cover was inspired by the white art of Yoko and individually numbered like works of art. In fact number 1 has recently turned up. Then in 1987, it was released on CD on two separate discs packaged together in a longbox.
Then later it was repackaged in a double CD clamshell which was the start of its downfall. It listed the songs for Disc One, and then Dics (sic) Two. As far as I am aware this gaffe still exists.
Then we come to this latest repackaging. Yes, it was a nice way to commemorate the 30th anniversary by presenting it in a mini album format complete with gatefold sleeve, poster, and four mini pictures of the Beatles. However, one begs the question: why wasn't it remastered?
Sgt. Pepper was to be remastered in mono for its 30th anniversary. That was pulled much to the fans displeasure. Then the execs at Apple didn't want to pass up on the White Album, so they simple dressed up the packaging, charged extra, and left the remastering circa 1987!
Why not put out the mono mix? Piggies, Blackbird, Helter Skelter, Don't Pass Me By have subtleties that would sound refreshing today.
In fact, Happiness is A Warm Gun in mono corrects a mixing error left in the stereo. The instrumental bridge actually had John's middle 8 sung over it. He actually sang that twice.
Read more ›
8 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Topic From this Discussion
White Album Remaster Too Good?
Of all the Beatles' remastered CDs, I feel that the clearest difference from the earlier CD release is shown with the 'White Album'. The sound simply shines, and makes a great record sound more full, dramatic and stunning than ever.
Aug 8, 2011 by Robert Bykowski |  See all 7 posts
Revolution 9
Love it, but it is a few minutes too long. I think it would have had more of a shock factor if it was a little shorter. Pretty far from the worst song on a Beatles record, far too interesting and unique. It is also one of the more mysterious and sinister momements on the album and essential to... Read More
Mar 9, 2007 by Dansa |  See all 30 posts
Beatle Remasters: Stereo vs. Mono
To enumerate all the differences between the mono & stereo versions of the first 10 albums would make for too long of a reply. Let me simplify it this way - if you want to hear the mix of the Beatles' albums the way the Beatles intended them to sound, you'll listen to the mono mixes. This is... Read More
Jul 5, 2009 by C. Saylors |  See all 20 posts
beatles remasters
The recent rerelease of Yellow Submarine previewed the remastered sound, including selections from Sgt. Pepper, Revolver, and the original movie songs (not the orchestral interludes.) It's pretty different. Some weird choices emerge, like the bassline seeming to get mixed way down in A Little... Read More
May 12, 2009 by Neal Allen |  See all 32 posts
Pick Your Single Disc White Album!
they should have made it a 3 sided album, and really blown everybodys mind and just put high pitched recordings on side 4 for your dogs to enjoy.or just have let George Harrison have the 4th side to put any songs he wanted to out as a pay back for all the times he did not get enough songs on the... Read More
Dec 10, 2013 by bob francais |  See all 31 posts
Manson and White Album Be the first to reply
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?