Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars One minute in history = the dichotomy of 19th-century America
On May 22, 1856, South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks used a walking stick to physically assault Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner while the man was seated at his desk on the Senate floor. All Sumner had been guilty of was speaking adamantly against slavery. Truly amazing is how accurately and succinctly this one incident represented the dichotomy of America at...
Published on August 8, 2010 by Corinne H. Smith

versus
3.0 out of 5 stars Examination of a Singular Event Falls Short
It is pretty much impossible to write about the immediate pre-Civil War years without mentioning the caning of Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner by South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks. That less than one minute attack is properly seen as one of a series of extraordinary events--the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Dred Scott Decision, John Brown's attack on Harper's...
Published 4 months ago by JLafayette


Most Helpful First | Newest First

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars One minute in history = the dichotomy of 19th-century America, August 8, 2010
By 
Corinne H. Smith (Lancaster County, PA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)   
This review is from: The Caning of Charles Sumner: Honor, Idealism, and the Origins of the Civil War (Witness to History) (Hardcover)
On May 22, 1856, South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks used a walking stick to physically assault Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner while the man was seated at his desk on the Senate floor. All Sumner had been guilty of was speaking adamantly against slavery. Truly amazing is how accurately and succinctly this one incident represented the dichotomy of America at the time. In Sumner and Brooks, we can see North vs. South, Republican vs. Democrat, Senate vs. House, abolitionism vs. slavery, law vs. honor, and word vs. action. That singular moment in Washington was a key indication that the United States was clearly headed for an official split. The Civil War was inevitable.

Professor Hoffer offers analysis of the assault and places it into the context of America's history, politics, and culture. This slim volume is easy to read but is hardly thin on content. Even readers who are not necessarily Civil War aficionados will learn much here. Beyond its own timetable, the text explains much about who we are as Americans. It is highly recommended for anyone interested in American history, the Civil War, or even merely the origins of today's red and blue states. And if you think the 21st-century political scene has become particularly tumultuous, you'll discover that it's nothing compared to what was happening in the United States in the 1800s.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 6 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A close study of a violent event in the United States Congress, May 14, 2010
The Caning of Charles Sumner: Honor, Idealism, and the Origins of the Civil War is a close study of a violent event in the United States Congress that foreshadowed and exemplified the American Civil War. Charles Sumner, an abolitionist and skilled speaker, was sitting at his Senate desk on May 22, 1856 when Democratic Congressman Preston S. Brookes struck him on the head with a gutta-percha walking stick. Brookes continued to savagely beat Sumner in front of witnesses, who intervened only after Sumner had fallen unconscious and Brookes appeared determined to beat Sumner to death. Sumner had provoked Brookes' ire by speaking vividly about the abhorrence of slavery, an act seen as dishonoring both the South and Brookes' relative, Senator Andrew P. Butler. The shocking violence in America's legislative body - and the subsequent slap on the wrist Brookes received for perpetrating it - has volumes to reveal about the North-South cultural divide and the tense political climate of the era. An extraordinary and valuable study of what these events of history reveal not only about America of the past, but also America of today, The Caning of Charles Sumner is highly recommended especially for college library collections and American Civil War shelves.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars Examination of a Singular Event Falls Short, March 1, 2014
It is pretty much impossible to write about the immediate pre-Civil War years without mentioning the caning of Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner by South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks. That less than one minute attack is properly seen as one of a series of extraordinary events--the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Dred Scott Decision, John Brown's attack on Harper's Ferry, and the Election of Abraham Lincoln--that precipitated the war.

Undoubtedly the Sumner caning is important, if only because it underlined for the North the feeling that the South had become violently irrational on the topic of slavery, while Southerners felt that the Sumner speech precipitating the attack was only the most recent sign that Northerners really did despise the South and would be more than happy to inspire slave rebellions.

The problem with this book is that it is, in the end, more of a rhetorical argument than history. I continuously felt in reading it that I was sitting in a university auditorium listening to the musings of a guest lecturer. Nothing wrong with that, of course. But as scholarship, the book never really goes beyond that surface level. The author in his footnotes displays a familiarity with the standard historical works on the period, but uses no archival resources at all. As a result we get the standard snapshot profiles of Sumner and Brooks, with little beneath the surface.

There are also references that entirely slip away. The author at one point says "All of the papers examined for this study issued an editorial response" (p. 87) to the Sumner caning. But he never tells us what newspapers he is referring to, nor what they said.

In the end, I would not recommend this book for anyone who knows little about the Sumner caning. And even for those who know a lot, I would say it is a work of only transitory value.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

Details

The Caning of Charles Sumner: Honor, Idealism, and the Origins of the Civil War (Witness to History)
Used & New from: $44.94
Add to wishlist See buying options
Search these reviews only
Rate and Discover Movies
Send us feedback How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you? Let us know here.