Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
Network researcher Ron Burt has identified two types of activities that create value in small-world networks: brokerage and closure.
Brokerage is about developing the weak ties: building bridges and relationships between clusters. Brokers are in a position to see the differences between groups, to cross-pollinate ideas, and to develop the differences into new ideas and opportunities.
Closure is about developing the strong ties: building alignment, trust, reputation and community within the clusters. Trust-builders are in a position to understand the deep connections that bond the people together and give them common identity and purpose.
These two kinds of activity, bridging and trust-building, demonstrate two very different ways that people and organizations can bring value to a network: Bridging leads to innovation and trust-building leads to group performance. The value that comes from these activities is known as social capital. Like every other form of capital, social capital represents stored value—in this case, relationship value—that can be translated into meaningful and tangible benefits. The power of an individual node in any network can be considered along three dimensions: Degree, closeness and betweenness.
Degree is the number of connections a node has to other nodes; for example the number of people in your family, or on your team at work, or the number of “friends” attached to your Facebook account. For an organization it could be the number of sales affiliates or business partners.
The value of a high degree is potential: the potential to connect and interact with a great number of other nodes in the network.
Closeness is a measure of how easily a node can connect with other nodes. For example you are probably very close to your team at work because it’s easy to connect to them: you can contact any person at any time. But you might be further away from other people in your company. Some you might be able to catch by walking down the hall or popping into their office, while to see others you might need an appointment, or you might need to be introduced by a mutual acquaintance. Anyone who has tried to make a connection on LinkedIn knows that the greater the distance, the harder it is to make a connection.
The value of closeness is ease of connection: The shorter the distance between you and other nodes, the fewer network “hops” you need to make, the easier it is for you to make connections when you need to.
Betweenness indicates the degree to which a node forms a bridge or critical link between other nodes. For example, many executives are protected from distractions by executive assistants or secretaries who act as gatekeepers, who control access to the executive’s time and attention.
The value of betweenness is the power you have to block or grant access to others. The more nodes that depend on you to make connections for them, the greater your potential value to them and thus the greater your power.
Thus, the most powerful person or organization in any network is one that has a high number of potential connections, all of which are relatively close and thus easily accessible, while at the same time enjoying a position within the network such that it can choose to block or grant access to other nodes.
One of the most thought-out books on the market. I've read a ton of books on social media and digital transformation, but this book is one that I enjoyed the most. Read morePublished 9 months ago by Ekaterina Walter
The new organization is a network, not a hierarchy. Great argument and well written.Published 14 months ago by Jurgen Appelo
I am not sure if you have to have MBA first to appreciate this book, it's fullness and novelty, and applicability. I did an MBA few years ago, and I read many business books. Read morePublished 16 months ago by Branka
A rational approach to a issue relevant to the survival of small and large companies. Communications are more available in today's generation than in your father's life time. Read morePublished 16 months ago by R. R. Hixson
I have a lot of things to do in my companies. Now I believe that connected companies will make our world much better.Published 19 months ago by Anton
I expected more from this book. The topic is more then interesting and it screams for an action book about how to create and manage a connected company. Read morePublished on November 3, 2013 by mvwijland
Extremely well written. I could not put this down. The book itself is well organised with each chapter being very short. The examples are very interesting. Read morePublished on November 3, 2013 by C K Venkatraman
Dave Gray turns organization thinking upside down when you put the customer at the center of the equation. Read morePublished on October 27, 2013 by Bernie G
Great and easy to read book.
Relevant to what is happening TODAY.
Awesome examples and applicable to any type of business, company, industry, etc.