or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

The Design of Life: Discovering Signs of Intelligence In Biological Systems [Hardcover]

William A. Dembski , Jonathan Wells
3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (100 customer reviews)

List Price: $35.00
Price: $22.96 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $12.04 (34%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 12 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Friday, June 21? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Image
Save on Popular Books This Summer
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more.

Book Description

November 19, 2007
"The illusion of purpose is so powerful," writes Richard Dawkins, "that biologists themselves use the assumption of good design as a working tool." As an ardent proponent of Darwinian evolution, Dawkins imagines that all design in biology is merely an illusion. By contrast, this book shows that biologists use the assumption of design with success precisely because design in biology is not an illusion but real. In this book, William Dembski and Jonathan Wells present a compelling scientific case for the intelligent design of biological systems. Their laser-like analysis, clear explanations, and brilliant analogies will captivate every reader, whether trained scientist or curious layperson. Intelligent design (ID), as the study of patterns in nature best explained by intelligence, is already accepted in many special sciences. Archeology, forensics, and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) all belong to ID in this broad sense. These sciences, however, are uncontroversial because any intelligence there could be an "evolved" intelligence. In biology, by contrast, intelligent design is highly controversial because any intelligence there would be an "unevolved" intelligence - it would not be the product of purely material evolutionary processes. Thus, to convinced materialists like Richard Dawkins, who dogmatically accept Darwinian orthodoxy, this book comes as a shot across the bow. Scientists who support the intelligent design of biological systems are routinely held up to ridicule, stripped of their status, denied tenure, and driven from their posts. Why? They do not agree that the universe, life, and the human mind are the accidental outworking of purely material forces. And why don't they agree? Because the evidence of science shows otherwise. This book presents that evidence clearly and cogently. Written for the general reader, it will quickly enter the national conversation. In The Design of Life, Dembski and Wells make the most powerful and comprehensive case to date for the intelligent design of life. This is the book that the promoters of unintelligent evolution do NOT want you to read.

Frequently Bought Together

The Design of Life: Discovering Signs of Intelligence In Biological Systems + The Myth of Junk DNA + Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design
Price for all three: $51.24

Some of these items ship sooner than the others.

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

Review

The Design of Life, which is both a sequel to Of Pandas and People (Second Edition, 1993), and a stand alone book in its own right, brilliantly lays out all the main lines of evidence and argument in the current dispute between the Darwinists and the growing body of Intelligent Design theorists. It not only updates the arguments presented in Pandas but explains the exciting developments in the new science of intelligent design that have occurred since the early 1990s. Dembski and Wells, who themselves are among the leading practitioners of the new science, write in a refreshingly carefully reasoned, lucid and direct style, pulling no punches when it comes to answering the criticisms of their leading Darwinist opponents including Richard Dawkins and Kenneth Miller, among many others. They make a formidable case that the indications of design seen everywhere in nature at all levels of organization (and acknowledged by the Darwinists) bespeak real and not just apparent design. Nowhere is this more evident than in the powerful new chapters on irreducible complexity (Chapter 6) building on the ground breaking work of Michael Behe in Darwin's Black Box, 1996, and specified complexity (Chapter 7) based on Dembski's many contributions to information theory as it relates to design (e.g., The Design Inference, 1998, and No Free Lunch, 2002). Each of the book's eight chapters is thoroughly documented with many explanatory footnotes and references to the pertinent technical literature. These detailed notes as well as the supplemental General Notes contained on the accompanying CD provide interested laypersons, university students, and working scientists with a reliable guide to the highest levels of scientific discussion in the often contentious dispute between Darwinists and intelligent design proponents. Appended to each chapter is a list of 10 discussion questions keyed to the order of presentation of the topics in the chapter and to the General Notes. If I were still involved in university teaching I would enthusiastically adopt The Design of Life as a required text in courses in evolution and the origin of life and in graduate seminars on information theory and molecular biology, and use it as a supplement in introductory biology classes. Dembski and Wells argue calmly and convincingly that intelligent design theory is empirically testable (in spite of Darwinists' shrill protests to the contrary) by indicating precisely what it would take to refute the theory, namely a clear demonstration that systems exhibiting irreducible complexity with specified complexity can in fact arise spontaneously by purely material processes. Their discussion takes intelligent design theory far beyond what we were able to accomplish when we wrote Pandas. I salute Dembski and Wells for a most worthy addition to the already powerful case that intelligent design deserves a seat at the academic table in university biology courses and with all scientists working to unlock the mystery of life's origin. --Dean Kenyon, Emeritus Professor of Biology, San Franciso State University

When future intellectual historians list the books that toppled Darwin's theory, THE DESIGN OF LIFE will be at the top. --Michael Behe, biochemist, Lehigh University

The Design of Life gives all interested parties in the debate over biological origins the hard scientific evidence they need to assess the true state of Darwin s theory and of the theory of intelligent design. But it does much more: it carefully fosters the attitude of open inquiry that science needs not only to thrive but also to avoid becoming the plaything of special interests. The authors, William Dembski and Jonathan Wells, are to be commended for writing a sparklingly clear book that empowers readers to navigate the captivating and controversial waters of biological origins. --William Harris, biologist, University of South Dakota

Book Description

"The illusion of purpose is so powerful," writes Richard Dawkins, "that biologists themselves use the assumption of good design as a working tool." As an ardent proponent of Darwinian evolution, Dawkins imagines that all design in biology is merely an illusion. By contrast, this book shows that biologists use the assumption of design with success precisely because design in biology is not an illusion but real. In this book, William Dembski and Jonathan Wells present a compelling scientific case for the intelligent design of biological systems. Their laser-like analysis, clear explanations, and brilliant analogies will captivate every reader, whether trained scientist or curious layperson. Intelligent design (ID), as the study of patterns in nature best explained by intelligence, is already accepted in many special sciences. Archeology, forensics, and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) all belong to ID in this broad sense. These sciences, however, are uncontroversial because any intelligence there could be an "evolved" intelligence. In biology, by contrast, intelligent design is highly controversial because any intelligence there would be an "unevolved" intelligence - it would not be the product of purely material evolutionary processes. Thus, to convinced materialists like Richard Dawkins, who dogmatically accept Darwinian orthodoxy, this book comes as a shot across the bow. Scientists who support the intelligent design of biological systems are routinely held up to ridicule, stripped of their status, denied tenure, and driven from their posts. Why? They do not agree that the universe, life, and the human mind are the accidental outworking of purely material forces. And why don't they agree? Because the evidence of science shows otherwise. This book presents that evidence clearly and cogently. Written for the general reader, it will quickly enter the national conversation. In The Design of Life, Dembski and Wells make the most powerful and comprehensive case to date for the intelligent design of life. This is the book that the promoters of unintelligent evolution do NOT want you to read.


Product Details

  • Hardcover: 401 pages
  • Publisher: Foundation for Thought and Ethics; 1st edition (November 19, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0980021308
  • ISBN-13: 978-0980021301
  • Product Dimensions: 7.5 x 1.1 x 9.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (100 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #486,263 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

A mathematician and philosopher, William A. Dembski is Research Professor in Philosophy at Southwestern Seminary in Ft. Worth, where he directs its Center for Cultural Engagement. He is also a senior fellow with Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture in Seattle. Previously he was the Carl F. H. Henry Professor of Theology and Science at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, where he founded its Center for Theology and Science. Before that he was Associate Research Professor in the Conceptual Foundations of Science at Baylor University, where he headed the first intelligent design think-tank at a major research university: The Michael Polanyi Center.

Dr. Dembski has taught at Northwestern University, the University of Notre Dame, and the University of Dallas. He has done postdoctoral work in mathematics at MIT, in physics at the University of Chicago, and in computer science at Princeton University. A graduate of the University of Illinois at Chicago where he earned a B.A. in psychology, an M.S. in statistics, and a Ph.D. in philosophy, he also received a doctorate in mathematics from the University of Chicago in 1988 and a master of divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary in 1996. He has held National Science Foundation graduate and postdoctoral fellowships.

Dr. Dembski has published articles in mathematics, engineering, philosophy, and theology journals and is the author/editor of more than a dozen books. In The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities (Cambridge University Press, 1998), he examines the design argument in a post-Darwinian context and analyzes the connections linking chance, probability, and intelligent causation. The sequel to The Design Inference appeared with Rowman & Littlefield in 2002 and critiques Darwinian and other naturalistic accounts of evolution. It is titled No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Dr. Dembski has edited several influential anthologies, including Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing (ISI, 2004) and Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA (Cambridge University Press, 2004, co-edited with Michael Ruse). His newest book, The End of Christianity, differs markedly from his others, attempting to understand how the Fall of humanity can be real in light of modern science.

As interest in intelligent design has grown in the wider culture, Dr. Dembski has assumed the role of public intellectual. In addition to lecturing around the world at colleges and universities, he is frequently interviewed on the radio and television. His work has been cited in numerous newspaper and magazine articles, including three front page stories in the New York Times as well as the August 15, 2005 Time magazine cover story on intelligent design. He has appeared on the BBC, NPR (Diane Rehm, etc.), PBS (Inside the Law with Jack Ford; Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson), CSPAN2, CNN, Fox News, ABC Nightline, and the Daily Show with Jon Stewart.

[Photo by Laszlo Bencze]

Customer Reviews

I wasted valuable time reading this book to the bitter end. BME  |  9 reviewers made a similar statement
Not only is intelligent design creationism unscientific, it even makes bad theology. Moridin  |  8 reviewers made a similar statement
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
607 of 731 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Hard to Ignore Flaws December 20, 2007
Format:Hardcover
Haven been given this book, I approached it with a genuinely open mind. However with a basic science education the material feels to be really going out on a limb, ignoring the vast scientific research and evidence that stands in contrast. If anything this book reads as an op-ed and not a science book, or worse religious propaganda masquerading as science. This motivated me to look a bit deeper into the authors Dembski and Wells, and what I found confirmed my suspicions: these guys are big Intelligent Design proponents and Discovery Institute fellows and generally discredited "scientists." The agenda of this institute is to promote creationism in schools and displace the Theory of Evolution and their strategy is to create an air of scientific legitimacy when there isn't any. Now I can honestly say that I think this book is another tool in that dishonest strategy; a one-sided misleading propaganda piece pretending to be scientific, bypassing the normal peer-reviewed scientific channels, feed directly to the ill-informed public. Shame on them for regressing our species.
Was this review helpful to you?
730 of 880 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Fallacious December 20, 2007
Format:Hardcover
Well written, but ultimately fallacious. Keeps arguing the same old arguments that have been completely refuted time and again. This time he sprinkles cherry picked scientific findings on top to try and make it seem more legitimate. There is no serious ID/Evolution debate outside of the political sphere, and this book (like most of the ID movement) spends most of its time trying to make it seem like there is. Don't buy this book.
Was this review helpful to you?
1,388 of 1,677 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars This is creationism., not science. December 20, 2007
Format:Hardcover
This book's entire foundation is flawed. ID's argument regarding irreducible complexity in biological systems falls flat, time and again, whenever the details of the system are looked into. This book argues that Intelligent Design can be refuted only if scientists can show that irreducibly complex systems can arise spontaneously through "random chance". However, so-called irreducibly complex structures and systems turn out to be nothing of the sort. Scientists have shown, time and time again, how biological systems co-opt genes and proteins for new tasks. This book also takes a very simplistic (and inaccurate) view of how evolution works to sculpt biological systems. Intelligent design has been shown, time and time again, to be nothing more than religious doctrine, creationism wrapped up in a new (not-so) shiny package. It is not science. It does not explain biological phenomena. Thus this book is not about science. And it explains nothing. If you are a proponent of ID then I guess this book will tell you what you want to hear. If you are looking for a truthful, scientific account of biology and evolution, you need to look elsewhere.
Was this review helpful to you?
1,032 of 1,246 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Poor Creationist Propaganda December 8, 2007
By Moridin
Format:Hardcover
The Design of Life is just the next stage in the intelligent design creationists agenda to replace scientific knowledge with what they call "Theistic Realism". They commit the same fallacy as older versions of this book (Of Pandas of People), producing little more than superstitious based pseudoscience. Philosopher Barbra Forrest and Biologist Paul Gross has made an extensive study on these creationists, which can be found in the book Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design.

Even devout Christians has expressed considerable criticism of the intelligent design creationism, such as Ken Miller in Finding Darwin's God: A Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution (P.S.) and Francis Collins in The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief.

"The Design of Life" perpetuates the same myths as the young earth creationists did in the 70's and 80's, only now it has been dressed up in a cheap tuxedo.

Not only is intelligent design creationism unscientific, it even makes bad theology. 98% of the species that has ever lived on this planet has gone extinct. This means that, if intelligent design creationism is correct, that the designer is a moron. First, he created that species and, whoops, it went extinct. Then he created another, and whoops, it went extinct.

After reading this book and actually bothering to look up the relevant scientific data, I feel betrayed, both on a scientific and theological level.
... Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
661 of 797 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars A sequel to Pandas and People says it all December 20, 2007
By SJN
Format:Hardcover
Once again, this is not science. It is little more than quasi-theological propaganda. Dembski is not only behind the times as to the actual work being done in the biological sciences, he cherry picks what he does use to to create misleading "gaps". The idea of irreducable complexity deliberately misunderstands the development of function. The certainty here is irreducable drivel on Dembski's part.
Was this review helpful to you?
472 of 568 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Theology Masked as Pseudoscience December 20, 2007
Format:Hardcover
I will confess that I have not yet finished reading this book. Being interested in paleoanthropology and paleontology I first turned to the sections in the book relevant to those fields. Given the hype built up for Dembski and Wells' critique of the reptile/mammal transition and their critique of the relationship between artiodactyls and whales I was hoping for a very thorough discussion of both those issues. To my disappointment, their critique displayed no knowledge of either subject. Their knowledge of the relevant paleontological finds is laughable. Even worse, they display no knowledge of the relevant skeletal changes in each of those lineages. One doubts they know a dentary from a surangular, or a double pulley astragalus from a lumbar vertebrae. They also display a profound lack of knowledge concerning bone growth and development which leads them, for example, to, mistakenly, assert that we do not have any knowledge of the mechanisms whereby the reptilian jaw could be converted to a mammalian jaw. Their discussion of the evolution of whales is even worse and lacks any mention of the many fossils that reach back and link whales to their artiodactyl ancestors (and of course there is no discussion of the changes in skeletal morphology demonstrated by the whole range of fossils) . Even as I write a new fossil has been discovered which provides further proof.

Their discussion of genetics is equally bad. For example, based on the fact that Mendel discovered that traits are transmitted in a particulate fashion, Dembski and Wells argue that Mendelian genetics preclude evolution!
... Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars No wonder Darwin worshippers hate this book...
...there's more science in this well-documented book than there is in the usual Darwinist origin of life works that are full of speculation, handwaving and wishful thinking; oh... Read more
Published 3 months ago by RexTugwell
1.0 out of 5 stars What about Logic?
The foundation of this book - Intelligent Design (ID) is not logically tenable and this book itself is an exercise in obscuring that fact. Read more
Published 6 months ago by R.R. Edwards
1.0 out of 5 stars Just wow... I was going to write a paragraph, but ended up with a...
I have not read this horrific book, The Design of Life, nor do I plan to consider ever giving money to the authors, Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon. Read more
Published 8 months ago by Noah Rosenblatt
1.0 out of 5 stars Urinating on empirical science and critical thinking.
This is not a scientifically sound book on life sciences, rather religiously motivated propaganda aimed at polluting young minds and directing them away from critical thinking... Read more
Published 11 months ago by greygraygrau
5.0 out of 5 stars The Design of Life
The book is well written. The authors demonstrate a breadth of knowledge in their respective fields. Read more
Published 16 months ago by R.S. Anderson
1.0 out of 5 stars Of Shams And Fictions
This book is an updated version of 'Of Pandas And People', the creationist handbook so thoroughly discredited in the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial. Read more
Published 19 months ago by John D. Muir
1.0 out of 5 stars Not scientists
Scientists look at evidence and propose a hypothesis. They then test it over and over to gauge its validity and eventually come to a conclusion that will be tested over and over... Read more
Published 20 months ago by grumpy_otter
1.0 out of 5 stars Science is for people without Faith
This book is very well written & sounds very convincing all the while being complete scientific hokum. It should seriously be in the science fiction section. Read more
Published on July 27, 2010 by Matthew Lane
1.0 out of 5 stars One long argument from ignorance
Why write one more review of Dembski and Well's sleazy rant? Hasn't everything been said about these 339 pages of nothing? Read more
Published on June 21, 2010 by Marc Andre Lachance
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Arguments
Dembski and Wells provide some food for thought to challenge the conventional wisdom regarding evolution. Perhaps the best chapter is the one dealing with probabilities. Read more
Published on June 4, 2010 by Jason Chamberlain
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews


Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Forums

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Topic From this Discussion
Amazon stacks the deck?
I'll certainly concur that Kwok's review was nothing but unadulterated pablum. How did he respond to my assertion that he did not read the book prior to his review? His pretentiously lame answer is that he initiated a discussion thread concerning the authors' eschewing the subject of mass... Read more
Feb 1, 2008 by Mindy |  See all 2 posts
Why Klingon Cosmology Is a Better Explanation of Origins Than...
John,

It's good to see this thread appear. I hope it stimulates real discussion.

I have, however, one reservation. "Intellectual pornography" is not the term i would apply. "Pornography" is generally a private matter and keeps certain people off the streets. ... Read more
Feb 10, 2008 by Stephen A. Haines |  See all 11 posts
Have never bought an ID book previously, but ...
--I happen to be an ID skeptic, though not presumptively so, but I see a set of serious issues that need to be addressed and I additionally, though a skeptic, believe at least some aspects of the ID hypothesis, as formulated by Behe and others, does in fact reflect responsible science, in terms... Read more
Dec 29, 2007 by ID Critic |  See all 119 posts
Dembski and Wells' intellectual dishonesty
I read Perakh's article! (I am a subsciber to TalkReason.) He's damn right in exposing Dumbski as a fraud!
Jan 4, 2008 by G. Coppens |  See all 4 posts
"Cambrian Explosion" or "Cambrian Slow Fuse"
Good Post John!
I had a Amazon forum running that was called "Can Creationists Stick to One Subject, The Cambrian Explosion?" We never had a serious challenge presented about
the Cambrian, and the IDiot creationist's who did try to participate rapidly degenerated to posting irrelevant... Read more
Feb 6, 2008 by Stephen Marley |  See all 4 posts
Iv ya dOnt nO hauoo 2 rite rite 'baut Ivalooshun, dOnt eben trY oar... Be the first to reply
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 






Look for Similar Items by Category