Buy New
$22.11
Qty:1
  • List Price: $24.00
  • Save: $1.89 (8%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
Trade in your item
Get a $7.50
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Doctrine Of Double Effect: Philosophers Debate a Controversial Moral Principle Paperback – April 28, 2001


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$22.11
$21.30 $22.10

Frequently Bought Together

The Doctrine Of Double Effect: Philosophers Debate a Controversial Moral Principle + Contractarianism / Contractualism + Justice And Care: Essential Readings In Feminist Ethics
Price for all three: $90.84

Buy the selected items together

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Paperback: 326 pages
  • Publisher: University of Notre Dame Press; 1st Edition edition (April 28, 2001)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0268008973
  • ISBN-13: 978-0268008970
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 5.9 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,994,817 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful By John M. Collins on February 10, 2002
Format: Paperback
Anyone who is interested in contemporary academic moral theory should own this book. The Doctrine of Double Effect states that it may be morally permissible to do something harmful to some people, in order to secure a greater good for others, but only if the foreseeable harm is unintended (i.e., you could think of it as a "side effect" of the action). For example, some draw a distinction in warfare between strategic bombing (in which military installations, factories, bridges and the like are targeted) and terror bombing (in which civilians, hospitals, schools and the like are targeted). As bombs often hit things that aren't targets, strategic bombers can foresee that they will hit some kindergartens and private homes. Yet there seems to be a moral difference between those who kill civilians in war as a side effect of carrying on their warfare, and those who intend the deaths of these civilians, as a necessary means to what they hope to accomplish.
This volume contains 19 essays, some of which defend and some of which criticize the doctrine. Paul Woodward has done an excellent job of selecting the most important essays on this subject, which is one that is central to contemporary moral philosophy.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Search