The Edge of Evolution and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading The Edge of Evolution on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism [Bargain Price] [Hardcover]

Michael J. Behe
3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (131 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


This is a bargain book and quantities are limited. Bargain books are new but could include a small mark from the publisher and an Amazon.com price sticker identifying them as such. See details.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $10.38  
Hardcover $22.50  
Hardcover, Bargain Price, June 5, 2007 --  
Paperback $12.69  
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged $18.99  
Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged $20.95 or Free with Audible 30-day free trial
Image
Save on Popular Books This Summer
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more.

Book Description

June 5, 2007
Michael J. Behe launched the intelligent design movement with his first book, Darwin's Black Box, by demonstrating that Darwinism could not account for the complexity of biochemistry. Now he takes a giant leap forward. In The Edge of Evolution, Behe uses astounding new findings from the genetics revolution to show that Darwinism is nowhere near as powerful as most people believe. Genetic analysis of malaria, E. coli, and the HIV virus over tens of thousands of generations, not to mention analysis of the entire history of the genetic struggle between them and "us" (humans), make it possible for the first time to determine the precise rates, and likelihood, of random mutations of varying kinds. We now know, as never before, what Darwinism can and cannot accomplish. The answers turn conventional science on its head and are certain to be hotly debated by millions. After The Edge of Evolution, life in the universe will never look the same.
--This text refers to the MP3 CD edition.

Special Offers and Product Promotions



Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

With his first book, Darwin's Black Box, Behe, a professor of biology at Lehigh University, helped define the controversial intelligent design movement with his concept of "irreducible complexity." Now he attempts to extend his analysis and define what evolution is capable of doing and what is beyond its scope. Behe strongly asserts, to the likely chagrin of young earth creationists, that the earth is billions of years old and that the concept of common descent is correct. But beginning with a look at malaria and the sickle cell response in humans, Behe argues that genetic mutation results in only clumsy solutions to selective pressures. He goes on to conclude that the statistical possibility of certain evolutionary changes taking place is virtually nil. Although Behe writes with passion and clarity, his calculations of probability ignore biologists' rejection of the premise that evolution has been working toward producing any particular end product. Furthermore, he repeatedly refers to the shortcomings of "Darwin's theory-the power of natural selection coupled to random mutation," but current biological theory encompasses far more than this simplistic view. Most important, Behe reaches the controversial conclusion that the workings of an intelligent designer is the only reasonable alternative to evolution, even without affirmative evidence in its favor.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Review

"With this book, Michael Behe shows that he is truly an independent thinker of the first order. He carefully examines the data of evolution, along the way making an argument for universal common descent that will make him no friends among young-earth creationists, and draws in new facts, especially the data on malaria, that have not been part of the public debate at all up to now. This book will take the intelligent design debate into new territory and represents a unique contribution to the longstanding question of philosophy: Can observation of the physical world guide our thinking about religious questions?"

-- Professor David Snoke, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh

"In The Edge of Evolution Michael Behe carefully assesses the evidence of what Darwin's mechanism of random mutation and selection can achieve in well documented cases, and shows that even in those cases that maximize its power as a creative force it has only been able to generate very trivial examples of evolutionary change. Could such an apparently impotent and mindless force really have built the sophisticated molecular devices found throughout nature? The answer, he insists, is no. The only common-sense explanation is intelligent design."

-- Michael Denton, M.D., Ph.D., author of Nature's Destiny

"In crystal-clear prose Behe systematically shreds the central dogma of atheistic science, the doctrine of the random universe. This book, like the natural phenomena it so elegantly describes, shows the unmistakable signs of a very deep intelligence at work."

-- JEffrey M. Schwartz, M.D., Research Psychiatrist, UCLA, and author of The Mind & The Brain

"Until the past decade and the genomics revolution, Darwin's theory rested on indirect evidence and reasonable speculation. Now, however, we have begun to scratch the surface of direct evidence, of which this book offers the best possible treatment. Though many critics won't want to admit it, The Edge of Evolution is very balanced, careful, ¬and devastating. A tremendously important book."

-- Dr. Philip Skell, Evan Pugh Professor of Chemistry, Emeritus, at Pennsylvania State University, and member of the National Academy of Sciences

"With this book, Michael Behe shows that he is truly an independent thinker of the first order. In a day when the media present all issues in the football metaphor as two teams fighting, the intelligent design debate is presented simplistically as authors who are lapdogs for young-earth creationists versus evolutionists who are lapdogs for atheists. Michael Behe is no lapdog. He carefully examines the data of evolution, along the way making an argument for universal common descent that will make him no friends among young-earth creationists, and draws in new facts, especially the data on malaria, that have not been part of the public debate at all up to now. This book will take the intelligent design debate into new territory and represents a unique contribution on the longstanding question of philosophy: can observation of the physical world guide our thinking about religious questions?"

- Professor David Snoke, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh

"Until the past decade and the genomics revolution, Darwin's theory rested on indirect evidence and reasonable speculation. Now, however, we have begun to scratch the surface of direct evidence, of which this book offers the best possible treatment. Though many critics won't want to admit it, The Edge of Evolution is very balanced, careful, and devastating. A tremendously important book."

-- Dr. Philip Skell, Evan Pugh Professor of Chemistry, Emeritus, at Pennsylvania State University, and member of the National Academy of Sciences --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.


Product Details

  • Hardcover: 336 pages
  • Publisher: Free Press; 1 edition (June 5, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0743296206
  • ASIN: B0012F2OJW
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.3 x 1.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (131 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #450,010 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

I am Professor of Biological Sciences at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. I received my Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the University of Pennsylvania in 1978. My current research involves delineation of design and natural selection in protein structures. In addition to teaching and research I work as a senior fellow with the Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture.

In addition to publishing over 35 articles in refereed biochemical journals, I have also written editorial features in Boston Review, American Spectator, and The New York Times. My book, Darwin's Black Box, discusses the implications for neo-Darwinism of what I call "irreducibly complex" biochemical systems and has sold over 250,000 copies. The book was internationally reviewed in over one hundred publications and recently named by National Review and World magazine as one of the 100 most important books of the 20th century.

I have presented and debated my work at major universities throughout North America and England.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
205 of 268 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Read it with an open mind. June 12, 2007
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Just as a massive star bends light, so emotion warps thought when we approach the question of origins. An eminent professor who takes the wrong position on this subject can lose tenure. A less eminent researcher may lose his job. Depite his forty-some peer-reviewed articles and a tenured faculty position, and the careful, measured tone in which he writes, Michael Behe will be called an "ID-iot," his honesty disputed, and anyone who agrees with him dismissed as an ignorant, red-neck hick who can barely muster the cognitive powers of a good high school student.

In such an environment (and if you doubt my appraisal, read some of the reviews below), it takes conscious intent to ignore manipulative appeals to the "argument from sociology" and attend to substance.

For the record, Behe is not an "ID-iot." He is a sharp and thoughtful biologist who doesn't think evolution can work on its own. In this book he argues for common descent, but argues that naturalistic evolution is limitted. He thinks the mechanisms suggested for powering the massive creativity and innovation in nature could not come from mutations alone.

His primary tool for advancing this argument is the evolution of the malaria bug, and of human immune defenses against it, over the past several thousand years. Behe shows that while microbes can and do evolve resistances to medicine, they generally do so by breaking down in some way, as does the human body. Touching briefly on the evolution of e coli and HIV, then on other critters, he makes the case that bugs that evolve rapidly, and through huge communities, demonstrate the limits to naturalistic evolution. The mathematical arguments he brings in to explain and support his more theoretical argument against the power of mutations, which some reviewers take issue with below, are not his main line of persuasion, nor, I admit, do they seem fully persuasive as developed here.

This book is not about Irreducible Complexity (IC). Behe defends the concept, and his examples of it, briefly, but that is not the main line of discussion, critics to the contrary. He's offered a lenghthier defense of IC elsewhere. (While I've read some of his Dover testimony, and some of the summary given in a critic's book, and agree he could have done better at some points, I think carefully considered written articles provide a better forum for ideas than a courtroom drama. As someone who has been known to stutter himself in interviews, I'm not inclined to judge a person's intelligence or argument on how well he holds up against hours of verbal examination by a well-prepared and clever attorney. In Debating Design, he seems to me to do well vs. Kenneth Miller and his famous Type III Secretory System.) But here Behe comes at the question from below, rather from above, looking at the actual known history of recent evolution among well-studied microorganisms. The book is, therefore, a good compliment to Darwin's Black Box.

Read it, and the discussion that will follow (both sides), and make up your own mind. Don't let the raw emotions so in evidence sway you. Behe is right or he is wrong, but he is not a fool. For me, the primary issue remains the frequency and character of beneficial and creative mutations. Looking into the question a bit myself recently, I found a pattern very like what Behe describes. Ironically, it seems to me the best argument against the position Behe stakes out here that I have seen so far is theological. Why would God create the malaria bug? I am still not satisfied that anyone really has the history of life pegged.
Was this review helpful to you?
116 of 156 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars An Important Work July 13, 2007
Format:Hardcover
After reading the many negative reviews of this book, I decided to read the book from cover to cover. I conclude that the negative reviews do not reflect the total contents of the book. Much of the material in this book is a review of the literature, which almost none of the critics found fault with. One can quibble with Behe's statistics, most of which he relied on those computed by others, but I have concluded that his main point is valid. I and others would find it very helpful if those who disagree with Behe's results to do their own calculations or refer us to the relevant literature. I have done similar calculations, only with mammals, and have concluded that combining mutational probability and the number of mammal life forms that have existed historically paints a far worse picture than Behe documents for bacteria. The number of uncorrected mutations compared with the number of mammals does not provide much hope that Darwinian mechanisms alone could provide the raw material to evolve mammals from their theoretical common ancestor. There are far to few mammals and far too few uncorrected mutations, most all of which, as has been well documented, are detrimental or, worse yet, near neutral. Many if not most mammals have historically, and today, existed in relatively small numbers. Ecologists have estimated how many Pandas, bears, big cats, and other mammals have ever existed, and the numbers are tiny compared to bacteria. The most successful mammals are the rodents and even their number is tiny compared to bacteria. I also found that many of the critical reviews of this book were just plain wrong. One of many examples is the claim that Behe "quickly" dismissed "the Red Queen hypothesis as a 'silly statement' ....ignoring the existence of a substantial body of supporting scientific literature" is irresponsible. Professor Behe is not calling the Red Queen hypothesis silly, but the statement in Louis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. Behe then spends much time discussing why he concluded the Red Queen hypothesis may not be correct.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars deep. May 10, 2013
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
This book was sometimes hard to follow, but Behe does a good job of explaining the implications of the science so most people can understand it. Evolution has its limits. There isn't enough time since life appeared on this planet to have allowed any life form to have evolved into what we have today. Behe does a great job of showing the limits of evolution.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Big challenge to evolution
The writer discussed in details the limits of evolution based on it's three fundamental process random mutation, natural selection and common descent on perspective of irreducible... Read more
Published 28 days ago by Mosa jaf
5.0 out of 5 stars DARWINISM, REDACTED
Very few reasonable-educated individuals can deny the basic process of evolution as originally described by Darwin and updated through Neo-Darwinism isn't basically correct. Read more
Published 2 months ago by Robert Steven Thomas
4.0 out of 5 stars Add my praise for this
This book is NOT a re-arranged repeat of DARWIN'S BLACK BOX. It presents a great deal of specific information which is not otherwise easily encountered. In credit to Prof. Read more
Published 6 months ago by Anne Witkowski
4.0 out of 5 stars very fine book
If it's written by one of the leading biologist in the world and if you are interested in the subject, this book is excellent. Read more
Published 7 months ago by teo
4.0 out of 5 stars carp
This is Michael Behe's second major work after his "Darwin's Blackbox" This is a quantum jump from qualitative to quantitave measurement of impossibility of Darwinian mechanism to... Read more
Published 17 months ago by Carp
3.0 out of 5 stars Good attempt but could propose more
Behe is a novel thinker who makes a good attempt to further the cause of Intelligent Design. This book is fairly well written although it does get bogged down at times. Read more
Published 17 months ago by bforn
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent book!
I enjoyed this book very much. Reasonable, compelling, simple and straightforward. Thank you, Behe. Please write more books like this one!
Published 17 months ago by Oregon
5.0 out of 5 stars Finally
This book presents indisputable scientific evidence that macro-evolution is impossible. In the late 70's I took Zoology, Botany, Statistics, and Genetics within 2 semesters at... Read more
Published 24 months ago by Gary P. Desterke
5.0 out of 5 stars clarity, honest approach to finding the truth
I appreciate fellow scientists in other fields who are after truth, innovation and accuracy. This is a refreshing read. Read more
Published 24 months ago by Joe Reviewer
1.0 out of 5 stars Behe is fake scientist and an intellectual light weight
Let's be Perfectly clear, Behe is an interesting philosopher but not a scientist--in fact as a scientist he is a failure in his chosen profession. Read more
Published on March 14, 2011 by K. Schwartz
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Forums

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Topic From this Discussion
Peer reviewed science journals have BANNED ID
Since you've decided to repost your comments here, I'll do the same in response to you:
Brent said: "We do not find any journals of science that allow any discussions which include Intelligent Design."

But then you go on to say:

"That fact is that "The Edge of... Read more
Sep 27, 2007 by RR |  See all 41 posts
Response to Behe's critics, I
Why would I conclude that the purpose of prey is anything? The tiger is hungry, he eats. Only other conclusion is that he was faster, luckier or smarter than the prey.

Are you saying that ID supposes that prey has a "purpose" and that purpose is to be eaten?
Aug 4, 2007 by RR |  See all 631 posts
Mortimer's Falsifiability Argument
This is how this thread starts:

Initial post: Sep 19, 2007 1:12:21 PM PDT
Tim Beazley says:
[Deleted by Amazon on Sep 29, 2008 9:50:36 AM PDT]

This is how it ends:

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 21, 2007 10:46:44 PM PDT
Tim Beazley says:
[Deleted by Amazon on Sep 29, 2008 9:50:35 AM...
Mar 20, 2012 by John Smith |  See all 8 posts
How did Michael Behe get to be so ignorant? Be the first to reply
How open-minded is David Marshall, really?
Good one, John 3:16. What nonsense is Marshall posting over on his blog? I don't even want to know...
Apr 29, 2011 by PrimeTruth |  See all 3 posts
Behe gets it wrong with respect to Ken Miller's book
Dear Mr. Kerney,

I find of great interest Taleb's book. Particularly his propensity to self-contradiction. His critical thinking with regard to creationists (as noted on pages 117-118) are actually logical tautologies. That is-they cannot be proven because whatever solution, evidence, or absence... Read more
Jun 4, 2009 by Alxsteele |  See all 5 posts
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



Listmania!


So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category