The author presents his position that the best U.S. government is the one that governs least and does not spend its resources building an empire. Presidents like Teddy Roosevelt, Wilson, FDR, Kennedy, Johnson, and Bush who spent a great deal of effort to expand the American Empire become the worst presidents in our history. The idea that we need an empire to push the battle lines farther from our shores is exposed as a hoax for the aggrandizement of the president in power. As the author so eloquently states, there is no reason for the U.S. to maintain its "great power" status, especially at the expense of its economy. Should we not learn from the case of the Soviet Union which fell because the obligations of its military empire were too great for its economy. The author posits; can it not happen to us?
The U.S. now has more than 700 military bases throughout the world, and maintains a significant position in NATO, an organization centered in Europe where the EU has the world's 2nd largest economy, but uses the US military as its security shield. Nice. And Japan uses us as their defense force while penetrating our economy and buying American domestic assets to our great detriment. Gee, the only thing made in America any more are its women and then increasingly by foreigners. But in the meantime we become the world's mercenary police force unfortunately paid by ourselves on behalf of others.
So the argument goes: we need Hawaii to protect the West Coast. Then Okinawa and Guam to protect Hawaii. Then Japanese bases to protect Okinawa. Then troops in South Korea to protect Japan and South Korea. Is there no end to this lunacy? I guess so -- only when we have troops all over the world to isolate any seemingly hostile country at its own borders. The problem, of course, is not only can we not afford this, it's that no other country agrees we need to do it. So by our own actions, we set ourselves up as the power to be defeated. And history proves that day will not be long in coming. Almost all empires have not lasted longer than 250 years -- (for us that would be 2039 at the latest.)
The author makes so many good points that it would take another book to recount them. But for example, he makes the case that Truman, Johnson and Bush I claimed the authority as President to take the U.S. into war. However, the pesky Constitution specifically states that the President is only the Commander-in-Chief, and that only Congress has the power to declare war. In addition, the people have the right to keep and bear arms for their own defense -- yet empire-mongering presidents have sought to eliminate that troublesome feature in the Constitution bit by bit to create subjects out of citizens. And on and on.
Everyone should read this book and ponder the ideas within. Author Eland has much to say, and there is much to learn here. The reader should not let himself be swept along by media propaganda to the downfall of the U.S. Even if I don't agree with all of the author's points, they still bear careful scrutiny and consideration. The reader will be the better for reading this work.
Highly recommended.
Oh, this review is based on the Updated Edition of 2008.