As other reviewers have already pointed out, this novel is NOT historically accurate, save for the general idea that Joan of Kent's third marriage to her first cousin once removed... Read morePublished 4 months ago by Isabella
I was pretty disappointed with this book. I understand that this is fiction, and that liberties will be taken with the characters and the story, but wow. Read morePublished 10 months ago by C. J. Attwood
I have enjoyed the book enormously.
Well known real historical story of the Joan of Kent and The Black Prince has been described and interpreted the way , I can... Read more
I really enjoyed this book and could not put it down. I enjoyed some of the historical facts in the book as well as some of the fictional aspects. Read morePublished 21 months ago by Kelly S.
This would have been better if she just would have used fictitious people instead of people who really lived. Read morePublished 23 months ago by Granma Linda
For those who don't understand the difference: Historical fiction is just that...FICTION (which means it's not real). Read morePublished on February 6, 2013 by KRM
This book had too many historical inaccuracies. I know it was a FICTION based on the life of Joan of Kent, and you expect it to have some things wrong just to keep the story... Read morePublished on February 5, 2013 by Patsy Lovell
If you enjoyed Anya Seton's, "Katherine", you will love "The First Princess of Wales". It has the makings of the best type of love story; one that keeps you enthralled, and makes... Read morePublished on April 3, 2012 by Jane
I don't understand why many historical fiction authors seem to think all their readers want a romance novel. I read these for the research and the narrative - NOT the sex. Read morePublished on November 21, 2011 by Anon