Well, my daughter borrowed it from the school library and when I first saw it I was enthralled and soon started browsing and could not stop reading, but then I fell onto some rather mistaken informations which, I am afraid, put the seed of mistrust in me. If I find such mistakes about subjects that I know well about, how many other people will also find other mistakes in this book about the subjects that they know well ? For instance, page 62, year 1274, we find: THe Japanese continue their relatively peaceful lives, shopping at the markets of Edo, Kyoto and Nara for (....)aubergines (.....) strawberries.(...).In those days Edo was a tiny village and Kyoto was certainly not called Kyoto either, as it was the capital, it was still called Heian-kyo or Miyako. Also, aubergines belong to the capsicum family and together with tomatoes, peppers, chilis, potatoes, they came from America, and certainly did not exist in Japan in those days. As for strawberries, are not they also one of the delicacies that we owe to America, as it appears on page 117 of the same book ? (1620) Regarding the Japanese peaceful lives too, this sounds a bit odd because this period is still troubled by feudal wars and plots and revenges, with lots of murders, castles burning, fields ravaged and people exiled... Hum! So much for peace! From a reader in Japan.