The Frankenfood Myth and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more



or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading The Frankenfood Myth on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

The Frankenfood Myth: How Protest and Politics Threaten the Biotech Revolution [Hardcover]

Henry Miller , Gregory Conko
4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (10 customer reviews)

List Price: $43.95
Price: $41.75 & FREE Shipping. Details
You Save: $2.20 (5%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, June 20? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $31.69  
Hardcover $41.75  
Paperback --  
Amazon.com Textbooks Store
Shop the Amazon.com Textbooks Store and save up to 70% on textbook rentals, 90% on used textbooks and 60% on eTextbooks.

Book Description

August 30, 2004 0275978796 978-0275978792

Few topics have inspired as much international furor and misinformation as the development and distribution of genetically altered foods. For thousands of years, farmers have bred crops for their resistance to disease, productivity, and nutritional value; and over the past century, scientists have used increasingly more sophisticated methods for modifying them at the genetic level. But only since the 1970s have advances in biotechnology (or gene-splicing to be more precise) upped the ante, with the promise of dramatically improved agricultural products—and public resistance far out of synch with the potential risks.

In this provocative and meticulously researched book, Henry Miller and Gregory Conko trace the origins of gene-splicing, its applications, and the backlash from consumer groups and government agencies against so-called Frankenfoods—from America to Zimbabwe. They explain how a happy conspiracy of anti-technology activism, bureaucratic over-reach, and business lobbying has resulted in a regulatory framework in which there is an inverse relationship between the degree of product risk and degree of regulatory scrutiny. The net result, they argue, is a combination of public confusion, political manipulation, ill-conceived regulation (from such agencies as the USDA, EPA, and FDA), and ultimately, the obstruction of one of the safest and most promising technologies ever developed—with profoundly negative consequences for the environment and starving people around the world. The authors go on to suggest a way to emerge from this morass, proposing a variety of business and policy reforms that can unlock the potential of this cutting-edge science, while ensuring appropriate safeguards and moving environmentally friendly products into the hands of farmers and consumers. This book is guaranteed to fuel the ongoing debate over the future of biotech and its cultural, economic, and political implications.


Frequently Bought Together

The Frankenfood Myth: How Protest and Politics Threaten the Biotech Revolution + Starved for Science: How Biotechnology Is Being Kept Out of Africa
Price for both: $58.30

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

Review

"Misguided public policies have seriously restricted research on, and applications of, genetic engineering in agriculture. Miller and Conko analyze why and how this has occurred. They point out the danger that the present unwarranted regulatory oppression will become the norm, and they make a strong case for drastic change in present policies. Their call for policies based on realistic risk-benefit considerations needs to be heard loudly by those responsible for the present fiasco."-Paul D. Boyer, Emeritus Professor University of California, Los Angeles, Co-Winner of the 1997 Nobel Prize in Chemistry

Book Description

Describes how misguided activism and government policies are squandering potential advances in biotechnology.


Product Details

  • Hardcover: 296 pages
  • Publisher: Praeger (August 30, 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0275978796
  • ISBN-13: 978-0275978792
  • Product Dimensions: 6.1 x 0.7 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (10 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,198,867 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
(10)
4.2 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
37 of 46 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Unique View of Ag Biotech Regulation February 16, 2005
Format:Hardcover
The Frankenfood Myth provides, rather colorfully, a history of the regulation of food and drugs in the U.S. and an interesting insider's take on the motivation of the federal employees doing that regulating. It also represents a different point of view in the debate over agricultural genetic engineering. Its authors disagree not only with the not-for-profit organizations like Environmental Defense and Greenpeace, but also with companies in the biotech industry like Monsanto and Novartis, about how to appropriately regulate the products of this "new biotechnology." More middle-of-the-road and consumer-oriented organizations, like the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology and the Center for Science in the Public Interest, aren't approaching it correctly either, the authors contend. Even the National Academy of Sciences, at least in its reports released since genetically engineered crops have been commercialized anyway, has it wrong! Miller and Conko's position may, in fact, be unique.

But their main point--that gene-spliced organisms, particularly crop plants produced for food and drugs, are being regulated too stringently in the United States--is not, in my opinion, adequately documented or otherwise substantiated enough to be convincing. And some of their supporting issues--such as those related to process vs. product, the adequacy of post-market policing, the effects of labeling--struck me as inconsistent as well.

For example, the authors claim, with no citation, that the "regulatory requirements for gene-spliced plants and foods have been ratcheted up steadily for nearly twenty years....
... Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
21 of 30 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Some needed fresh air to lend to a stale debate September 27, 2004
Format:Hardcover
Dr. Miller and Mr. Conko have done a tremendous service to all of those who care about intellectual honesty. This is a no-holds barred, gloves-off attack, not of the critics of biotechnology, but of the intellectual dishonesty and rampant hucksterism that passes for enlightened debate about issues of complexity nowadays.

Some readers will find the frank, prescriptive nature of some parts of the book unsettling. Good. That is precisely what is required today, to balance the gusher of not-so-frank, less than honest and dictatorial "information" and policy recommendations coming from the other side of the debate.

This book is long overdue, and I cannot recommend it more highly. Miller and Conko challenge you to disagree, and you should feel free to do so. Just make sure you have facts and empirically-based arguments, rather than vague principles in hand, before you venture forth.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Public Enemy #1 April 6, 2013
Format:Hardcover
Does anyone care that Henry Miller is a premier corporate flack. He was a founding member of the Philip Morris backed front group that tried to discredit the links between tobacco products and cancer. After the nuclear meltdown in Fukushima, he argued that exposure to radiation from the disaster could actually provide health benefits. He argues that drug companies, not the FDA, should be responsible for testing new drugs. And he is a board member of the George C. Marshall Institute which, funded by oil and gas companies, is notorious for its denial of climate change.
I don't agree that big business is honest enough to police itself...not when their is a profit to be made.
It is a sad day when the people we trust to get our intellectual information from are being paid to state their finding in light of the people that are hurting us.
This book does not give enough fact or proof to show that deregulation is smart, or the healthy answer for Americans safety.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Format:Hardcover
The authors wrote in the Prologue to this 2004 book, "This volume analyzes the foibles, errors, and onconsistencies of current regulatory overreach in the context of biotechnology... Advances that represent great benefits for humankind have been delayed and possibly lost altogether. As a result, both our public and individual lives are diminished. Perhaps this volume will serve as a wake-up call to the deficiencies of current public policy and will chart a course to better prospects for the future."

They add, "In this volume, we dissect various aspects of public policy toward the new biotechnology: its roots...; its nurturing by media eager for stories about 'the tomato that ate Toledo'; and its complex relationship with culture and agriculture. Finally, we map out reforms that could salvage some production of food and pharmaceuticals." (Pg. 2)

They note that although critics fear so-called "super weeds," herbicide-tolerant canola, soybean, and wheat plants "have been produced with conventional breeding for more than twenty years, and no unmanageable weed problems have been reported as a result." (Pg. 25)

They disagree that scientists have a special responsibility to "mold their research programs and findings to accommodate the public's fears, or that they should hold town hall meetings at which they explain the value of their work." (Pg. 35) The scientific community, they argue, "should not gracefully or passively tolerate activist campaigns who doctrines contradict empirical knowledge." (Pg. 51) However, they suggest that scientists with "mainstream views have a particular obligation to expose and debunk the misrepresenatations of their few rogue colleagues." (Pg.
... Read more ›
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars Biotech: Enormous Potential Compromised by Self-Interest, Bad Science,...
In The Frankenfood Myth: How Protest and Politics Threaten the Biotech Revolution, food safety experts Henry Miller and Gregory Conko have written a brilliant account of how... Read more
Published on February 22, 2010 by Jay Lehr
5.0 out of 5 stars The Politics of Science
Henry I. Miller has navigated successfully a very challenging course as a popular writer: weaving together a basic education in bioscience and biotechnology and an orientation to... Read more
Published on September 19, 2005 by Richard L. Sutter
5.0 out of 5 stars Comfort Food
The authors do a masterful job of exposing the misapprehension -- spread by regulators and activists, and abetted by the media -- that "genetic modification" is untested, unproven... Read more
Published on October 10, 2004 by Tuscany
5.0 out of 5 stars Honest reading
Miller and Conko deserve much credit for their painstaking presentation and research. They document and present the issues of what has gone wrong with biotechnology regulation and... Read more
Published on October 6, 2004 by Andrew Seidenfeld
5.0 out of 5 stars It's about time
It is time for people to stop being frightened of gene splicing, etc. when it is the answer to so much hunger and resource consumption. Read more
Published on September 14, 2004 by A. Oesterling
5.0 out of 5 stars A Balance of Science and Nature for the Benefit of Mankind
What a welcome prospective from such a distinguished duo! Extremely well written and informative. Anyone who loves food; is interested in distinguishisng myths of paranoia from... Read more
Published on September 13, 2004 by Hiacynth Bouquet
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews




What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 





Look for Similar Items by Category