I received "The Gift" from a very gifted friend as a gift. And indeed, the book is filled to the brim with all manner of cross-references to gifting and gift-exchanging and giftedness, set in opposition to marketing, selling, and getting.
But by the time I finished, I was left wondering what the point was. All this anthropological evidence of ritual gift-giving, the economic history of Europe, the psychological analysis of Whitman & Pond, written by someone who is neither anthropologist, economist, historian or psychologist, and all for what?
Mr. Hyde devotes more than a hundred pages of his book to the subject of usury, as though that were at the root of the problem, and yet here's what's at the bottom of p. 355 (in a footnote! no less) of the final page of his long essay on Pound, just before his Conclusion: "One of Pound's last pieces of writing was a clarification: "Re USURY, I was out of focus, taking a symptom for a cause. The cause is AVARICE."
A "clarification" that Mr. Hyde appears to have ignored throughout his own book, which is indeed out of focus, full of eddies of cloudy, dense, abstruse passages that circle about and seem to be going somewhere, but don't.