Start reading The God Delusion on the free Kindle Reading App or on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
OR
with Kindle Unlimited

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Enter a promotion code
or gift card
 
 
 

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

The God Delusion [Kindle Edition]

Richard Dawkins
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2,570 customer reviews)

Digital List Price: $15.95 What's this?
Print List Price: $15.95
Kindle Price: $9.59
You Save: $6.36 (40%)
 
Kindle Unlimited with narration
Read and listen to this title for free and get unlimited access to over 600,000 titles. Learn More

Whispersync for Voice

Switch back and forth between reading the Kindle book and listening to the Audible narration. Add narration for a reduced price of $3.49 after you buy the Kindle book. Learn More

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $9.59  
Hardcover $18.69  
Paperback $10.54  
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged $20.47  
Unknown Binding --  
Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged $23.95 or Free with Audible 30-day free trial
Kindle Unlimited
Kindle Unlimited
Enjoy unlimited access to over 600,000 titles and thousands of audiobooks on any device for $9.99 a month, including this one. Learn more

Book Description

A preeminent scientist—and the world's most prominent atheist—asserts the irrationality of belief in God and the grievous harm religion has inflicted on society, from the Crusades to 9/11.


With rigor and wit, Dawkins examines God in all his forms, from the sex-obsessed tyrant of the Old Testament to the more benign (but still illogical) Celestial Watchmaker favored by some Enlightenment thinkers. He eviscerates the major arguments for religion and demonstrates the supreme improbability of a supreme being. He shows how religion fuels war, foments bigotry, and abuses children, buttressing his points with historical and contemporary evidence. The God Delusion makes a compelling case that belief in God is not just wrong but potentially deadly. It also offers exhilarating insight into the advantages of atheism to the individual and society, not the least of which is a clearer, truer appreciation of the universe's wonders than any faith could ever muster.



Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

The antireligion wars started by Daniel Dennett and Sam Harris will heat up even more with this salvo from celebrated Oxford biologist Dawkins. For a scientist who criticizes religion for its intolerance, Dawkins has written a surprisingly intolerant book, full of scorn for religion and those who believe. But Dawkins, who gave us the selfish gene, anticipates this criticism. He says it's the scientist and humanist in him that makes him hostile to religions—fundamentalist Christianity and Islam come in for the most opprobrium—that close people's minds to scientific truth, oppress women and abuse children psychologically with the notion of eternal damnation. While Dawkins can be witty, even confirmed atheists who agree with his advocacy of science and vigorous rationalism may have trouble stomaching some of the rhetoric: the biblical Yahweh is "psychotic," Aquinas's proofs of God's existence are "fatuous" and religion generally is "nonsense." The most effective chapters are those in which Dawkins calms down, for instance, drawing on evolution to disprove the ideas behind intelligent design. In other chapters, he attempts to construct a scientific scaffolding for atheism, such as using evolution again to rebut the notion that without God there can be no morality. He insists that religion is a divisive and oppressive force, but he is less convincing in arguing that the world would be better and more peaceful without it. (Oct. 18)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Scientific American

Richard Dawkins, in The God Delusion, tells of his exasperation with colleagues who try to play both sides of the street: looking to science for justification of their religious convictions while evading the most difficult implications—the existence of a prime mover sophisticated enough to create and run the universe, "to say nothing of mind reading millions of humans simultaneously." Such an entity, he argues, would have to be extremely complex, raising the question of how it came into existence, how it communicates —through spiritons!—and where it resides. Dawkins is frequently dismissed as a bully, but he is only putting theological doctrines to the same kind of scrutiny that any scientific theory must withstand. No one who has witnessed the merciless dissection of a new paper in physics would describe the atmosphere as overly polite.

George Johnson is author of Fire in the Mind: Science, Faith, and the Search for Order and six other books. He resides on the Web at talaya.net


Product Details

  • File Size: 818 KB
  • Print Length: 464 pages
  • Publisher: Mariner Books; Reprint edition (January 25, 2011)
  • Sold by: Amazon Digital Services, Inc.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B003JTHWJQ
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Lending: Not Enabled
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,358 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?


Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
1,472 of 1,620 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Disillusioned Catholic November 11, 2006
Format:Hardcover
I read numerous reviews before I bought this book. Because of the controversial nature of the topic I was very interested in the perspective of the reviewer. Often this perspective was easy to guess but not always. So to make this review more valuable to the reader I would like to state my background first. I am a 50 year old active Catholic who has slowly become disillusioned by religion starting as a child when told my Protestant friend would not go to heaven. For years I existed on "faith" since I personally could find no evidence that God existed. As a Catholic there is also a good helping of "guilt" for good measure. I am also a very strong Constitutionalist and believe that the only way to get along is to have freedom of and freedom from religion. With the recent surge of religious fundamentalism and its effects on politics I have become increasingly concerned about what Dawkins calls the American Taliban and the push for a Christian Theocracy. This actually scares me more than Al-Qaida. The words "Faith" and "Belief" have been morphed into the word "Truth". This new "Truth" has caused me to do a lot of searching for answers for what really is true.

Richard Dawkins book was extremely helpful and was the first book I have read on the Atheist side of the fence. I found Chapters 1 through 4 and 7 through 9 easy to read. Chapters 5, 6, 7 and 10 were more scientific and a hard read for the average person. I actually needed a dictionary at my side to get through those chapters. I particularly liked the section in Chapter 3 on Pascal's Wager which I had mistakenly credited to Einstein in the past.

What I had found so interesting is that he expressed ideas that I had been developing in my brain for years, but did not feel free to discuss with others.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
2,654 of 3,023 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Read the Reviews! October 28, 2006
Format:Hardcover
I've just finished reading the 141 reviews above mine, and I think they're utterly fascinating--almost as interesting as the book. And the scores--the numbers who find each review helpful--are equally remarkable.

Some reviewers, delighted to find their opinions supported by Dawkins, use the opportunity to bask in their superior intellects and display their generous contempt for those who disagree.

Other reviewers feel personally attacked by this book, fending it off as best they can so they can retain their illusions, which are obviously valuable and meaningful to them.

Actually, you don't even have to read the reviews to see which is which. Just look at the numbers. If you see very few finding the review useful, you'll know the review was written by someone opposing Dawkins' ideas. And if the majority find the review helpful, that means it agrees with Dawkins.

This tells me that most of the people who are bothering to read the reviews are already pro-Dawkins--and it bodes ill for his hopes that his book will convert the believers.

It won't convert many believers, not because it is wrong--it isn't--and not because it isn't well-written--it is--but because whatever else you can say about faith, it isn't easily extinguished. For those who have it, it is the only life raft on a limitless ocean. Those who don't have learned how to swim, or plan to.

The most annoying reviewers, from my point of view, are those whose remarks demonstrate they haven't read the book (such as the fellow who insists Einstein was a believer), or those who feel Dawkins doesn't have the Biblical knowledge to back up his conclusions.

He doesn't need any Biblical knowledge. None of us do, when it comes to the question of belief.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
273 of 312 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Reaches its intended audience December 21, 2006
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
Many have criticized this book for not speaking in a voice that could influence religious fundamentalists away from their delusion. There is no way the topic can be discussed that would have any hope of doing this. It would be akin to writing a book that through gentle persuasion would reason a paranoid out of his delusions. Ain't going to happen.

I believe the intended audience is those who already have grave doubts, and are looking for a well reasoned examination of the issue. I was impressed by the simple and straightforward approach to resolving a basic question: "since we can't know for sure if God exists, shouldn't we all be agnositics?"

I also enjoyed his definition of a pantheist (I'll leave that for the reader to discover).

The opening sections on Einstein and his "religious" beliefs, and a general discussion of pantheism and deism are worth the price of the book just by themselves.

As an aside -- those reviewers who cite Einstein's religious conversion away from atheism have clearly not read even this much of the book.

Written with great humor and wonderful quotations -- I am sure there is something here to offend just about everyone -- but also with great courage and forthrightfullness.
Was this review helpful to you?
1,042 of 1,238 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Not the best work on atheism January 4, 2007
Format:Hardcover
Before considering Professor Dawkins's bestseller, a mention must be made of the over 300 reviews here posted as well as the assorted blogs, debates, and article the book has provoked. Reading through these, whether pro or con, one can not help but notice a clear and unnerving trend, not unlike one sees in reviews regarding works on the Middle East conflict; those who agree with his thesis from the outset almost always offer resounding and unadulterated praise without considering even the possibility of flaws in his methodology or logic. Of course, at the same time, those who hold his position as heresy rarely respond in any logical method to his position and rarely even seem willing to acknowledge the professor's obvious strength's as a writer. Such failure of reasoning on both sides points to a disheartening decline in the state of the western intellectual tradition that should give every person pause.

As a great fan of Professor Dawkins's previous work, "The Selfish Gene," a book that provided me with considerable food for thought several years back and profoundly altered my thinking, I looked forward with some excitement to "The God Delusion." Reading the new book on recognizes quickly that this is in fact one book, with three goals. Professor Dawkins imagines these goals as not only compatible, but structural to the argument he seeks to build. As for me I am less certain.

The first part restates much of what might be found in "The Selfish Gene," albeit more briefly and with some editions based on more recent scholarship.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars I love it
Great book.
Published 19 hours ago by Robert Fuquay
4.0 out of 5 stars Religion and reason will never mix.
Dawkins presents a lot of interesting inciteful arguments. Not sure he will ever convert "The Faithful," but for those of us with a questioning mind this book should offer... Read more
Published 2 days ago by Mark Mosher
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Richard Dawkins rules!!!
Published 2 days ago by JesseValentine
5.0 out of 5 stars A clear explanation of natural selection/evolution and a complete...
A clear explanation of natural selection/evolution and a complete obliteration of obvious religious dogmatic nonsense such as creationism, biblical fairy tales, and supernatural... Read more
Published 2 days ago by M. Kaye
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Excellent read!
Published 2 days ago by Jim Drikakis
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
excelent book
Published 3 days ago by Stefano Ciafardone
5.0 out of 5 stars Best book I've ever read.
Phenomenal reading for anyone religious or not.
Published 5 days ago by Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Pretty good item. Very good quality.
Published 6 days ago by Biztrades
5.0 out of 5 stars Loved it.
Dawkins is able to explain things with such ease, you never feel like its too complicated. He has a real charm and authority. Read more
Published 6 days ago by Adam Glynn
2.0 out of 5 stars Tedious and overwought
Tedious and overwought. Dawkins has some interesting points but he belabors them to death. I tend to agree with what he has to say, but he frequently says it in a way that makes... Read more
Published 6 days ago by Eric Cox
Search Customer Reviews
Search these reviews only

More About the Author

Richard Dawkins taught zoology at the University of California at Berkeley and at Oxford University and is now the Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford, a position he has held since 1995. Among his previous books are The Ancestor's Tale, The Selfish Gene, The Blind Watchmaker, Climbing Mount Improbable, Unweaving the Rainbow, and A Devil's Chaplain. Dawkins lives in Oxford with his wife, the actress and artist Lalla Ward.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?



Forums

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Topic From this Discussion
The Story of Bruce Bain
I've been wondering what actually goes through Bruce Bain's mind. I think it's something like this:

+++Bruce_Bain: Response Program Activated+++
.
.
.
.
.
.
##########################################
Identify Previous Response...
+Response... Read More
Apr 22, 2014 by Jack Baxter |  See all 29 posts
Translating Bruce-Speak
Some more Bainian phrases with explanatory notes:

"Per usual you are relying on the Fallacy of the Bare Assertion (Fallacy of the Ipse Dixit)"

Translation: I am fond of using latinisms I've found in philosophy textbooks regardless of whether I understand what they mean. I also like... Read More
Dec 12, 2012 by Mr. Jeremy C. Alam |  See all 49 posts
Question to the Dawkins fans
No. Because it isn't.

Obviously.

But you stay classy, Forests.
Jun 29, 2012 by Brian Curtis |  See all 8 posts
Eugene Koonin has proven Dawkins wrong
Drifter,

Koonin hasn't proven Dr. Dawkins wrong. That is your own little inaccurate conclusion. Dr. Koonin is writing about the modern synthesis and how it will need to be revised due to complexities that are inherent in the evolutionary process. The Theory of Evolution has changed since Darwin... Read More
Mar 25, 2013 by Scientific Mind |  See all 21 posts
Do you believe in the American Taliban?
David//

I am not American but I have plenty of American friends. Some of them are very devout Christians. None of them are "talibanish" in their beliefs.

That said, I think advocating for school prayer, tearing up Row vs Wade and working against civil union of gay couples, takes the... Read More
Feb 26, 2007 by Lord Jim |  See all 346 posts
Arguments and Evidence Supporting Atheistic Perspectives Be the first to reply
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



Look for Similar Items by Category