In 2000, the newly formed Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society asked a group of more than a dozen senior scholars from across the country to carefully examine all of the evidence for and against the allegations that Thomas Jefferson fathered one or more children by Sally Hemings, one of his slaves, and to issue a public report. In April 2001, after a year of study, the Scholars Commission issued the most detailed report to date on the issue. With but a single mild dissent, the views of the distinguished panel ranged from ''serious skepticism'' to a conviction that the allegation was ''almost certainly false.'' This volume, edited by Scholars Commission Chairman Robert F. Turner, includes the ''Final Report''--essentially a summary of arguments and conclusions--as it was released to the press on April 12, 2001. However, several of the statements of individual views--which collectively total several hundred carefully footnoted pages and constitute the bulk of the book--have been updated and expanded to reflect new insights or evidence since the report was initially released.
The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
 |
| |||||||||||||||
 Sell Back Your Copy for $13.50
No matter where you bought them, get up to 70% back when you sell your books at Amazon.com.
Used Price$31.80
Trade-in Price$13.50
Price after
Trade-in$18.30 |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
Review
''In fairness to all parties, some of the historians, researchers, writers, and freelance controversialists to have weighed in on the question have made significant contributions to our knowledge of an understandably sensitive subject. Robert F. Turner in his meticulous and fair-minded 'The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy,' for example, does yeoman service poking holes in some of the claims of what might be regarded as the pro-Sally school, from Fawn Brodie to Annette Gordon-Reed. Turner's is a long-overdue corrective, worthy of respect and serious consideration.'' --Alan Pell Crawford, author, ''Twilight at Monticello: The Final Years of Thomas Jefferson''
''...the report provides a valuable documentary history, useful as much for what it suggests about the Jefferson-Hemings controversy as for its value for historiographical analysis. Summing Up: Recommended. For all research libraries, lower-level undergraduate and above.'' --J.D. Smith, CHOICE Magazine April 2012, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
''...Robert Turner's 'The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy: Report of the Scholars Commission' (2011)...presents a substantial argument for the position that Hemings's paternity is still unknown.'' --Alan Pell Crawford, Wall Street Journal, Sat., April 14, 2012, p. C8
''...the report provides a valuable documentary history, useful as much for what it suggests about the Jefferson-Hemings controversy as for its value for historiographical analysis. Summing Up: Recommended. For all research libraries, lower-level undergraduate and above.'' --J.D. Smith, CHOICE Magazine April 2012, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
''...Robert Turner's 'The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy: Report of the Scholars Commission' (2011)...presents a substantial argument for the position that Hemings's paternity is still unknown.'' --Alan Pell Crawford, Wall Street Journal, Sat., April 14, 2012, p. C8
About the Author
Robert Turner is Associate Director of the Center for National Security Law at University of Virginia School of Law.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
68 of 75 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
After reading this book, you will ask yourself, "Why has this work been mostly ignored for the past decade?"
September 19, 2011
By T.
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Two summers ago, my family and I spent a week or so in Charlottesville, Va. As part of our explorations, we decided to spend the day at nearby Monticello, which is the world-famous estate of Thomas Jefferson. The prestigious University of Virginia (U.Va.), which was founded and designed by Mr. Jefferson, is also located in Charlottesville and was recently voted the second-best public university in America. Incidentally, the editor of this book, Robert F. Turner, is a former professor at U.Va. I consider myself an amateur Thomas Jefferson historian, and a voracious reader of early American history in general.
Although we had been to Monticello several times before, we had never visited the beautiful new Visitor's Center. As we sat down in the theatre and began to view a biographical film of Thomas Jefferson, I was surprised to learn from the film that Mr. Jefferson had fathered all of his slave Sally Hemings's children. I fully expected there to be a mention of the possibility that Mr. Jefferson had fathered one of her children based on the infamous DNA test in 1998, but I did not expect to learn from the film that he had fathered every single one of them.
Based on my knowledge of the subject, I knew that this information was factually incorrect. I was aware of the first edition of this book and its conclusions. I was also aware that the infamous DNA study established the likelihood that a Jefferson male (DNA could not specify who the father was) may have fathered "one" of Sally Hemings's numerous children. But, that there were two-dozen candidates including Mr. Jefferson's brother Randolph in the vicinity at the time of each conception. Did you know, for example, that his brother Randolph was known to "party" and play music with some of the enslaved people at Monticello? And, that even though Mr. Jefferson was present during the conceptions, many of those two-dozen family members would likely have been present as well (his presence at Monticello was noteworthy, causing family members and other people to visit and stay). Furthermore, there was flimsy or no evidence that Ms. Hemings was present at Monticello during those conception times. It wasn't unusual for slave masters to loan their slaves out to other plantations. I was also aware that the DNA study established that the "oral history" was incorrect (e.g. oral history said he had fathered a different child of hers which the DNA disproved). I became concerned that a layperson who viewed the film might very well take the incorrect information presented in the film as fact. After the film, my daughter questioned me due to her lack of knowledge on the subject.
After viewing the film, my family and I viewed the remainder of the Visitor's Center. I found numerous examples among the various exhibits that came to the same aforementioned conclusion in the film; all the children were fathered by Mr. Jefferson. Surprisingly, upon closer inspection, I also found to my dismay that several of the exhibits appeared to contradict each other and the film that I had just viewed (i.e. some were definitive about paternity, others were not). I wondered to myself, "Huh?" I was truly confused by what I had viewed up to that point. My confusion is noteworthy because I am very knowledgeable about this subject.
Additionally, I was perplexed by the overall tone that I felt while at Monticello; something I had not experienced the three times I had previously visited. In my humble opinion, the place had gone from an inspiring place that honored an incredible man, blemishes and all, to some sort of slavery/Hemings family museum with an anti-Jefferson tone. Something akin to a Holocaust museum with Mr. Jefferson at the helm. There is no doubt that slavery and those who were enslaved must be acknowledged and studied. And, this should be one of the many aspects of the Monticello experience. But, does this have to be the main focus? My family and I made the decision not to return, even though our daughter is considering attending the University of Virginia in the near future, until Monticello changes its focus. If you want to have a slavery museum, build a separate one. But, don't hijack Monticello, so to speak.
I ask the reader to consider this: Would a memorial at the home of the great Reverend/Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., for example, include the fact that he plagiarized his Doctoral Thesis and was reported to be a womanizer, despite being a man of God. Let's be consistent. All great men have blemishes; some small and some large. Most people would not visit such a place with the idea of being inspired and to honor the man, only to then be bombarded with this other information. But, I suspect such a place would never even consider making visitors aware of this information.
When I arrived home, I read all of the available information that I could find. Incidentally, I was already aware of most of it. I wanted to be objective. Had some new information come to light? Had I missed something? Sadly, there was no new relevant information that I found. What I found consisted of more speculation and a new elevated focus on "oral history." I knew how inaccurate oral history can be. The infamous DNA study demonstrated this fact. Remember: The original paternity allegation against Mr. Jefferson made by scandelmonger James Callendar, which specifically named one of Sally Hemings's numerous children as his, and the subsequent oral history, were found to be incorrect by the DNA study.
Incidentally, while reviewing my daughter's high school Advanced Placement (AP) U.S. History textbook recently, I learned from it that it is now all-but-certain that Thomas Jefferson fathered all of Sally Hemings's children. One whole page within this textbook is solely devoted to this particular subject. Presumably, this textbook is used in high schools across America because the AP test is a national one. It made me wonder what other liberties were taken throughout this textbook.
This updated edition, which I found to be thorough and enlightening, builds upon the previously published work from a decade ago. It also discusses and gives examples of how the controversy has been treated in the various media outlets and the academic world. The reader of this book comes away with the realization that the conclusions of these numerous accomplished scholars are valid and cannot be ignored.
Incidentally, it is not only the scholars in this book that do not agree with the currently popular view that Mr. Jefferson fathered all, or any for that matter, of Sally Hemings's numerous children.
Why does all of this misinformation exist? Call it what you will: revisionism; political correctness; post-modernism; correcting past wrongs; intense pressure from certain groups; social justice. Or, it may just be that such a salacious story is extremely profitable. We must require our historians to error on the side of caution. Why aren't they in this case?
One troubling aspect of this controversy is that anyone who questions the accuracy of Jefferson being the father is often (and swiftly) labeled a racist. I fully expect to be attacked and accused of being a racist. Can't those African-Americans who promote this inaccuracy be accused of being racists as well?
Why does this matter? Why is it important? Did Mr. Jefferson father none, one, or all of Sally Hemings's numerous children? Paternity is not the real issue. The real issue is how misinformation has been spread for much too long, and the various reasons why this may have occurred. Would you want historians writing incorrect information about you or your loved ones? Especially if that information may cast you in a bad light with some people. Find me one person who believes this controversy to be true, and does not think less of Mr. Jefferson for it; especially African-Americans.
The opinions contained in this review are mine and mine only. Educate yourself and come to your own conclusions. I believe that you will be genuinely surprised at what you learn, especially if you have been led to believe that the allegations regarding paternity are true.
Post Script: During the summer of 2012, my family and I re-visited Charlottesville for a few days for the purpose of touring the University of Virginia, among other things. My daughter wanted to take one last tour before applying. Sadly, I could not bring myself to visit Monticello, even though my son had never been there.
Although we had been to Monticello several times before, we had never visited the beautiful new Visitor's Center. As we sat down in the theatre and began to view a biographical film of Thomas Jefferson, I was surprised to learn from the film that Mr. Jefferson had fathered all of his slave Sally Hemings's children. I fully expected there to be a mention of the possibility that Mr. Jefferson had fathered one of her children based on the infamous DNA test in 1998, but I did not expect to learn from the film that he had fathered every single one of them.
Based on my knowledge of the subject, I knew that this information was factually incorrect. I was aware of the first edition of this book and its conclusions. I was also aware that the infamous DNA study established the likelihood that a Jefferson male (DNA could not specify who the father was) may have fathered "one" of Sally Hemings's numerous children. But, that there were two-dozen candidates including Mr. Jefferson's brother Randolph in the vicinity at the time of each conception. Did you know, for example, that his brother Randolph was known to "party" and play music with some of the enslaved people at Monticello? And, that even though Mr. Jefferson was present during the conceptions, many of those two-dozen family members would likely have been present as well (his presence at Monticello was noteworthy, causing family members and other people to visit and stay). Furthermore, there was flimsy or no evidence that Ms. Hemings was present at Monticello during those conception times. It wasn't unusual for slave masters to loan their slaves out to other plantations. I was also aware that the DNA study established that the "oral history" was incorrect (e.g. oral history said he had fathered a different child of hers which the DNA disproved). I became concerned that a layperson who viewed the film might very well take the incorrect information presented in the film as fact. After the film, my daughter questioned me due to her lack of knowledge on the subject.
After viewing the film, my family and I viewed the remainder of the Visitor's Center. I found numerous examples among the various exhibits that came to the same aforementioned conclusion in the film; all the children were fathered by Mr. Jefferson. Surprisingly, upon closer inspection, I also found to my dismay that several of the exhibits appeared to contradict each other and the film that I had just viewed (i.e. some were definitive about paternity, others were not). I wondered to myself, "Huh?" I was truly confused by what I had viewed up to that point. My confusion is noteworthy because I am very knowledgeable about this subject.
Additionally, I was perplexed by the overall tone that I felt while at Monticello; something I had not experienced the three times I had previously visited. In my humble opinion, the place had gone from an inspiring place that honored an incredible man, blemishes and all, to some sort of slavery/Hemings family museum with an anti-Jefferson tone. Something akin to a Holocaust museum with Mr. Jefferson at the helm. There is no doubt that slavery and those who were enslaved must be acknowledged and studied. And, this should be one of the many aspects of the Monticello experience. But, does this have to be the main focus? My family and I made the decision not to return, even though our daughter is considering attending the University of Virginia in the near future, until Monticello changes its focus. If you want to have a slavery museum, build a separate one. But, don't hijack Monticello, so to speak.
I ask the reader to consider this: Would a memorial at the home of the great Reverend/Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., for example, include the fact that he plagiarized his Doctoral Thesis and was reported to be a womanizer, despite being a man of God. Let's be consistent. All great men have blemishes; some small and some large. Most people would not visit such a place with the idea of being inspired and to honor the man, only to then be bombarded with this other information. But, I suspect such a place would never even consider making visitors aware of this information.
When I arrived home, I read all of the available information that I could find. Incidentally, I was already aware of most of it. I wanted to be objective. Had some new information come to light? Had I missed something? Sadly, there was no new relevant information that I found. What I found consisted of more speculation and a new elevated focus on "oral history." I knew how inaccurate oral history can be. The infamous DNA study demonstrated this fact. Remember: The original paternity allegation against Mr. Jefferson made by scandelmonger James Callendar, which specifically named one of Sally Hemings's numerous children as his, and the subsequent oral history, were found to be incorrect by the DNA study.
Incidentally, while reviewing my daughter's high school Advanced Placement (AP) U.S. History textbook recently, I learned from it that it is now all-but-certain that Thomas Jefferson fathered all of Sally Hemings's children. One whole page within this textbook is solely devoted to this particular subject. Presumably, this textbook is used in high schools across America because the AP test is a national one. It made me wonder what other liberties were taken throughout this textbook.
This updated edition, which I found to be thorough and enlightening, builds upon the previously published work from a decade ago. It also discusses and gives examples of how the controversy has been treated in the various media outlets and the academic world. The reader of this book comes away with the realization that the conclusions of these numerous accomplished scholars are valid and cannot be ignored.
Incidentally, it is not only the scholars in this book that do not agree with the currently popular view that Mr. Jefferson fathered all, or any for that matter, of Sally Hemings's numerous children.
Why does all of this misinformation exist? Call it what you will: revisionism; political correctness; post-modernism; correcting past wrongs; intense pressure from certain groups; social justice. Or, it may just be that such a salacious story is extremely profitable. We must require our historians to error on the side of caution. Why aren't they in this case?
One troubling aspect of this controversy is that anyone who questions the accuracy of Jefferson being the father is often (and swiftly) labeled a racist. I fully expect to be attacked and accused of being a racist. Can't those African-Americans who promote this inaccuracy be accused of being racists as well?
Why does this matter? Why is it important? Did Mr. Jefferson father none, one, or all of Sally Hemings's numerous children? Paternity is not the real issue. The real issue is how misinformation has been spread for much too long, and the various reasons why this may have occurred. Would you want historians writing incorrect information about you or your loved ones? Especially if that information may cast you in a bad light with some people. Find me one person who believes this controversy to be true, and does not think less of Mr. Jefferson for it; especially African-Americans.
The opinions contained in this review are mine and mine only. Educate yourself and come to your own conclusions. I believe that you will be genuinely surprised at what you learn, especially if you have been led to believe that the allegations regarding paternity are true.
Post Script: During the summer of 2012, my family and I re-visited Charlottesville for a few days for the purpose of touring the University of Virginia, among other things. My daughter wanted to take one last tour before applying. Sadly, I could not bring myself to visit Monticello, even though my son had never been there.
23 of 24 people found the following review helpful
By Fred A.
Format:Kindle Edition|Amazon Verified Purchase
Robert Turner's book provides a well-researched, even-handed review of the issues resulting from James Callender's charges in 1802 that Thomas Jefferson fathered children with his slave, Sally Hemings. In addition to providing historical information directly related to the subjects of the controversy and a clear explanation of the methodology and results of the DNA testing done in 1998, the book provides information about the treatment given this information over the years by scholars, authors and institutions such as the Thomas Jefferson Foundation.
The book is an easy read that appears to present all sides of the issues and leaves it to the readers to decide for themselves. There are also direct challenges to errors and misinformation written about Thomas Jefferson, Sally Hemings and other elements of the controversy accompanied by an open invitation for public debate on the issues. The true value of this book will be realized if those invitations are accepted and the public has an opportunity to see those issues resolved based on the facts.
The book is an easy read that appears to present all sides of the issues and leaves it to the readers to decide for themselves. There are also direct challenges to errors and misinformation written about Thomas Jefferson, Sally Hemings and other elements of the controversy accompanied by an open invitation for public debate on the issues. The true value of this book will be realized if those invitations are accepted and the public has an opportunity to see those issues resolved based on the facts.
23 of 25 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
I bought this extremely good book for $36 from the publisher, Carolina Academic Press in Durham, North Carolina -- new.
What an incredible and revealing research document that keeps the reader's interest! The facts are fascinating and clearly show that currently accepted reality that Thomas Jefferson fathered Sally Hemings' children is simply far from factually proven. From DNA analysis to letters from the period point to Jefferson's brother as the likely father. This is an important addition to the historical record and it should be the basis for a calm review of the Thomas Jefferson/Sally Hemings relationship. The author/editor of this book has proven that true scholarship still exists.
What an incredible and revealing research document that keeps the reader's interest! The facts are fascinating and clearly show that currently accepted reality that Thomas Jefferson fathered Sally Hemings' children is simply far from factually proven. From DNA analysis to letters from the period point to Jefferson's brother as the likely father. This is an important addition to the historical record and it should be the basis for a calm review of the Thomas Jefferson/Sally Hemings relationship. The author/editor of this book has proven that true scholarship still exists.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
Bad Link--Book and Kindle ARE Available on Amazon
This book is already on Amazon with several reviews and is readily available. Go to:... Read more
Published 12 months ago by R. Turner
2.0 out of 5 stars
What you think before you look at evidence
What you think before you look at evidence necessarily influences what the evidence tells you. That's what I got out of this book. Read more
Published 13 months ago by Stephanie Moore
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Jefferson-Hemings controversry
This book is extremely compelling, as it states both sides as to the possible paternity of Sally Hemings children. Read more
Published 13 months ago by David Pidcock
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Scholarly Review
Professor Turner has made a strong case for the findings of the Commission. He has referenced all the scholarly evidence he uses to make the case (without altering the references)... Read more
Published 14 months ago by Robert Andrew
4.0 out of 5 stars
Review of "The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy:Report of the SDcholars...
This book is a very scholarly work.
I worked in Charlottesville,VA for many years.
It seemed that one may meet Jefferson and Hemings on the mall . Read more
I worked in Charlottesville,VA for many years.
It seemed that one may meet Jefferson and Hemings on the mall . Read more
Published 16 months ago by Patricia Trusselle
5.0 out of 5 stars
Historical Scholarship at its Best!
The Scholars Commission Report is a thoughtful look at the Jefferson-Hemings story. The 10 experts whose work is contained in the report give balanced, unbiased, commonsense... Read more
Published 19 months ago by Soda
5.0 out of 5 stars
Reality
This study convincingly demolishes the myth and calumny continually promulgated by Jefferson's enemies such as Annette Gordon-Reed and the betrayers now in control of Monticello,... Read more
Published 19 months ago by verity
5.0 out of 5 stars
Finally the REAL TRUTH gets out to the public
Finally Prof. Turner has been able to complete this fine book, under research and deep study for about ten years, that completely exposes those who would DARE use the study of... Read more
Published 20 months ago by Herbert Barger
5.0 out of 5 stars
$335 For a Hard Copy?
This title is just coming off the press. It's too new to be 'used'. Amazon, charging $335 for a book available from the publisher for $40 (which includes a 10% internet... Read more
Published 20 months ago by Edward H. Ashment
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Listmania!
|
|
