The Judge in a Democracy and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy New
$28.09
Qty:1
  • List Price: $30.95
  • Save: $2.86 (9%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 6 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Trade in your item
Get a $1.17
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Judge in a Democracy Paperback – April 27, 2008

ISBN-13: 978-0691136158 ISBN-10: 0691136157

Buy New
Price: $28.09
30 New from $13.79 12 Used from $17.70
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
$28.09
$13.79 $17.70
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Frequently Bought Together

The Judge in a Democracy + Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and their Limitations (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law)
Price for both: $76.36

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 368 pages
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press (April 27, 2008)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0691136157
  • ISBN-13: 978-0691136158
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.3 x 0.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #743,179 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Aharon Barak [states] that it is precisely because judges are not politicians that they are the right people to undertake the constitutional role of ensuring that the legislature and the executive comply with legal requirements. . . . Barak points out that tension between the courts and other branches of government is natural and it is desirable. If the courts' decisions were always welcomed by the executive, judges would not be doing their job properly. Barak's thesis is . . . of fundamental importance."--David Pannick, Times of London

"Learned and perceptive, this work deserves the attention of any reader interested in the role that judges play, and ought to play, in a democratic republic."--Charles Gardner Geyh, Trial

"Barak sets out in a systematic way, the questions, dilemmas and solutions he has adopted as a judge. He notes the principles that should guide judges in a democratic society, when faced with constitutional questions that have implications over and above the specific concerns of the parties to a legal disput. . . . [E]ngaging and intellectually stimulating. . . . The Judge in a Democracy should be a must read in any course or research on judicial and constitutional politics."--Menachem Hofnung, Law and Politics Book Review

"Barak argues for striking a balance between the protection of human rights and the preservation of national security interests, but is most adamant in insisting that some degree of security might have to be sacrificed in order to preserve a nation's democratic essence.... Barak has done much to humanize the role of the judge. He describes the process of interpreting law as a profoundly human one, in which the adjudicator is constantly balancing, testing, agonizing."--Benjamin Soskis, Forward

"The Judge in a Democracy explains that there was nothing in either the US or the Israeli constitutions allowing judges to strike down acts of the legislature. Even so, he says, the courts in both countries have held that judicial review of legislation is implied by interpretation of the constitution."--Joshua Rozenberg, Daily Telegraph

"Presenting a remarkably balanced view of the power and limitations of judges, President Barak offers a comprehensive yet humble account of the role of the judiciary within a democratic society."--Harvard Law Review

"Barak's writing is not merely clear, it exudes the logical structure that the modern law endeavors, and often claims, to exhibit. . . . For the professional of law . . . Barak's book may serve as the beginning of a revealing look at the social role of the law."--Mathieu Deflem, European Legacy

From the Inside Flap

"This book offers a plethora of intriguing examples of practical reason in the service of an eclectic mix of justice ethically conceived and of law as a body of rules and principles that bind us even when power is lacking to enforce those norms. Few jurists in the world have regularly confronted the kinds of seemingly impossible conundrums that Barak has with amazing frequency managed to turn into surprisingly agreeable outcomes."--Laurence Tribe, Harvard University, author of American Constitutional Law

"A remarkable work by a remarkable jurist. A most important contribution to our understanding of the role of a judiciary in a democracy, this book will be of wide appeal to judges, legal scholars, and law students, as well as political theorists and others interested in the law and legal institutions."--Frank Iacobucci, retired Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada

"This book provides a candid and elaborate account by a leading supreme court justice on his craft of judging. Aharon Barak discusses some of the most important (and controversial) jurisprudential questions and demonstrates the ways in which he has put his convictions on these matters into action in shaping Israeli jurisprudence. As such, The Judge represents a valuable encounter of legal theory and judicial practice. Judges and scholars associated with new constitutional courts will find the book instructive. American judges and scholars, in turn, will see it as a powerful antithesis to the approach of another prominent jurist, Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court."--Hanoch Dagan, Tel-Aviv University Faculty of Law School, author of The Law and Ethics of Restitution

--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
1
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By Shalom Freedman HALL OF FAMETOP 1000 REVIEWER on July 12, 2007
Format: Hardcover
Aharon Barak recently retired from the position of Chief Justice of the Israeli Supreme Court. In this position he moved the Court to a more activist role than it had played in the past. And his critics charge him with having impinged upon the powers of both Executive and Legislative branches. Barak of course rejects these charges and maintains that one of the most important functions of the Judiciary in a Democracy is to preserve a separation of Powers.
Barak in this book speaks over and over again about the importance of 'objectivity' and 'neutrality' in judicial decision- making. But his major thrust is in explaining how he believes the Judicial branch must work both to preserve a Democracy's fundamental Constitutional values, and at the same time respond to social change in an appropriate way. The Law as he understands it is an ongoing developing system which must be in tune with the fundamental transformations a Society is undergoing.
Again Barak has been fiercely attacked by both sides of the poltiical spectrum in Israel. At the same time he has been applauded internationally as one of the finest judicial minds working today.
My own personal bias is with those who feel the Israeli Supreme Court has in the past few years gone beyond its own constitutional authority. I would fault it for not upholding certain fundamental rights , for instance freedom of worship in regard to Jewish Prayer on the Temple Mount.
But I also realize what Barak here writes frequently about the Judge's dilemna of being under conflicting imperatives, of needing to weighh for instance the right of a group for freedom of worship, against considerations of State Security.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback
The role of a judge in a democracy is one of Barak's favourite topics. He wrote and lectured on this subject many times, and in this book he compiled the main arguments, the result of years of careful thinking and of practicing law at the Israel Supreme Court.

Israel does not have a constitution or a Bill of Rights to defend basic rights and freedoms. Israel is a young democracy, poorly governed; it is riddled with corruption, and its existence has been under constant threat. You cannot really expect a country to be "normal" when once in a while it fights a war, and since 1987, with small intervals, it is subjected to constant terror attacks. The Supreme Court, under the leadership of Aharon Barak, was asked many times to interfere and to mete out justice to defend basic human rights. All the hot potatoes that no one else could not or did not wish to resolve came before the Court to decide. I often spoke with Justices of the Court who told me that they would rather not deal with those problematic, heated issues, but they had no other choice. Someone had to do the job, and in Israel, this "someone" is the High Court of Justice. The situation may change once Israel will be able to agree on a written constitution. Presently, Israel and the Palestinians living under Israeli occupation need to rely on the Court to find counsel and help in sorting grievances vis-à-vis the government, the army, and administration. Professor Barak, Israel's leading legal scholar, explains this delicate role, its challenges and rational, in this thoughtful book.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 9 people found the following review helpful By T. Harris on January 6, 2010
Format: Hardcover
I am appalled at the egregious mis-use above of a complimentary sentence from Judge Richard Posner's blistering review of both Aharon Barak's book and his ideology and behavior on the Court in The New Republic [...].

No one, not Judge Posner and certainly not I, disagrees that Aharon Barak is a very bright man; furthermore, his effective imposition of his own left-wing "politically correct" Weltanschauung on the Israeli public and its democratically elected representatives would undoubtedly earn him the undying admiration of the left-wing Norwegians who choose the recipients of the Nobel prize. Thus, as Posner wrote, were there a Nobel prize in law, Barak would likely be an early recipient.

And yet Posner entitles his review of this book "Enlightened Despot" for a very good reason, as is evident by reading the entire review. I cannot describe Barak's usurpation of power from the elected legislative branch nearly as well as Posner, and refer all to his article. But as a US-trained attorney admitted to both the New York and Israeli bar associations, I can't agree strongly enough with Judge Posner's conclusions that -- absent any justification under law or precedent in Israel or, to my knowledge, elsewhere, and absent a formal constitution, Judge Barak decided that we less enlightened citizens of Israel would henceforth be subject to HIS "rule of law" -- i.e., the vicissitudes of what he and the colleagues he picked and formed in his image deem to be "reasonable" in a particular case at a particular time. I.e., Barak subjected duly passed laws and administrative decisions not merely to the "reasonable man" test, but the "reasonable enlightened man" test as determined in the sole discretion of Aharon Barak and his fellow Ivory Tower dwelling, self-perpetuating Supreme Court Justices.

And democracy be damned.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?