Buy New
$15.20
Qty:1
  • List Price: $17.95
  • Save: $2.75 (15%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 10 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
Want it tomorrow, April 17? Order within and choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

The Lifespan of a Fact Paperback


Amazon Price New from Used from Collectible from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$15.20
$10.54 $5.69 $24.95

Frequently Bought Together

The Lifespan of a Fact + Reality Hunger: A Manifesto (Vintage)
Price for both: $27.01

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Image
Looking for the Audiobook Edition?
Tell us that you'd like this title to be produced as an audiobook, and we'll alert our colleagues at Audible.com. If you are the author or rights holder, let Audible help you produce the audiobook: Learn more at ACX.com.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 128 pages
  • Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company; 1 edition (February 27, 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0393340732
  • ISBN-13: 978-0393340730
  • Product Dimensions: 9 x 6.9 x 0.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 8.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (29 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #107,600 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

“...[H]ere is the genius of this little book, for as it progresses, D'Agata and Fingal turn everything around on us, until even our most basic assumptions are left unclear. Who says writers owe readers anything? Or that genre, such as it is, is a valid lens through which to consider literary work? ...[T]he book is "an enactment of the experience of trying to find meaning"— a vivid and reflective meditation on the nature of nonfiction as literary art.” (David L. Ulin - L.A. Times)

“A fascinating and dramatic power struggle over the intriguing question of what nonfiction should, or can, be.” (Lydia Davis)

“Very à propos in our era of spruced-up autobiography and fabricated reporting, this is a whip-smart, mordantly funny, thought-provoking rumination on journalistic responsibility and literary license.” (Publishers Weekly)

“A singularly important meditation on fact and fiction, the imagination and life, fidelity and freedom. Provocative, maddening, and compulsively readable, The Lifespan of a Fact pulses through a forest of detail to illuminate high-stakes, age-old questions about art and ethics—questions to which the book (blessedly!) provides no easy answers.” (Maggie Nelson)

...The Lifespan of a Fact... is less a book than a knock-down, drag-out fight between two tenacious combatants, over questions of truth, belief, history, myth, memory and forgetting.” (Jennifer McDonald - New York Times Book Review)

“A riveting essay delving into the arcane yet entertaining debate within the writing community over the relationship between truth and accuracy when writing creative nonfiction....” (Kirkus Reviews)

“...Thus begins the alternately absorbing and infuriating exercise that is the book The Lifespan of a Fact, a Talmudically arranged account of the conflict between Jim Fingal, zealous checker, and John D’Agata, nonfiction fabulist, which began in 2005 and resulted in this collaboration.” (Gideon Lewis-Kraus - New York Times Magazine)

“If you like compelling, emotional stories set in wild, business-friendly locales, this book delivers.” (Daniel Roberts - Fortune Magazine)

About the Author

John D’Agata is the author of About a Mountain, Halls of Fame and editor of The Next American Essay and The Lost Origins of the Essay. He teaches creative writing at the University of Iowa in Iowa City, where he lives.

Jim Fingal is now a software engineer and writer in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

More About the Author

John D'Agata is the author of "Halls of Fame," "About a Mountain," and editor of "The Next American Essay" and "The Lost Origins of the Essay." He teaches creative writing at the University of Iowa in Iowa City, where he lives.

Customer Reviews

John D'Agata is no Truman Capote.
Chris Roberts
A reader who expects to sit down and read this book from beginning to end will be lost and disappointed.
Peter S. Bradley
The result is an inspired, affecting work of art.
E Harris

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

30 of 35 people found the following review helpful By Bookety book on February 29, 2012
Format: Paperback
As usual, a negative reviewer is being disingenuous.

"los casas" is clearly a fan of John D'Agata (check out the comments to his review, where he recommends a D'Agata book) and because D'Agata comes off as a tool and liar in this book, los casas doesn't want you to read it.

In truth, Lifespan of a Fact is a wonderful, unique book. For anyone at all interested in "non-fiction" and the material you read in feature articles, this is an astounding, warts-and-all look at how it happens. Jim Fingal does a yeoman's effort to get the story right and D'Agata seems to want to undermine him at every turn. Some of their exchanges are simply hilarious. Even the ones that are just troubling are instructive. D'Agata is a writer not to be trusted, and Fingal calls him out on it again and again.

But what is best about this book is that it is unlike almost anything else you'll read. I don't know how it was ever published, given how it portrays the sausage-make process of fact checking. But I'm very glad it was.

This book is absolutely one of a kind and ought to be required reading for anyone wanting to write nonfiction.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful By takingadayoff TOP 500 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on March 8, 2012
Format: Paperback
The pre-publication hype about Lifespan of a Fact prepared me for a smackdown between the heroic fact-checker demanding truth and the artist who values his creative process above mere facts.

Who doesn't value truth, especially in nonfiction? But once I began reading the book, it didn't take long to start seeing essayist D'Agata's side of the story.

It also didn't take too long to start to suspect that the entire book was a set-up.

Co-author Jim Fingal introduces himself as an intern for the magazine that D'Agata has submitted an article to. He has been assigned to fact check the article and takes issue with the first few lines of the essay and D'Agata responds (it is ostensibly an e-mail correspondence) that he doesn't think a fact checker is necessary for his type of writing. Fingal checks with the editor (who remains unnamed) who seems exasperated with Fingal and tells Fingal to correspond with D'Agata directly. The rest of the dialogue is therefore between a supposedly young, inexperienced fact checker and the established writer.

Fingal picks at the essay word by word, and the fact checking quickly becomes a parody, an outrageous exaggeration. At one point, he even fact checks his own comments. He's also oddly sarcastic for an intern who claims to be new at his job. We are also to believe that he didn't read the entire article before he started fact-checking it. Once you read to the end of the article, some of what seem discrepancies are explained. I wondered why D'Agata continued to respond to him after Fingal became excruciatingly nitpicky and snarky. Or why D'Agata didn't contact the editor directly.

But they do continue the exchange, which we are told lasted seven years.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback
There are two ways to review this book: at face value, taking the book at its word; or once you know the entire backstory.

The book has an unconventional structure, with John D'Agata's essay on the page, surrounded by his "conversation" with fact-checker Jim Fingal. Read the essay from start-to-finish first.

Then, once you read the conversation, you will see the factual 'errors' throughout the essay, about a teenager who died after jumping off the Las Vegas Stratosphere tower. These errors would not have jumped out to you before. D'Agata's original narrative is full of detail, description, interviews and quotes, so it seems completely accurate and credible.

In fact, as Fingal discovers, D'Agata has taken numerous liberties with the facts - changing "pink" to "purple" because he wanted the extra "beat" that purple provides. Or by "punching up" various quotes. D'Agata doesn't explicitly change the factual meaning, but he mixes, matches and changes to serve his literary purposes.

Fingal, apparently offended, does yeoman's work to break down every inaccuracy no matter how seemingly insignificant. So if D'Agata says "he walked on a red brick driveway," Fingal checks and says, "the driveway was brown."

At first, a reader might be taken aback by these factual liberties - after all, the original essay was considered nonfiction.

But, D'Agata's position (I wouldn't call it a defense, because he doesn't accept the opposing argument) is that as an 'essayist' he owes the reader an artistic experience, not 100 percent factual accuracy. That his job is to the story, not as a journalist, and that "nonfiction" as a category is a fairly new concept, while "essays" (defined as "an attempt") have been around for hundreds of years.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By E Harris on March 2, 2013
Format: Paperback
I don't tend to believe that altering facts for the sake of narrative beauty is a good idea in nonfiction or even any genre, but I find myself forced to admit that The Lifespan of a Fact is, amazingly, a fascinating work, even to those with little sympathy for the author's case. When I first heard about this project, I couldn't see what D'Agata was hoping to gain from its publication, since he could only come off badly (as he has, unfailingly, in almost every review). In reality, however, the book is far more interesting than the insidery debate that its back cover promises, and D'Agata has some surprising tricks up his sleeve.

It's true that D'Agata's original essay, which centers on the suicide of a teenager named Levi Presley, who jumped from the observation deck of the Stratosphere Hotel in Las Vegas on July 13, 2002, has a lot of problems. While the essay is expertly crafted, its familiar beats--the lists of curious information, the eye for incongruous detail--are artfully arranged to cover up the fact that the author doesn't have much to say about Levi's death. Yet the book that D'Agata has constructed around it is exactly what the essay tried and failed to be: a hybrid form, a centaur, that challenges and rewards the attentive reader. And the differences here are revealing. The original article was disguised as a piece of journalism, but the book comes to us explicitly as something new: its ambitions are visible at a glance, and it clearly lays out its own rules and constraints, even as it quietly undermines them.

The first twist is that Fingal, the factchecker, who has generally been portrayed as a calm voice of reason, often comes off as equally unhinged.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Product Images from Customers

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search
ARRAY(0xa4250bc4)

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?