Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
The Lifespan of a Fact Paperback – February 27, 2012
Top 20 lists in Books
View the top 20 best sellers of all time, the most reviewed books of all time and some of our editors' favorite picks. Learn more
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
“A fascinating and dramatic power struggle over the intriguing question of what nonfiction should, or can, be.” (Lydia Davis)
“Very à propos in our era of spruced-up autobiography and fabricated reporting, this is a whip-smart, mordantly funny, thought-provoking rumination on journalistic responsibility and literary license.” (Publishers Weekly)
“A singularly important meditation on fact and fiction, the imagination and life, fidelity and freedom. Provocative, maddening, and compulsively readable, The Lifespan of a Fact pulses through a forest of detail to illuminate high-stakes, age-old questions about art and ethics―questions to which the book (blessedly!) provides no easy answers.” (Maggie Nelson)
“...The Lifespan of a Fact... is less a book than a knock-down, drag-out fight between two tenacious combatants, over questions of truth, belief, history, myth, memory and forgetting.” (Jennifer McDonald - New York Times Book Review)
“A riveting essay delving into the arcane yet entertaining debate within the writing community over the relationship between truth and accuracy when writing creative nonfiction....” (Kirkus Reviews)
“...Thus begins the alternately absorbing and infuriating exercise that is the book The Lifespan of a Fact, a Talmudically arranged account of the conflict between Jim Fingal, zealous checker, and John D’Agata, nonfiction fabulist, which began in 2005 and resulted in this collaboration.” (Gideon Lewis-Kraus - New York Times Magazine)
“If you like compelling, emotional stories set in wild, business-friendly locales, this book delivers.” (Daniel Roberts - Fortune Magazine)
About the Author
Jim Fingal is now a software engineer and writer in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
More About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
"los casas" is clearly a fan of John D'Agata (check out the comments to his review, where he recommends a D'Agata book) and because D'Agata comes off as a tool and liar in this book, los casas doesn't want you to read it.
In truth, Lifespan of a Fact is a wonderful, unique book. For anyone at all interested in "non-fiction" and the material you read in feature articles, this is an astounding, warts-and-all look at how it happens. Jim Fingal does a yeoman's effort to get the story right and D'Agata seems to want to undermine him at every turn. Some of their exchanges are simply hilarious. Even the ones that are just troubling are instructive. D'Agata is a writer not to be trusted, and Fingal calls him out on it again and again.
But what is best about this book is that it is unlike almost anything else you'll read. I don't know how it was ever published, given how it portrays the sausage-make process of fact checking. But I'm very glad it was.
This book is absolutely one of a kind and ought to be required reading for anyone wanting to write nonfiction.
Who doesn't value truth, especially in nonfiction? But once I began reading the book, it didn't take long to start seeing essayist D'Agata's side of the story.
It also didn't take too long to start to suspect that the entire book was a set-up.
Co-author Jim Fingal introduces himself as an intern for the magazine that D'Agata has submitted an article to. He has been assigned to fact check the article and takes issue with the first few lines of the essay and D'Agata responds (it is ostensibly an e-mail correspondence) that he doesn't think a fact checker is necessary for his type of writing. Fingal checks with the editor (who remains unnamed) who seems exasperated with Fingal and tells Fingal to correspond with D'Agata directly. The rest of the dialogue is therefore between a supposedly young, inexperienced fact checker and the established writer.
Fingal picks at the essay word by word, and the fact checking quickly becomes a parody, an outrageous exaggeration. At one point, he even fact checks his own comments. He's also oddly sarcastic for an intern who claims to be new at his job. We are also to believe that he didn't read the entire article before he started fact-checking it. Once you read to the end of the article, some of what seem discrepancies are explained. I wondered why D'Agata continued to respond to him after Fingal became excruciatingly nitpicky and snarky. Or why D'Agata didn't contact the editor directly.
But they do continue the exchange, which we are told lasted seven years.Read more ›
The book has an unconventional structure, with John D'Agata's essay on the page, surrounded by his "conversation" with fact-checker Jim Fingal. Read the essay from start-to-finish first.
Then, once you read the conversation, you will see the factual 'errors' throughout the essay, about a teenager who died after jumping off the Las Vegas Stratosphere tower. These errors would not have jumped out to you before. D'Agata's original narrative is full of detail, description, interviews and quotes, so it seems completely accurate and credible.
In fact, as Fingal discovers, D'Agata has taken numerous liberties with the facts - changing "pink" to "purple" because he wanted the extra "beat" that purple provides. Or by "punching up" various quotes. D'Agata doesn't explicitly change the factual meaning, but he mixes, matches and changes to serve his literary purposes.
Fingal, apparently offended, does yeoman's work to break down every inaccuracy no matter how seemingly insignificant. So if D'Agata says "he walked on a red brick driveway," Fingal checks and says, "the driveway was brown."
At first, a reader might be taken aback by these factual liberties - after all, the original essay was considered nonfiction.
But, D'Agata's position (I wouldn't call it a defense, because he doesn't accept the opposing argument) is that as an 'essayist' he owes the reader an artistic experience, not 100 percent factual accuracy. That his job is to the story, not as a journalist, and that "nonfiction" as a category is a fairly new concept, while "essays" (defined as "an attempt") have been around for hundreds of years.Read more ›
It's true that D'Agata's original essay, which centers on the suicide of a teenager named Levi Presley, who jumped from the observation deck of the Stratosphere Hotel in Las Vegas on July 13, 2002, has a lot of problems. While the essay is expertly crafted, its familiar beats--the lists of curious information, the eye for incongruous detail--are artfully arranged to cover up the fact that the author doesn't have much to say about Levi's death. Yet the book that D'Agata has constructed around it is exactly what the essay tried and failed to be: a hybrid form, a centaur, that challenges and rewards the attentive reader. And the differences here are revealing. The original article was disguised as a piece of journalism, but the book comes to us explicitly as something new: its ambitions are visible at a glance, and it clearly lays out its own rules and constraints, even as it quietly undermines them.
The first twist is that Fingal, the factchecker, who has generally been portrayed as a calm voice of reason, often comes off as equally unhinged.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
About a Mountain is great, and who wants to read about it being undermined? It's a fascinating idea for a book (exchange between fact checking intern and author), but when you're... Read morePublished 27 days ago by Uliina Koivula
The Lifespan of a Fact is a battle of wills between a writer, D’ Agata, of a submitted essay in which he has admittedly taken “liberties… here and there, but none of them are... Read morePublished 1 month ago by Raymond M. Wong
It's a Hunger Games for smart people. No hero is left standing.Published 3 months ago by Rebecca Packard
Read it for a class, would not have read it otherwise. Mixed feelings since the point was to show the real back and forth between a factchecker and a writer, but it seems that the... Read morePublished 4 months ago by Dawn to dusk
As a journalism major, I found the idea of the conflict between these two kinds of "truths" to be very interesting. Read morePublished 7 months ago by Margaret Carmel
This is not a book. It is an excuse for a book. The entire essay should have been presented right at the beginning so the reader can go through it and understand both the form... Read morePublished 13 months ago by Allison
The concept of this book is cool. I purchased it to use in my English Composition course, but it doesn't really seem to go beyond the examples of factual inaccuracy/fact checking. Read morePublished 16 months ago by Ryler Dustin
Theway the book is organized is not like a normal book. The center of the page has a famous essay by D'Agada and the text outside the center is the conversation between d'Agada and... Read morePublished 23 months ago by erik Castillo
I can't decide if this little satire serves as a thought provoking exercise on what is knowable OR goes too far and winds up slyly justifying, and yet apologizing for, sloppy... Read morePublished on February 4, 2014 by hh