Sell yours for a Gift Card
We'll buy it for $14.91
Learn More
Trade in now
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

The Myth of the Eastern Front: The Nazi-Soviet War in American Popular Culture Paperback – November 5, 2007

ISBN-13: 978-0521712316 ISBN-10: 0521712319

8 New from $33.04 9 Used from $32.07
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
$33.04 $32.07
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Holiday Deals in Books
Holiday Deals in Books
Find deals for every reader in the Holiday Deals in Books store, featuring savings of up to 50% on cookbooks, children's books, literature & fiction, and more.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 336 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press (November 5, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0521712319
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521712316
  • Product Dimensions: 6.1 x 0.8 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (26 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #326,482 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews


"Ronald Smelser and Edward Davies vividly show how the pernicious idea of an honorable German war on the Eastern Front permeated the American consciousness with devastating consequences not only for the broad understanding of German atrocities in the East, but ultimately for the Cold War itself. From its lucid discussion of the former Hitler generals who whitewashed their military records after World War II to its disturbing look at the self-proclaimed gurus of army minutia who still pose as authorities on the Wehrmacht, The Myth of the Eastern Front is a masterful and incisive combination of military and cultural history."
-Norman J.W. Goda, Ohio University

"The swiftness with which Cold War America embraced vanquished Nazi officers, along with their sanitization of Wehrmacht criminality on the Eastern Front, is a chilling reminder of how historical memory often follows the flag. Ronald Smelser and Edward Davies have performed a signal service in bringing to light the internet's perpetuation of self-serving myths about World War Two. Whether Waffen-SS reenactors and Nazibilia collectors represent harmless playacting or something more sinister only time will tell. But anything that traffics in half-truths, and worse, especially concerning matters of grave moral concern, can't be taken lightly."
-Lawrence N. Powell, Tulane University

"A superb and insightful study of the premeditated manipulation of history and memory in the fabrication of the myth of a "clean Wehrmacht." Expertly exposes the intersection and influence of popular imagination, politics, and popular culture in the rewriting of the German army's experience in World War Two."
Edward B. Westermann, author of Hitler's Police Battalions: Enforcing Racial War in the East

"Recommended." -Choice

"Smelser and Davies need to be commended for their fascinating and detailed study." -Journal of American History, Gerd Horten

Book Description

From the 1950s onward, Cold War-era Americans were receptive to a view of World War II similar to the view held by many Germans and military personnel on how the war was fought on the Eastern front in Russia. A broad subculture of German military enthusiasts continues to romanticize the German army to this day.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Like already mentioned above the authors set forth a worthy and testable thesis.
Mannie Liscum
The authors also assume that the readers of these books and participants in these hobbies do not do any other research or reading outside of the items presented here.
Anyone interested in either the Soviet-German War or the nature of historiography in general should read this book.
Jonathan M. House

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

83 of 101 people found the following review helpful By M. Kirschenbaum on December 25, 2007
Format: Paperback
The book argues that a sanitized and romanticized narrative of the German conduct of the war on the eastern front has been popularized in the West, as a result of a variety of factors including Cold War politics, the writings of key German commanders, and the diffusion of this narrative through a broader subculture which includes military historians and hobbyists, internet enthusiasts, wargamers, and reenactors. The book expends a lot of space on the visual imagery associated with these groups, for example book jackets and wargame box art which glorifies/romanticizes the German cause. This is generally a kind of argument I am sympathetic toward, since a book or game cover is an expression of marketing and self-identity.

At the same time, as sympathetic as I am to the basis thesis and premise of the book, I find the execution clumsy and less compelling than it might be. What the authors don't mention, for example, is that the bias toward Nazi/SS imagery is already well known in the wargaming community, is often critiqued, and is sometimes aggressively countered, for example Adam Starkweather's cover choices for his various east front games (available through Multiman Publishing, the same company which markets various other games that come under fire in the book). Nor do the authors delve into game design and mechanics to examine whether or not actual systems are biased toward a German viewpoint. There's no doubt that there are lots of people who think Tiger tanks and Panzerfausts are cool; then again, most of us also found Darth Vader much cooler than Luke Skywalker.
Read more ›
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
25 of 31 people found the following review helpful By Nick Dowling on August 29, 2009
Format: Paperback
There's lots of scope to write a great book how the west came to view the Eastern Front through German perspectives and overlook the German Army's war crimes, but this isn't it. A key flaw is that the authors never really set out how they think that the war should be seen and how the common Western accounts differ from this. Instead, they use a mish-mash of bits of information which don't seem to have been very rigorously selected or given a consistent weight to argue their case. This leads to the book's central argument being under-developed and, unfortunately given the importance of the topic, unconvincing. Moreover, the book feels dated - despite being published in 2007, the section on the internet talks about how many websites looked in 1999(!) and doesn't discuss whether they've since changed and there's not much on the recent serious scholarship and popular works which have been written on the Eastern Front.

Another flaw is that the book is fairly one-sided and focused on the more extreme fringe of authors. When discussing how German perspectives came to dominate how the Eastern Front is viewed in the west the authors don't discuss the quality and availability of Soviet histories and sources - both were highly problematic and acted as a barrier to western historians being able to tell the Soviet side of the story until the end of the Cold War. The focus on fringe publications about the war is also problematic - these appear to be aimed at a fairly selective audience and aren't easily available, so their influence is likely to be minor compared to the popular histories of the war, which go largely unexamined.

In short, this book doesn't deliver what it promised, and was highly disappointing.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
34 of 43 people found the following review helpful By cpt matt VINE VOICE on January 30, 2011
Format: Paperback
Well, author Edward Davies and I have some things in common- we both read and collected war books & novels in our youth, played Avalon Hill board games, we're both from PA. The authors argue that America has been brainwashed by the Germans who created a myth that there was a `clean war' fought against the Russians.

I'm ok with most of the early chapters contents which outline how and why the US/British began to separate `good soldiers' from the SS and Nazis. It was pragmatic and needed, since the Soviets became our enemies in the Cold War. It is a fundamental aspect of war that you have to know your enemy. Of course we would study what the Germans did and made them effective. It is very difficult to separate politics from those who have to wage the war, and I agree that it is important that we remember this as we study the weapons, tactics, and experiences of Germany in WW2. Serious historians know what the Nazis did and the horrors they unleashed on the world, not just the Russians. Or should we call them Soviets - 30 million Russian people died in WW2, a significant portion of them by the Soviet secret police or a result of Stalin's policies and purges.

I do think it's good to remember that and understand that a lot of the German leaders were Nazis, followed Hitler, knew what was going on, and profited from the Nazi regime. Of interest, it was a running joke with my fellow tankers stationed in Germany in the 80's - every German ex-soldier we met fought on the eastern front - never against the Americans of course. I also admit I get insulted when some Germans said "we did not know what was going on with regard to the concentration camps". I have far more respect for those who admit they knew, but also admitted the hopelessness of fighting the regime.
Read more ›
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?