The Nativity: History and Legend and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
$4.00
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Solid used copy with visible wear to covers. May contain underlines or highlights. Ships directly to you with tracking from Amazon's warehouse - fast, secure and FREE WITH AMAZON PRIME.
Add to Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Nativity: History and Legend Hardcover – November 6, 2007


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$4.46 $0.01

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Image
Looking for the Audiobook Edition?
Tell us that you'd like this title to be produced as an audiobook, and we'll alert our colleagues at Audible.com. If you are the author or rights holder, let Audible help you produce the audiobook: Learn more at ACX.com.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 192 pages
  • Publisher: Doubleday Religion (November 6, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 038552241X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0385522410
  • Product Dimensions: 8.3 x 5.7 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,108,818 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Despite the cover's gold-stamped Old English script and stylized medieval Nativity scene, this book does not belong in a display of inspirational Christmas gifts for great-aunts, unless the aunties are willing to consider that Matthew and Luke often contradict each other; that Jesus was probably born in the spring; that virgin may simply have meant prepubescent; that the census that supposedly brought Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem never happened (and anyway, Jesus was more likely born in Nazareth); or that virgin births and guiding stars were quite common in classical literature of the time. As Vermes notes, the truth ...belongs only very slightly to history and mostly derives from man's hopeful and creative religious imagination. Vermes, perhaps the world's foremost authority on the Dead Sea Scrolls, writes as a scholar, not as an iconoclast. Dismayed that Christmas has become the climax of a season of overspending, overeating and uncontrolled merrymaking, he wants to set the record straight. Some readers, however-even those who value understanding the first-century historical and literary context-may not be satisfied with his conclusion that the ultimate purpose of the Infancy Gospels seems to be the creation of a prologue, enveloping the newborn Jesus with an aura of marvel and enigma. (Nov. 6)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Review

Praise for Geza Vermes and The Nativity

“The greatest Jesus scholar of his generation.” —Sunday Telegraph (UK)

“Vermes sets about painstaking literary and historical analysis with refreshing humor and enthusiasm and argues his case with clarity and skill as he uncovers how the events of the nativity were constructed by evangelists to fulfill Old Testament prophecies and Jewish traditions.” —The Guardian (UK)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
5
4 star
4
3 star
0
2 star
1
1 star
1
See all 11 customer reviews
A good read by a scholar who knows what he is talking about.
Daniel
Mr. Vermes does a good job of showing how Matthew and Luke were making up stories to solve the problems of the prophets predictions.
dave1
Outstanding in every sense, deep,thorough knowledge of topic and truly excellent style of writing.
Joseph R. Hausner

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

14 of 14 people found the following review helpful By Pieter Uys HALL OF FAME on November 17, 2007
Format: Hardcover
Here the respected scholar investigates the main events surrounding the nativity in an attempt to establish what really happened. He compares Christmas in Christian imagery with the gospel accounts of Matthew and Luke, which are contradictory and confusing in many aspects. They agree on only a few basic points but there are many complications and discrepancies. Vermes looks at how various Christian scholars deal with this, for example John P Meier in A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus and Raymond Brown in Birth of the Messiah.

The author performs a textual interpretation and analyses the evidence. Then the findings are compared to all relevant information from parallel Jewish documents and sources of literature and history, including the Dead Sea Scrolls. First the genealogies of Jesus in the aforementioned gospels are compared (including a side by side comparison) and Vermes succeeds in making even this subject absorbing in light of the strange discrepancies.

Next he looks at the concept of miraculous births in Judaism and Paganism: virginal conception, extraordinary birth stories in the Old Testament and the weird account in Genesis 6 that talks of celestial beings interbreeding with mankind that gave rise to a race of giants. The Hellenistic Jewish birth stories of the writer Philo are also considered.

Chapter Five: Virgin and Holy Spirit, explores the gospel accounts with the prophecy of Isaiah concerning a young woman who would give birth to a son.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful By Dr. James Gardner VINE VOICE on February 5, 2008
Format: Hardcover
Noted scholar Geza Vermes focuses his attention on the nativity stories about Jesus, in a fashion similar to his 2006 book The Passion. He covers such topics as where and when Jesus was born, where he lived, who his father and brothers were, etc. Along the way he makes several excursions into such related topics as Jewish marriage practices in the 1st century, the two meanings of the word "virgin", etc.

The text is well written, although at times I thought it rambled, and there is no coherent organization, although at the end of the day, he covers just about every topic one can imagine. The notes are sparce and the bibliography ever sparcer, but one nonetheless gets the feeling that Vermes speaks with authority.

While this is certainly a very interesting book, people familiar with the literature will not find much new here. But for a beginning student this will be very informative.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Jason Engwer on December 22, 2013
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
I've read the 2006 hard cover edition of Geza Vermes' book. I don't know if any significant changes were made in later editions.

Vermes refers to his book as thorough (16), one that takes into account "all the relevant information" from a large variety of fields (16-17), and "painstaking" (145). But the book is only 172 pages long, has only two pages of endnotes (159-160), has a two-page bibliography characterized by liberal and moderate sources (161-162), makes many highly dubious assertions without supporting argumentation, makes little effort to interact with conservative scholarship, and doesn't break any significant new ground.

He refers to the elements of the infancy narratives that have "a high degree of probability" as "the names and the place of residence of the child and the parents, but the date of birth could only be approximate, under Herod, and the locale controverted, Bethlehem according to tradition, but more likely Nazareth." (155-156) He ignores the best evidence for a Bethlehem birthplace. And his inclusion of so few items in the highly probable category is absurd. What about the premarital timing of Mary's pregnancy, something highly unlikely to have been made up by the early Christians? What about the earliness of the move to Nazareth, even though Matthew and/or Luke could so easily have placed the move later in Jesus' life? And so on.

Despite Vermes' ridiculous claim that the infancy accounts "agree only on a few basic points" (10), they actually agree on dozens. I recently wrote an article for my blog giving thirty examples of agreements between Matthew and Luke regarding Jesus' childhood, and more examples could have been included.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Daniel on May 17, 2010
Format: Hardcover
Short summary:

The book is essentially a commentary on the Infancy Gospels found in Matthew and Luke. Vermes carefully looks at these passages from all different angles and can be said to deconstruct the passages as we have them by employing the historical-critical method. He compares elements and themes to Jewish & Greek literature of the time and draws some suprising and less suprising results. In his view the Infancy Gospels have been added later to the Gospels as they stand and conflict greatly among each other. To be sure he finds some similarities but on the whole they are different and contain in some places contradictory ideas.

He spends most of his time highlighting these differences and probes to what the reasons behind these are. He sees Matthew's Infancy Gospel as being mainly driven by the idea that Jesus is the new Moses and offers various extra-Biblical readings that show some suprising parallels to the Gospel. Luke, in his opinion, concerns a miraculous birth along the lines we find in the Hebrew Bible (Sarah, Rebecca, etc.), he argues that Mary conceived Jesus, with the help of Joseph, before this was physically possible (before her first period).

My thoughts:

In general I like Historical Jesus studies in the tradition of Geza Vermes, E.P. Sanders, Paula Fredriksen, etc. They tend to be very critical and leave little trace of feeling bound to dogma. Sometimes though they can be overly critical and especially with Vermes I get this idea. Reading him at times makes me feel he is frustrated with more conservative readings. But given that this works both ways and that it does not distract the reader from his main message, its fine with me.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?