Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America's Politics Paperback – September 30, 1980

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
$2,432.64 $0.01

Product Details

  • Paperback: 336 pages
  • Publisher: Touchstone (September 30, 1980)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0671413848
  • ISBN-13: 978-0671413842
  • Product Dimensions: 8.2 x 5.1 x 1.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,536,623 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5 of 12 people found the following review helpful By James R. Maclean on August 18, 2006
Format: Paperback
Once upon a time the term "neo-conservative" was applied to people like Daniel Bell, Nathan Glazer, Irving Kristol, Edward C. Banfield, Gertrude Himmelfarb, Robert Solow, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and Michael Novak. It's hard to associate this group with the likes of Richard Perle and David Frum, authors of *An End to Evil*; whereas the latter string together a parody of pop bromides, the former had impressive intellectual credentials.

Steinfels uses a definition of neo-conservatives that is now fairly out of date. Partly this is because what began as little more than a genre of political thought in the 1950's was not yet unified by thinktank politics. He does not mention the philosopher Leo Strauss once, although there is something of a legend that neo-conservatives are apostles of him; nor is Albert Wohlstetter. That's because the neo-conservatives were not openly linked with military planners or philosophers like Harlan Ullman or Robert Kagan.

Also surprising is the relative dearth of former Trotskyists like Max Shachtman or Jeane Kirkpatrick; neither is discussed. Irving Kristol and Nathan Glazer are, but only in a "how about that?" sort of way, or without comment. This is possibly a good thing, since Strauss' extremely odious philosophy is not terribly necessary for understanding the gist of the neo-conservative outlook. They are certainly compatible, but since neo-conservative polemics is more a slosh of literary cant than a coherent philosophy anyway, this is not as important as it appears to some.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images