The Ostrich Factor: Our Population Myopia and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Qty:1
  • List Price: $45.00
  • Save: $7.95 (18%)
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Acceptable | Details
Condition: Used: Acceptable
Comment: Fast Shipping - Safe and Secure Bubble Mailer!
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Ostrich Factor: Our Population Myopia Hardcover – April 15, 1999

ISBN-13: 000-0195122747 ISBN-10: 0195122747

Buy New
Price: $37.05
26 New from $15.94 38 Used from $0.01
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$37.05
$15.94 $0.01
Paperback
"Please retry"
Take%20an%20Extra%2030%25%20Off%20Any%20Book

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Take an Extra 30% Off Any Book: Use promo code HOLIDAY30 at checkout to get an extra 30% off any book for a limited time. Excludes Kindle eBooks and Audible Audiobooks. Restrictions apply. Learn more.


Frequently Bought Together

The Ostrich Factor: Our Population Myopia + Maybe One: A Case for Smaller Families
Price for both: $52.35

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 176 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press (April 15, 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0195122747
  • ISBN-13: 978-0195122749
  • Product Dimensions: 5.5 x 0.9 x 8.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #945,277 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Because overpopulation poses such a grave threat to the planet's sustainable economic future, and because voluntary measures to curb population don't work, we will soon be forced to abandon our head-in-the-sand stance and adopt some form of coercive constraints on individuals' "unqualified reproductive rights." Or so argues Hardin (Living Within Limits), professor emeritus of human ecology at U.C.-Santa Barbara, in a collection of accessible, if academic, essays that venture some highly unfashionable proposals. Hardin suggests that every person should be required to carry an identity card "to put a stop to America's race toward multiculturalism," which he sees as a misguided movement that fosters cultural and political balkanization. He ridicules One Worlders' ideal of global government, arguing that such a system would be more likely to lead to chaos than our present multinational world of balanced antagonisms. Affirmative action, in his withering critique, is an overreaction to racism, a program that "turned out to be racism with a different name" and that often fails to supply the level of skills that jobs demand. Hardin also favors sharp restrictions on immigration, high tariff walls and a reversal of the current economic thinking that, he says, nurtures the illusion that perpetual growth is possible. The "ecological economics" Hardin embraces would force us to choose ethically among limitless demands in a world of finite resources. Throughout these blunt, open-ended essays, the author invokes a visiting, wholly rational Martian, not clouded by human passions, who surveys Earth's corrupt, self-destructive governments and offers a pro-population-control Martian sonnet, "To Malthus." Many readers will doubtless find some of Hardin's notions alarmist, but he airs unorthodox views that could conceivably be on the table tomorrow.
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

Hardin (human ecology, emeritus, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara), founder of the field of human ecology, has written a learned, witty, and controversial book evaluating contemporary ethical assumptions regarding population planning and world population growth. By examining difficult societal questions, Hardin illustrates how ethics and economics are being transformed by ecology. His book examines questions of jurisprudence, including the place of natural law, the difference between equality and equity, and the role of greed as expressed through survival of the fittest. Hardin believes that one of the most difficult tasks for humanity will be the acceptance of limited resources. He argues for community-sensitive restrictions, produced by mutual coercion, as a means to limit population growth. Although the book is intended for a general audience, difficult economic concepts and profound ethical, sociological, and philosophical questions may limit readership. Recommended for academic libraries and special collections in religion, ethics, sociology, ecology, and economics.?Margaret Ann Aycock, Gulf Coast Environmental Lib., Beaumont, TX
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Unfortunately this unreadable book widely misses the mark.
Nathan Kennedy
As Hardin sees it we really need to understand that "no two human beings are created equal" (p. 109) and that "equity" and "equality" are not the same thing.
Dennis Littrell
If this paragraph strikes you as absurd and irresponsible than you can find better, more reliable sources of information.
Melanie D. Typaldos

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful By Dennis Littrell HALL OF FAMETOP 1000 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on May 7, 2002
Format: Hardcover
The central argument of this book is that we are ostriches with our heads in the sand unable to face our problems because facing them would entail confronting taboo, which is socially and politically impossible (at least within earshot of anybody). But Professor Hardin, who is the author of Stalking the Wild Taboo, finds a way around the forbidden by creating a man from Mars who can be objective where we cannot, allowing Hardin to express the taboo point of view. For example on page 106 he has the Martian say (referring to the organization, Zero Population Growth): "it is virtually unheard of outside the learned community... [I]n the long run, it will decrease the relative number of educated people compared with the uneducated." The Martian adds, "Propaganda in favor of reducing fertility must be accompanied by repressive legal measures... Perhaps the first thing to do would be to cancel income deductions for the third child in a family (and beyond)." Hardin himself obliquely gives his point of view on page 61 with these words, "The natural sciences have probably made it possible for millions--probably not billions--of human beings to live sustainably on the earth."
While I (and the natural resources of the planet) would welcome a world with say six hundred million people as opposed to six billion, I must disagree with the man from Mars about the educated and the uneducated. I suspect, regardless of actual numbers, their proportions would stay approximately the same.
However most of this book is not about overpopulation, but about political and economic issues that Professor Hardin is pleased to expound on. There is the problem of "Equity, Equality, and Affirmative Action" (Chapter 14). As Hardin sees it we really need to understand that "no two human beings are created equal" (p.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful By Callida on June 29, 1999
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I loved Hardin's previous book, "Living with Limits" which I found hard hitting, concise and spot-on with its criticisms of unchecked population growth. So I started reading "The Ostrich Factor" with high hopes, but was ultimately disappointed. To me the book seemed to consist of long and sometimes rambling justifications for why we must come to accept some restriction on the right of individuals to produce as many children as they want. I had already accepted this proposition which was why I bought the book, and didn't need to be convinced. I was hoping to see a discussion of the different ways that this "democratic coercion" may be applied, and a consideration of the practicalities, ethics and long-term implications of each.
Is it something to do with me not being American? Not that the cult of the individual isn't big in Oz too, and I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing, but I don't have any problem with the idea that individual rights cannot continue to run rampant once they start to damage the world that we all depend upon, and obliterate the other species with whom we share it. Surely there are plenty of educated, thinking people who have come to the same conclusion? I found myself frustrated with Hardin's seeming assumption that this was the ultimate taboo which needed to be elaborately justified at every step, at the expense of an in-depth discussion of the practical side of population control.
Good criticisms of current economic theory and immigration policy, but nothing I haven't read before. I finished the book feeling that I was little the wiser about how a large-scale system of "mutually coercive" population control might occur.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful By Douglas Grubbs on June 17, 2000
Format: Hardcover
This book has more in it than meets the eye and it infers many things that readers may not pick up on. One of the ideas I thought was useful not just for the population problem but for many other problems that humas are facing his his ideas about all the investments in failure that we are making in many of our "solutions". I think Hardin implies the solution which is that limits have to be set and that our basic ancient mythology which was set at a time when population growth was extreemly useful is now no longer useful. His solution is to argue this point again and again because so many people still have their heads in the sand. Until people can come to some of the realities of our world population problem it is pointless to try to implement any solution which those with their heads in the sand will continue to oppose. His solution is very difficult to swallow for people who are holding on to the ideals of the past which are now fatal so this book is very vital. I like that he leaves it to the inventiveness of the reader to pursue the results of his findings. Details about any of his infered solutions are not in this book. This book is a work of genious from someone who has been in the field of population control for over 30 years. He knows what he's up to. He opens up so many possibilities for creative readers or political thinkers. His ideas on coercion, equality, multiculturalism, and altruism will be invaluable for any solution to take place. This book is just brimming with discussions and it makes for a great book for a class to read and discuss which is what I think Hardin ment it for mostly to be used in his classes and used to launch many discussions. That is why is is so bare in many ways and leaves the conclusions up to the reader. The thing I dislike about the book the most is that the inside cover says "sure to spark controversy." It just goes to show how many in our society have there heads in the sand!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?