As a white, conservative, thirty-something male I find much to disagree with in Mr Kennedy's book, "The Persistence of the Color Line." After all, Mr Kennedy does "demand that he [President Obama] governs as progressively [i.e. in keeping with Democratic ideology] as circumstances will allow." (pg 274) In many ways I found the book to be judgmental - often referring to conservative views as "indecent," (p 23) or immoral - the book was also not organized particularly well, and the central thesis often seemed hard to elucidate.
Yet I give this book five stars. Why? Because we need people like Mr. Kennedy - who for all his talk about race in this book never made me feel like he was being unfair. His repeated attempts to be fair minded earned him my respect. I never found myself doubting the veracity of what he said, only disagreeing with his analysis in places. And in many places I found myself sympathetic to his viewpoint as a consequence.
Indeed, on the subject of race it can be hard not to feel defensive. I find myself editing the foregoing sentence, "earned him my respect," to "earned him my respect as an author." I changed my mind. After all, I would not have to clarify that in any other circumstance. Yet it is that kind of thing that has dogged President Obama's candidacy and occupancy of the White House. Nearly everything said is analyzed in the context of race. And it is this issue that seems to be the uniting theme of this excellent work.
The first chapter discusses the inaugural celebration and spends some time discussing black electoral politics up until Obama's candidacy.*
The second and third chapters discuss how Obama has gained the vote of the African American vote and the White vote. Many African Americans did not at first support his candidacy due either to the fact that he never courted the black leadership in the traditional way or out of a desire to keep him from being assassinated literally or figuratively. (I remember praying that he would not be assassinated as well - there are always some crazies out there.) Some opposed him ideologically. In the end, about 98% of blacks voted for him, even prominent conservatives like Colin Powell.
To convince whites, says Kennedy, he had to go out of his way to make sure to avoid racial topics, support for affirmative action, and made sure to never seem bitter over race issues. As noted later in the book Obama obtained 43% of the white vote (p 251), not much different from various other democratic candidates such as Clinton, Kerry, or Gore. He discusses Obama's famous speech on race, which I loved, but which Kennedy feels rather lukewarm about. My mother spent much of her summers in a tent since they couldn't afford to live indoors. I suffer from a crippling illness which leaves me in pain everyday. President Obama pointed out that people everywhere have a hard time, not just non-whites. He recognized, as few liberals do, how painful it is to many to be accused of racism with casual indifference.
I think Kennedy here and in other parts of the book fails to give sufficient credence to how important this process was of convincing white Americans that if elected Obama would represent them as well. Blacks after all have their own black caucus, the NAACP, etc., which see the world as inherently unfair towards blacks (rightly or wrongly), and prefer to spend their time on black issues. Given the history of American race relations and the awful treatment of blacks at various times and places, it is not entirely unexpected for some blacks (like the author's father) to hate whites, however unfair it may or may not be, but nor is it unreasonable for whites to desire a president who will not promote policies to their detriment, as for instance, affirmative action inevitably does - and to his credit, Kennedy acknowledges this though he believes the cost is worth it.
Chapter Four deals with the dreaded Race Card. Kennedy goes through each candidate's campaign in 2008, focusing on Hillary Clinton, McCain, and Obama's campaigns. His surprising conclusion is that there was very little race baiting - he gives a lot of credit to McCain, though many readers will dislike this - but that many commentators and pundits during the election cycle engaged in irresponsible racially charged accusations. I agree with Kennedy's statement that we all need to do a better job in giving people the benefit of the doubt.
The last four chapters each deal with these themes in different ways - evaluating the Jeremiah Wright controversy, discussing the Sotomayor nomination process, and discussing how Obama talks about race (i.e. doesn't talk about if he can help it).
Conservative frustration with race is that it often seems to be used as a weapon (i.e. the race card) rather than a genuine issue. Just a few weeks ago a headline writer was fired for writing the headline "A Chink in the Armor" when referring to the Asian NBA player Jeremy Lin. He had used this headline many times before and clearly did not intend to cause offense. In fact, his color-blindness seems to have worked against him - "chink" never even registered for him as a term that had anything to do with Asians. Yet he lost his job. The "Sherrod debacle" as Kennedy calls it (p 238) is a similar example, but of a black woman unfairly accused.
This kind of thing has to stop. It has been forty years since the majority of Americans embraced the civil rights movement, and those who participated in that movement were not aged 0. Serious racism last found in the mid twentieth century is rare in most parts of the country as Kennedy says in the book. In my elementary school twenty+ years ago the most popular kid in the school was black. Accusations about racism now deal with "unconscious racism" since there are few real examples of racism. At some point we need to stop tearing ourselves apart over racism. The real legacy of racism is that black households have not accumulated the wealth and assets that white families have often accumulated and that can be passed on in various ways (e.g. sending kids to college, having spare time to help with homework, etc.). Perhaps if irresponsible accusations of racism weren't so rampant we could actually work together to end this sad legacy. And perhaps this book can help further this goal.
----------------------
Note -- Few people have commented on the content of this book despite multiple reviews because race is a very touchy subject. As Kennedy says, we need to all just calm down and give each other the benefit of the doubt. Please be patient with me.
* = yes, I do here remove his title for brevity - as does Mr Kennedy in three out of eight chapter titles and repeatedly in the text. Here again, we see a heightened racial awareness in interpreting words as having depreciatory motives instead of more normal motives such as brevity. We often refer to "Bush" or "Clinton" without remark.