Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle Reading App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
Best Books of the Year So Far
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2015's Best Books of the Year So Far in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Frequently Bought Together
*Starred Review* Journalist Patterson proves Mark Twain’s point that “truth is stranger than fiction.” Patterson’s recounting of the events leading up to and including the global financial meltdown in 2007 and 2008 features the Quants, a new breed of investor, a corps of elite math geniuses who exchanged the hunches of risk-taking traders for advanced mathematical tools, including complicated algorithms and supercomputers. These new titans of Wall Street set off a chain of events for a financial catastrophe beginning in August 2007, which nearly destroyed the world’s financial markets. This is primarily the story of four main “characters”—Morgan Stanley’s Peter Muller, Citadel hedge fund’s Ken Griffin, Cliff Asness of AQR hedge fund, and Boaz Weinstein of Deutsche Bank. These and other number-crunching wizards amassed multibillion-dollar war chests and then the numbers turned against them. Their ascendancy to the heights and then extraordinary fall to near extinction is a remarkable story, as is the possibility that they all will rise from the ashes. This is a must-read, excellent book. --Mary Whaley
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Scott Patterson is author of the New York Times best-selling book The Quants and a staff reporter for The Wall Street Journal, where he writes about the government's regulation of the financial industry. His work has also appeared in the New York Times, Rolling Stone and Mother Earth News. He has a masters of arts degree from James Madison University. He lives in Alexandria, Virginia.
The subtitle begins, misleadingly, with the word, "how." There is no "how" in the book. It is a beach read, an adventure story full of noir language, but short on words such as nonlinear, leptokurtic, nonparametric, adaptive. I think he uses the term "standard deviation" once.
If Scott Patterson edited The Joy of Cooking, his recipe for chocolate cake would read as follows:
"Irma Rombauer shuffled nervously. A little flour, a few eggs, and - wham, bam - through the magic of French chef-ery, a cake would magically appear. It had always worked in the past. Surely it would again this time, wouldn't it? Rombauer stared pensively at the oven."
Entertaining, but hardly enlightening, and not useful.
Scott Patterson's _The Quants_ was thoroughly terrible. Patterson manages to make a dizzying array (to borrow a term he overuses) of errors, packaged in a mass of hyperbolae and confused statements.
It had a few good qualities, which I'll start with. It was pretty entertaining, especially the first half, and it was a quick and easy read. It also had some interesting bits that don't appear in other books (that I'm aware of): the "second forty hours" at Renaissance and the description of AQR deciding to go back into the markets on the Friday just after the quant liquidation in August 2007. Finally, I applaud the message that risk management policies based on the normal distribution can be deeply pernicious. But the problems with this book were monumental.
The first problem with Patterson's book is that it's wrong at its core. Quant traders weren't guilty of causing the credit crisis. Some of them were victimized by it (when Lehman went bust, it took with it a bunch of money belonging to some very good, honest, and hardworking quant traders that were Lehman's prime brokerage clients). It's foolish to claim that market neutral trading, CTAs, and high frequency traders were somehow responsible for investment banks' over-leveraged, toxic balance sheets. The responsibility for this falls squarely on the shoulders of banks' managers, and perhaps also on the shoulders of free-market disciples who believe, despite all the evidence throughout history to the contrary, that regulation of human behavior is bad.Read more ›
I heard an NPR interview pertaining to this book and immediately bought a copy. Many of the personalities woven into Patterson's tale are very intriguing, to say the least.
This book neatly retraces the influences of several quantitative traders ("quants", got it?). The author provides a history spanning the early work of Ed Thorp ("The Godfather") up to the current generation of quants who currently run the high-frequency trading strategies on Wall Street.
All in all, the book is a good read... but it also could have been assembled in a more informative way. The author set out a rather difficult task for himself: on the one hand, he has to tell the anecdotes in a way that will reach a wide audience; on the other hand, he has to provide a thorough enough treatment of topics that could easily be found in an advanced textbook. Patterson's approach goes right down the middle, so that sometimes it is condescendingly basic, while at other times unintelligibly riddled with market lingo. Hence most readers will not be able to read it at a consistent pace.
I suspect that the main frustration for most readers will be that extremely important bits are incompletely explained at the outset. For example, the distribution curve on page 30 has no axis labels... either you know what the author is talking about or you don't. Various terminology is not explained well at all; for example, the author's description of warrants will likely send you straight to wikipedia for clarification:
""Warrants are basically long term contracts, much like a call option, that investors can convert into common stock."
Basically? Call option? Common stock?! How about a more through lexicon at the back of the book for everyone who isn't a daytrader?!Read more ›
Disclosure: I work as a quant, primarily in risk management. This is not the only book I have examined, written by an author who clearly does not understand mathematics well enough to render a qualified opinion, to pin the blame on quantitative professionals in finance. I have seen the reality of it first hand for myself, time after time, where the sales and marketing people want to get out there and SELL SELL SELL financial products involving derivatives, and when times are good, they have big celebrations about how great we are, and how much we sold. However, they often have marketed these products by going over the heads of quant/risk professionals who were not given the opportunity to perform due diligence, or who have issued red flags over questionable assumptions. When the market turns down, however, the company has to scramble to cover their liabilities and losses. Don't say we didn't tell you so.