To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach Paperback – November 7, 2010
|New from||Used from|
Adam Hamilton Explores the Major Themes of The Gospel of John
Join Adam Hamilton this Lent and Easter, as he explains the context of some of the best-known verses in the New Testament while teaching abouth the life, ministry, death and resurrection of Jesus through the Gospel of John. Learn more | See author page
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
"All scholars who are interested in the historical evidence for Jesus' resurrection will profit from this book. . . . No other work matches its thoroughness, depth of research, or rigor in applying a clear and responsible historical method to the question of Jesus' resurrection." (Charles L. Quarles, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, December 2011)
". . . [R]eaders of this well-written, well-documented book will find that both the process used and the issues covered are fascinating." (D. Ingolfsland, Choice, June 2011)
"Licona develops a surprisingly fresh and rigorous historiographical approach analysing data and interpretations from the eighth century BC up to the third century AD." (Frederic Mulder, Evangelicals Now, May 2011)
"For any reader [Licona] will be a most thorough, thoughtful, and courteous companion on his book's long journey through it's important and contested terrain." (Rev. Robin Griffith-Jones, Church Times, April 28, 2011)
"Michael Licona's thorough study of beliefs in Jesus' resurrection is to be recommended, since it is informed of the social sciences, ancient data, . . . attends to the New Testament witnesses and engages most of the recent discussions. He rightly argues that the early Christians did not interpret Jesus' resurrection in a metaphorical or poetic sense to the exclusion of a literal event that had occurred to his corpse." (James H. Charlesworth, Princeton Theological Seminary)
"At first glance this book is very provocative even for a theologian who is convinced that the Easter faith is based on an authentic encounter with God. But at second glance I became aware that Michael Licona is not dealing with the 'resurrection faith' but more modestly with the 'resurrection hypothesis'--in other words, with those aspects of the resurrection faith that are accessible to historical arguments. It is fascinating to follow his arguments step by step in his investigation of the resurrection of Jesus as a unique event in history. I once learned that historiography is limited to events with analogies, immanent causality and sources that must be criticized. These are, according to Ernst Troeltsch, the great theologian and philosopher of historicism, the three principles of modern historical research. Must we revise these principles? Must we reformulate them? Perhaps! In any case, it is refreshing to be confronted with quite another approach that evaluates carefully the historical data, discusses respectfully the arguments of opponents and demonstrates a humility concerning the results, claiming only historical degrees of plausibility for its own hypothesis. Many arguments are valuable also for readers who do not agree. It is a necessary book, and I recommend it to all who are interested in a responsible way to interpret the Bible and the Christian faith." (Gerd Theissen, University of Heidelberg)
"With impressive erudition, Licona marshals all possible evidence of Jesus' resurrection and considers its significance in a careful, methodical way. He then compares several alternative explanations of the disciples' faith in the resurrection, judging them according to important criteria, and concludes that Jesus' bodily resurrection provides the best explanation of their conviction, and so is worthy of belief. This is an astonishing achievement and a major contribution to the ongoing debate. It is clearly written and full of fresh insights and arguments that will enrich discussion for years to come." (C. Behan McCullagh, author of The Logic of History)
"Licona has tackled his subject energetically, with near-obsessive thoroughness. He concludes that if one approaches the sources without an a priori commitment to the impossibility of resurrection, the 'Resurrection Hypothesis' is the interpretation that most adequately accounts for the evidence. Thus, the book boldly challenges the naturalistic presuppositions of post-Enlightenment historical criticism. At the very least, Licona has shown that the usual naturalistic explanations of the resurrection tradition are, on the whole, weak, speculative and often tendentious. "I am not aware of any scholar who has previously offered such a thorough and fair-minded account of the historiographical prolegomena to the resurrection question. Furthermore, Licona's discussion of the 'bedrock' historical evidence is appropriately nuanced and carefully modulated, not claiming more than can be supported by the consensus findings of qualified scholars. This lends credibility to his conclusions. Licona has presented a fair and vigorous case for his position. No doubt many readers will be unconvinced by his arguments, but no one can accuse him of naiveté or of ignoring counterarguments. "This study spans fields that are too rarely brought into conversation: New Testament studies and historiographical theory. Licona is to be commended for this undertaking and for producing a study that has both wide range and significant depth." (Richard B. Hays, George Washington Ivey Professor of New Testament and dean, Duke Divinity School)
"No episode in the life of anyone in history is more important than the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. Vehemently denied or vigorously defended, it has intrigued the world for twenty centuries. A host of scholars have addressed the phenomenon, so what more could be said? In The Resurrection of Jesus, Michael Licona tells us indeed. In brilliant detail, he begins with the anomaly that I, as an ancient historian, have noted for years: that secular historians often have a much higher regard for the New Testament as source material than do many theologians and scholars of religion. The latter tend to overlay their research with preconceived and hopelessly subjective opinions, often ignoring the basic rules of historiography. Licona corrects all this in showing how the research and writing of history ought to be done objectively, especially in dealing with Jesus. I warmly commend this book to all who want to know if the resurrection of Jesus really happened." (Paul L. Maier, Russell H. Seibert Professor of Ancient History, Western Michigan University)
"The most important event in the story of Christian beginnings is the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, who was widely believed by his followers to be the Messiah of Israel and the very Son of God. Their conviction that Jesus was such a being was confirmed by the resurrection. Without the resurrection of Jesus there really are no grounds for Christian faith. Consequently, there is no topic more important than this one and this is why Michael Licona's book on the resurrection of Jesus is so welcome. Licona demonstrates expertise in every field that is germane to the question. He knows the philosophical arguments inside and out, as well as the relevant historical, biblical, cultural and archaeological data. This is the book for believers and skeptics alike." (Craig A. Evans, Payzant Distinguished Professor of New Testament, Acadia Divinity College, Nova Scotia, Canada)
"Treatments of the resurrection from various angles have become fairly common in recent years, though careful assessments are rare. But efforts that place the resurrection of Jesus against the meticulous backdrop of historiographical principles are perhaps the rarest of all. The brilliance of Mike Licona's approach is his attempt to look far beyond his own discipline of New Testament studies in an effort to develop a rigorous method by which he could analyze and evaluate a historical claim such as the resurrection. His approach is original, and accompanied by painstaking honesty regarding the prospects of arriving at the best answer on this matter. Those who take the time to work through the various conclusions will, in my opinion, be rewarded by a cautious, thorough and painstaking study that could scarcely be outdone. I can vouch for the extent of Mike's gut-wrenching level of soul-searching before and during this time of study, and can attest that it was a real effort to come to grips with a final conclusion, wherever that might lead. There is no question that the reader is the one who will benefit from this process. This is simply required reading for anyone who wants to master this subject." (Gary R. Habermas, Distinguished Research Professor, Liberty University and Theological Seminary)
"What Licona calls a new historiographical approach is nothing of the sort. Rather, it is an old, time-honored approach still found among the great majority of historians. What is new is the application of genuine, rigorous historical investigation--methods and theories as defined by professional historians, not biblical scholars--to the question of whether Jesus was raised from the dead. He leaves no stone unturned in his examination of the evidence, and engages those with different views fairly yet with a tour de force that unmasks their lack of explanatory adequacy concerning the resurrection. "The book is clear and logical, written in an irenic, respectful tone, yet with passion, self-criticism and an engaging style. In short, Licona models what a true historian should do as he investigates the evidence for Jesus' resurrection. He has succeeded in making a compelling case with which all biblical scholars, as well as any who are concerned with whether Jesus was raised from the dead, must wrestle. When it comes to the resurrection of Jesus, the metanarrative of our lives hangs in the balance. But that metanarrative goes beyond what Licona has presented. An unbiased reader (if there were such a thing!) will have to work out the implications for him- or herself." (Daniel B. Wallace, executive director, Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, and professor of New Testament studies, Dallas Theological Seminary)
"This rich volume is not only a storehouse of valuable information pertinent to the historical credibility of the resurrection of Jesus, but also an important contribution to the discussion of the historiographical problems raised by the investigation of so singular an event. Licona rejects the pessimism that characterizes many historical Jesus scholars with respect to a resolution of these problems. He explodes the myth of a postmodern historiography while recognizing the ineluctability of personal horizons. As a friend of Mike Licona, I know how mightily and honestly he wrestled with the issue of his own horizons in tackling the question of Jesus' resurrection. The result is as objective an assessment of the evidence as one might reasonably demand." (William Lane Craig, author of Is God Real? and contributing editor, God Is Great, God Is Good)
"This book is the most thorough treatment on the resurrection and historiography to date, useful also to those studying the intersections of philosophy of science, history and theology. Drawing masterfully from a wide range of disciplines, Licona builds a coherent case showing that the best explanation for our evidence involves Jesus' historical resurrection. Licona's research also makes clear that the frequent skepticism about this claim in much of the academy reflects not serious historiographic consideration but the mere inheritance of outdated philosophic assumptions." (Craig S. Keener, professor of New Testament, Palmer Theological Seminary)
"The resurrection of Jesus is--in many ways--too important a topic to be left to theologians! In this thoroughly researched and well-argued volume, Mike Licona brings the latest in discussion of historiography to bear on the question of Jesus' resurrection. In a discipline that is often overwhelmed by theological special-pleading, it is refreshing to have this sober and sensible approach to the resurrection that evaluates the historical data and the arguments of many of the scholars writing on the subject. There are few biblical scholars who will not learn something from this important book." (Stanley E. Porter, president, dean and professor of New Testament, McMaster Divinity College)
About the Author
More About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
Because of this widespread lack of methodological expertise on the issue, Licona asks a simple question which the rest of the book sets out to answer: "If professional historians who work outside of the community of biblical scholars were to embark on an investigation of the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus, what would such an investigation look like?" (p19). In case you think he leaves it there, he launches a well-reasoned and heavily footnoted attack in the following 699 pages.
For anyone familiar with resurrection debates, it's a fun topic. Of course, for Christians, it's much more than that. In sharing the gospel with unbelievers, objections to the resurrection pose a stumbling block to the core of our message. When we hear the common criticism "there's not enough evidence," Licona's readers can now reply that modern rules of evidence are not how scholars justify events of ancient history.Read more ›
What surprised me most about this book is the very conservative stand Licona took on irrefutable facts. By conservative, I don't mean politically conservative or religiously conservative, but rather extremely reserved in what he used as the basis of his argument.
Licona accepts only three inarguable points:
1. Jesus Christ was crucified and died.
2. The apostles claimed to have seen Jesus bodily alive after his death and were changed.
3. Paul of Tarsus claimed to have seen Jesus bodily alive after his death and was radically changed.
I was a bit disappointed that there was only minimal discussion of the empty tomb. Licona does not rely heavily on the gospels but rather on 1 Cor. 15:3-5 as the earliest account of Christ's fate. That passage is oral tradition, he says, passed directly from the eyewitness apostles to Paul and predates the gospels by a decade or two. Unbelievers may argue that, but it certainly tends to deflate the "gospels aren't reliable sources" argument.
Licona takes on various "resurrection hypotheses" promoted by other Bible scholars and he does a devastating job of dismantling each one. Some are patently absurd and have no basis in either fact or history. It doesn't take much to torpedo them. Others are reasonable but he points out their serious flaws.
I'm no Bible scholar, but I do know Scripture fairly well and I have a basic understanding of Christian theology.Read more ›
Gary Habermas has for years been the name in evangelical Christianity on defending the Resurrection. His prize student in this field has been Mike Licona. Together, they wrote The Case For The Resurrection of Jesus. I happen to know Mike Licona very well and I know that whatever he does, he does seriously. I also know that he is one who has dealt with doubt on many topics so he wants to make sure he's right. What would it be like then if he alone wrote a book to demonstrate how he went about verifying the Resurrection of Jesus?
I no longer have to wonder that. He has released such a book and it is a gold mine of information. Licona has changed the face of studies in the Resurrection of Jesus with this book. From now on, any scholar who wishes to say that Jesus did not rise from the dead, will have to address the content and the methodology that is put forward in this book.
I say content and methodology because Licona deals with both of them. The first third of the book nearly is spend on methodology alone. What is history? What does it mean to do history? How does one do history? This is not just in fields of religious studies but information that could apply to any area of study.
I find this part incredibly important due to people not knowing how to do history. It's not just looking at the data and saying, "Well that sounds true." It involves looking at a list of criteria and knowing the best way to evaluate the content of your sources and knowing which sources are ones that are worth using.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
The deepest and most intricate defense of the resurrection. Mike looks at all the facts without bias to test his faith and he was amazed at how amazing the evidence really is for... Read morePublished 28 days ago by Grant M.
Discussion surrounding the resurrection of Jesus has traditionally hosted a long list of scholarly voices. Read morePublished 2 months ago by John M. Kight
Well written with great detail. Licona takes nothing for granted and will dive deep into reasons for and against almost every point he makes from the sources to... Read more
Despite the benefits of the book in making a major reassessment of the historiographical issues involved with the resurrection of Jesus, the book suffers a fatal defect: For all... Read morePublished 6 months ago by skepticdude
The bodily resurrection of Jesus is a foundational tenet of the Christian faith. As such, it’s frequently addressed in apologetics books. Read morePublished 7 months ago by Jennifer Guo
I think his quote on page 132 really sums up the objectivity with which Licona is trying to present the case: "I am convinced that my interest in truth supersedes my fear of... Read morePublished 9 months ago by Trent Horton
this book tries to make a strictly historical approach to investigation of the question of the resurrection of Jesus.
this book fails. Read more
When I received this book it was much thicker than I expected and written in the form of a proper academic thesis. Read morePublished 11 months ago by Willem Schoeman
Licona's theology is comparatively unique, but it IS supernatural theology, not anything that is factually correct. Read morePublished 11 months ago by james warren