29 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A fascinating, multi-faceted analysis of the vampire, February 11, 2004
I think the title of this book does it more harm than good, creating expectations that don't quite pan out in the text and thereby donning it with a ready-made target for criticism. It's really hard to describe The Science of Vampires because the author covers so much material and does it in the most fascinating of ways. I found this book nothing short of riveting and continuously eye-opening. I've been reading about vampires for a long time, but Ramsland made me feel like a vampire layman quite uninitiated in the secrets truths and mystical airs of the subject at hand. She advanced notions that had never occurred to me, bringing to bear the tools of physical, abstract, and social science in her study.
Nowhere does the author claim that vampires are "real," it is important to note. She is not out to prove vampire existence; instead, she sets out to study the vampire mythos in a scientific manner. When she discusses the "birth" of the vampire in folklore, she addresses such physical things as the decomposition of the human body to explain how perfectly natural occurrences such as a body shifting in the grave, bloating, or maintaining a rare redness of pallor might explain events our ancestors ascribed to evil manifestations. She takes vampire characteristics such as fangs, a compulsion to drink blood, an inability to tolerate sunlight, etc., and postulates as to what conditions and behaviors might provide an actual, scientific explanation for such unusual manifestations in an individual. She even delves rather deeply into matters of DNA and genetic mutation in discussing the possibility of retarding cellular death in order to prolong life. I was mesmerized by the conjectures she offered up for thought. She takes a substantive look at vampire-like criminals such as Peter Kurten (the Monster of Dusseldorf), Countess Erzebet Bathory, as well as serial killers such as Jeffrey Dahmer, and she even goes so far as to describe what the crime scene of an actual vampire killing might look like. She goes deeply into psychology and forensics, offering a profile of a hypothetical vampire killer and pointing to serological analyses, odontological studies of teeth marks, and other modern marvels of forensic science that would put the vampire of today in a much more legally vulnerable spot than his blood-sucking predecessors of old. Later, she attempts to answer all the questions you have about vampire sex and are afraid to ask, addressing the undeniably powerful eroticism that in many ways defines vampirism.
Ramsland's most instructive contributions are also her most esoteric ones. The author spends a significant amount of time speaking to the continual evolution and seemingly permanent appeal of the vampire. Her approach reveals more about man than vampire in the end, but that is because the vampire not only represents something deep and meaningful in the human imagination, he reflects and anticipates constantly shifting cultural values in society. Ramsland demonstrates this most forcibly in her analysis of the evolution of the vampire persona in literature over the years; the appeal of Dracula remains strong, but the vampires of the late 20th century are a far cry from Stoker's imaginings; what was once evil has been turned into all manner of romantic, sympathetic, and sexually twisted individuals. She employs the methods of deconstruction to examine vampires in a postmodern light, linking such analysis to the radical scientific shift from Newtonian thought to quantum theory. Ramsland's ability to address the essence of vampirism from so many complex levels is impressive, to say the least.
The Science of Vampires is one of the most insightful, eye-opening, horizon-expanding examinations of the vampire I have ever read. Although the author uses a plethora of analytical tools from a wide assortment of disciplines, the text remains fascinating and lucid throughout. The Science of Vampires answers questions I would never have thought to ask, and I recommend it quite highly to anyone with a passionate interest in that most powerful and alluring monster of man's collective imagination, the vampire.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Average book with a misleading title., June 14, 2004
This was an interesting book that makes an insightful examination of the legend of vampires. Although it's title suggests its main purpose is to explore scientific reasons for the various characteristics attributed to vampires, it mostly focuses on the development of the mythos; a cursory examination of Eastern European folklore is followed by a breif discussion of how a vampire might be possible, then the book continues with a history of vampires in literature and the evolution of the concept in its various media. Although blood-drinking, sun-avoiding, undead vampires are fiction, it would've been fun had the author spent more time exploring all the ways they might work if they were real. To anyone who was looking for something along those lines I recommend Charnas' The Vampire Tapestry and Matheson's I Am Legend. Both novels treat their mythological subjects with respect and go to some lengths to make them seem plausable. Overall, The Science of Vampires was enjoyable but I wish the content had followed the title a bit more.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A Wannabe Lestat?, September 9, 2005
The problem with this book is that in trying to provide a scientific plausibility for the existence of vampires, it sticks too closely to Anne Rice's model: It almost comes across as a propaganda piece for her Chronicles (she has also authored several other books relating to Rice's works).
Ramsland only seems concerned with the Anne Rice literary model of vampire, turning it into something almost like a comic book superhero more suited to the "X-Men" than any kind of creature with the supernatural trappings that make vampires interesting in the first place.
A fairly useless book for vampirological research and one for the Vampire Chronicles completist only.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
