The Shock of the Old and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Qty:1
  • List Price: $26.00
  • Save: $5.59 (22%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: Hard cover book is in near perfect condition. Dust cover is intact, with no nicks or tears. Spine has no signs of creasing. Pages are clean and are not marred by notes or folds of any kind. There is a signature or handwriting on the inside front and/or back cover. 100% satisfaction quaranteed.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900 Hardcover – December 15, 2006

ISBN-13: 978-0195322835 ISBN-10: 0195322835

Buy New
Price: $20.41
23 New from $4.45 72 Used from $0.01 2 Collectible from $18.95
Amazon Price New from Used from
eTextbook
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$20.41
$4.45 $0.01

Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student



Frequently Bought Together

The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900 + Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Price for both: $40.90

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Save up to 90% on Textbooks
Rent textbooks, buy textbooks, or get up to 80% back when you sell us your books. Shop Now

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press (December 15, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0195322835
  • ISBN-13: 978-0195322835
  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 6.4 x 9.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (12 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #966,376 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

A class titled History of Modern Technology 101 would probably focus on electricity, mass production, the automobile and the Internet, but according to British historian Edgerton, it would miss the real history of 20th-century technology. We should pay less attention to novelty and invention, he argues, and more to the technologies that people actually use in their daily lives—"a whole invisible world of technologies," many of which have served the poor more than the rich, such as corrugated metal and flat-pack IKEA furniture. Ranging across broad swaths of history, Edgerton offers multiple examples of overlooked technologies that are far more important than they might initially seem, including the condom and the sewing machine, as well as innovations in killing, such as insecticides, slaughterhouses and chemical warfare. The result, while sometimes overly pedantic for nonhistorians, is a provocative challenge to students of technology. (Jan.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Booklist

Despite too many opaque sentences, this book is utterly fascinating. The common view of technology as a matter of novelty, of invention and innovation accelerating into the future, is very limited, Edgerton says. To understand technology historically, consider technology in use, and some remarkable facts emerge. Highly touted new technologies, such as the Pill and atomic power, were derailed by unforeseen (AIDS) or unconsidered (nuclear waste disposal) developments and sidelined by the technologies they had supposedly made obsolescent. The huge twentieth-century surge in productivity depended on improving old technologies, and we see the effect in such places as China of the quick succession of technological revolutions that occurred over more time in the U.S. Maintenance consumes a much larger proportion of technological effort than innovation, nations a-building characteristically attempt to control certain technologies for nationalistic purposes, and war and killing are the wellsprings of the most consequential modern inventions. In short, the old ways--power by harness animals, nationalism, warfare, slaughtering for food--don't fade away. They adapt, and that is the real big story about technology. Ray Olson
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

And how was the Japanese leadership to know that the U.S. did not actually have hundreds of atomic bombs?
P. Chrzanowski
In some cases they may not care and are more interested in convincing the reader of their view than of providing factual information.
Caticia
SHOCK OF THE OLD is a top pick for college-level history holdings, but many a public library will find it is easy to digest, also.
Midwest Book Review

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
Every day each one of us is bombarded by commercial messages touting the latest and greatest products. You can now purchase a self-cleaning hot tub or a cell phone that can store and play thousands of songs. But just how much useful innovation is really taking place in the opening decade of the 21st Century? In "The Shock of The Old" author David Edgerton offers the somewhat controversial proposition that in spite of all of the hype what is happening today really is not all that innovative after all. Rather, Edgerton argues "judging from the present, the past looks extraordinarily innovative." The interesting arguments made by Edgerton are certainly worth exploring.

Whether discussing innovations in military technology, transportation, pharmaceuticals or consumer products, David Edgerton wants to find out not only how useful these technologies really are but also how much they are actually used. Although Edgertons writing style proves to be less than scintillating, his idea is certainly a fascinating one. For example, Edgerton argues rather effectively that rockets and the atomic bomb are two of the most overrated technologies in military history. The fact of the matter is that much older technologies such as airplanes, the rifle and heavy artillery remain to this day the most prolific tools of war. Indeed, Edgerton even goes so far as to suggest that had the United States directed more of its resources to traditional weapons like these instead of the atomic bomb then World War II might have actually been concluded much sooner. And while the German V-2 rocket was capable of delivering a one ton warhead to a target some 200 miles away it was certainly not very cost effective.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Keith Otis Edwards on January 4, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
The history we are taught in school, held to be common knowledge, is almost always wrong, and nowhere is this more true than with the history of technology. Growing up in the United States, I was taught that everything was invented in America: that Howe invented the sewing machine, Fulton the steamboat, Morse the telegraph, and Edison invented the incandescent light bulb everything else. Of course, none of that is true, and my favorite books are everything-you-know-is-wrong books which correct our assumptions of how modern life came to be. "The Shock of the Old" is one of the best of these, and it is full of examples of how inventions developed in unexpected places. For example, he points out that in 1895, there were more automobiles running on the streets of Barcelona than there were in New York (or Detroit).

But is it all accurate? For the most part, detailed source notes are provided, but then Edgerton makes such statements as that prior to 1939 only Great Britain and Germany had broadcast television. I suppose that by 1939, he refers to the public demonstration of television at the New York World's Fair, but prior to that Britain's broadcast television was from the Baird Television company, which employed the *mechanical* capture and reproduction of a moving image using a spinning disk system invented in 1883 by German engineer Paul Nipkow.

This is the second book I've read (the other being The Industrial Revolutionaries: The Making of the Modern World 1776-1914) that was written by a Brit whose intent seems to be to counteract the collective egotism of Americans by minimizing (or ignoring) American innovations.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Dave Kuhlman on April 10, 2013
I've mixed feelings about this book. In many cases I'm a fan of and am excited by the
latest new-new thing. But, other new-new things seem like a waste of money and time;
they're mere amusements or worse. For example, it's 2013 and I *still* don't text or
tweet.

But, perhaps that's Edgerton's message: that we should choose our new technologies
selectively and carefully. Some are worth developing and using. Some are a waste of
time, money, energy, and other resources. Some are worse than that.

Another valuable message from this book is that we should all be skeptical (and maybe
cynical, too) about new-new technologies that are promoted by those with a financial (or
other) interest.

One of Edgerton's worries is that technological boosterism and promotion by interested
parties determines the future (or history as the case may be). In contrast, I'm sure that
*most* of us would prefer to have technologies that work the best and that give us the
most power at the least cost become the ones that are available.

Edgerton has several approaches to evaluating new technologies and what were once new
technologies. One is to focus on the amount of use, rather than inventiveness, cuteness,
and, especially, promotion. Another is to look at usefulness and how effective a
technology is at what it is intended to do. And, still another is to look at macro
effects, macro economic benefit in particular, asking whether adopting a new technology
actually improves the wealth and GDP of a nation that adopts it.

Some technologies are major and primary. Some technologies are important because they
support or are necessary for and enable other technologies.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search