The Silver Age of Comic Book Art [Hardcover]

Arlen Schumer (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: October 2003

The Silver Age (1956-1970) was one of the most popular and influential eras in comic book history for creators and readers alike. THE SILVER AGE OF COMIC BOOK ART highlights the careers of eight acknowledged hall of fame artists who drew definitive versions of the industry's greatest characters, while often setting trends in the look of comic book art itself. Arlen Schumer's book is the first to concentrate on the importance of these artists and their work, as well as the literary and sociological aspects of the Silver Age. Designed by the author using a distinctive graphic style, actual comic book art is enlarged to dynamic full- and double-page spreads, along with biographical text by the author, and thoughts, ideas and quotes from the artists themselves. Finally, here is an art book that pays proper homage to this great era of comic books and the amazing artists responsible for it.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Schumer constructed the book to look like the world's biggest, most lavish comic book of all...the results are revelatory." -- The New York Times, December 14, 2003

"This is the perfect gift for the older superhero lover in the family." -- The Washington Times, December 20, 2003

(Arlen Schumer is) "one of the more articulate and enthusiastic advocates of comic book art in America." -- Comic Book Artist Magazine, 1998

About the Author

Arlen Schumer is one of the foremost historians of comic book art. His articles have appeared in Print Magazine, Comic Book Marketplace, and Comic Book Artist. He has given multimedia presentations for the New York Art Directors Club and designed exhibits for the Words and Pictures Museum in Northampton, Massachusetts. As a co-founder and partner of The Dynamic Duo studio, Schumer is one of comic book art's most idiosyncratic practitioners. He lives in Connecticut.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 192 pages
• Publisher: Collectors Press; 1St Edition edition (October 2003)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1888054867
• ISBN-13: 978-1888054866
• Product Dimensions: 13.3 x 9.3 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 3.1 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (28 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,999,060 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

12 of 13 people found the following review helpful

3.0 out of 5 stars Softcover buyer beware January 15, 2004

By marilyn j welch

Format:Paperback

Take heed. The softcover omits 16 or so pages from the hardcover, so you don't get the mini-features on Wallace Wood, Curt Swan, Nick Cardy, Murphy Anderson, and John Buscema which I really wanted to see. I think it's a really cheap move on Collectors Press' part. Why couldn't they have included those 16 extra pages? If they are trying to entice people to buy the hardcover, why bother making a softcover edition at all? Otherwise, a beautiful book.

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful

3.0 out of 5 stars Design engaging, Info lite October 28, 2006

By Reader from the North

Format:Hardcover

Some of the reviews praise this compliation, and others attack it. If you know what this book is, it can be very interesting and a spur to seek out more information on Silver Age artists.

First of all, what this book is: a visually interesting collage of artists from the 60s. Each page is designed differently and, with my untrained eye, I'd say visually engaging. Along the way you're given samples of the most famous covers and images that the various artists produced. He does reproduce (and enlarge) the original art which I liked (if I want enhanced art I'll check out the Marvel Masterpieces or DC Archives).

What this book is not: an indepth look at the artists or their influence on other artists. There are a number of intriguing quotations from the various artists--excellent sound bites--but not enough to let us know what made/makes them tick. Also a few figures (i.e. Doc Strange), when "blown up" became large pixels that--yes, visually interesting--but not as interesting as they would've been a bit smaller with more space for another graphic. What irritated me the most about the book was (in the interest of "design"??) some text was unreadable (see the bibliography for the worst example), and some art was unviewable (see Kirby's "self-portrait" that is totally obliterated by gray background and text.) Was the publisher so hard up on pages that we couldn't have a page of text as well as the Kirby (and Colon) self-portraits?

Overall, if you know what you're getting with the book, it's a nice addition to other 60s comic collections. I wouldn't pay for it in hardcover: it's too expensive for what you get--personally, I found it at an outlet bookstore at a fraction of the cost and felt it was a good buy.

38 of 50 people found the following review helpful

1.0 out of 5 stars No, this one's not good January 14, 2004

By n0s4a2

Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase

After reading the gushing reviews here, I bought this book sight unseen (a personal rule I resolve never to break again, as returning these books to Amazon is a royal hassle). The beauty of the so-called "Silver Age" of comics (mainly, the 1960s) is the elegance and harmony of the art and story. This book is another one of that endless invasion of in-your-face, sliced-and-diced compilation pieces that seek to razzle-dazzle the viewer who doesn't think. Everything is piecemeal, with montages overlapping other montages, fragments of recognizable works blown up to Roy Lichtenstein proportions and overlaid with small, cluttered, unrelated tidbits. It reduces the work to Pop Art, like printing comic book panels as wall paper, or on kid's bedsheets, for a "campy" effect. I expected an insightful presentation of what made that decade's comics so meaningful; something coherent, at least. This book is for people with no attention span (maybe people addicted to video games), who don't even try to understand a story or appreciate a composition, they just want frenzied details flying everywhere so you can't sort it out, like a kaleidoscopic segment of "Entertainment Tonight" compiled by a "hot" editor. I especially hate magnified images that go off the page with no border, trying to give a "hip" look to the layout. The value of Marvel comics, especially, was their accessibility, their clarity, their visual solidity. The comics industry went into a tailspin in the '80s when it was overrun by immature artists who tried to confuse the viewer by losing the center of interest and get by on pyrotechnics. The text, consisting of a snippet of catty gossip about Stan Lee here, a fragment of anonymous, truncated, corny dialog there, is sprinkled throughout with unrelated "factoids" no more than two or three sentences long, often in the gimmicky type you see in "trendy" magazines about pop music. It has nothing to say except how smirky and post-modern it is to chop up pieces of the past in a pop-culture blender and splash out a meaningless jumble of images for people to idly glance at, without context or narrative direction. For the distracted amusement of superficial illiterates only, not for knowledgeable people who like the beauty of an image that hasn't been tampered with, or seek a legitimate history of those creative years.