23 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing southern western featuring a union sympathist and a rebel spy engaging in bedroom antics on the trail, September 20, 2006
I wanted to like this book. It had a nice cover (albeit very modern in feel) and it was a Western. You know how they say authors should start with the action? I believe that wholeheartedly. The book should start with the action. It shouldn't pretend to start with the action with a two page teaser which then plunges into several hundred pages of backstory. It was Chapter 5 before we were back where we started in the opening two pages. And those first four chapters were such snoozers that I can barely remember why I continued reading the book.
What did I learn in the backstory? That Morgan and Jessamyn were promised to each other. That Morgan betrayed Jessamyn's trust early on. That Jessamyn married someone else and had good sex with him but not great sex because really good sex ONLY comes with the hero. That Morgan got a taste for bondage on night with Jessamyn when she held him hostage. Ha ha ha ha. I am sorry, but that just seems ridiculous. I mean, maybe it is completely true but I felt it was used solely for the purpose of creating a plausible reason for Morgan to have perverse sex tastes.
It's perfectly fine for characters to have different sexual tastes. There doesn't need to be a reason for it. Saying that its because of x, y or z reason seems ridiculous to me. There's never any explanation for why characters like oral sex (i.e., their mother made them suck on their thumb for 3 days straight). Or why characters like to have sex in the shower (i.e., first time they jacked off was in water). But whatever, that was the least of the problems in the book.
The plot was part search for gold and part dairy farming. Why do I say that? Because the heroine creamed so many times she should have been a cow. Was there no other word the author could have used? According to word search on my ebook reader, she used "cream" 18 times.
The villian was a cartoon. Let's not spend time creating a multi dimensional villian. Let's just think of all the evil, disgusting characteristics that a person could have and give that to the villian. (Spittle, impotence, cruelty, deviance, bad table manners). There's a ton, A TON, of telling in this book. Just because a character tells us something in dialogue, doesn't make it showing. That's still telling. Showing is having the character act in accordance with the traits the author is trying to imbue. I.e., if the author tells me the characters are being clever, show me that they are clever. Don't have them have this exchange which is completely devoid of cleverness:
Her husband pursed his lips (I think men should never purse their lips unless they are Carson Kressley), considering his general manager. "You can repay me at cost." He put his hand over his wife's.
"Cost plus-"
"Cost" william said flatly.
Morgan laughed. "Deal. I should have known better than to try to outwit you."
The hell? Not negotiating is "outwitting"?
There is so much sex in this book that there isn't much time for plot advancement or character development. In between the search for gold, we are treated to some stunningly awful sex scenes in which Morgan asserts his dominance over Jessamyn to pay her back for a) tying him to the bed so many years ago and b) for marrying his cousin and c) for actually having eyes that might accidently land on a man other than himself. The trouble with these books with all their sex scenes is that romance seems to be lost. Do Morgan and Jessamyn really love each other or do they just like a roll in the hay/dirt? I am guessing the latter.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Beter than average for the genre and considerably better than the first two books, November 23, 2006
This is kind of an odd book it is reminiscent of Louis L'Amour's Civil War and post westerns with some perils of Pauline thrown in but then you get to the bondage, Ds and erotic scenes which are well done.
The plot starts off very slow but finally gets started when Jessamine (Northern Sympathizer) figures out how to prevent Morgan (Southern Spy) from getting out with the information without turning him in and involving her terminally ill father, ingenious and sort of funny.
Inspire of a slow start and uneven plot the characters are compelling, the villains are good and the plot at least somewhat original.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3.0 out of 5 stars
Not Her Best Work, June 29, 2010
This review is from: The Southern Devil (Kindle Edition)
I liked Irish Devil and River Devil better than this one. The plot in Southern Devil was odd. They've been pledged to eachother as children then he comes to her home during the war and she ties him up because he's a spy and she's furious he endangered her ailing father, yet she engages in bedroom antics with him??? Later she marries his cousin, is widowed and runs into him again just when she must have a "husband" for the reading of an uncles will. After that it's a chase for gold, sex scenes and everything falls into place with a neat little bow which made it all a little unrealistic to me. Certain phrases were overused, like carnal, and the dialogue got downright ridiculous in places which detracted from what little plot we had going on. Of the 3 works I've read in this series I thought this was the weakest with the least developed story and characters.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
