Most studies of the Speaker of the House either examine one speaker at a time (in biography fashion, looking at Clay, Rayburn, O'Neill, Gingrich, etc.) or offer overly abstract theories of Speaker behavior. Rarely is the Speaker's legislative leadership examined with both historical sensitivity *and* theoretical rigor. Matthew N. Green's book does both with great success. In this sense, it is truly a breath of fresh air and a welcome contribution to the literature on Congress.
Green treats Speakers of the House as agents in the true sense of the word: they're not just automatons who are responsive to their party caucus (as leading theories would have us believe) -- they're purposive and strategic actors who seek to fulfill multiple goals simultaneously, who act creatively, and who influence policy outcomes. Their goals include their own reelection (to the speakership and to the House), the enactment of their preferred policies, and the fulfillment of various Speaker-related roles and duties. They can't always satisfy their multiple goals, but with voluminous research of primary and secondary materials, Green convincingly demonstrates that they consistently try. Showing this is, by itself, an important accomplishment. But the book also goes on to detail many other significant findings, including changes in leadership patterns over time (for example, floor advocacy by the Speaker has become more common over the years) and variation in the tactics employed and in the effects of leadership acts. Throughout, Green brings fascinating new evidence to bear.
To be sure, this book is first and foremost a work of scholarly political science -- it is a theoretically sophisticated and carefully developed study -- but it is also a well-written and easily accessible text that all political junkies will find interesting. It's a must-read for anyone interested in Congress, the behavior of the Speaker, and the dynamics of legislative leadership more generally.