From Library Journal
In this work, Dubofsky (history and sociology, SUNY at Binghamton) is trying to avoid many of the current paths of labor scholarship. Instead of investigating labor internally, he looks at the ways labor and capital have interacted with the various branches of government since Reconstruction. In studying the tangible labor policies of the state, he analyzes the influence of the different regions on one another, considering, for instance, the effect of congressional representatives from the South on New England's manufacturing workers. He also reveals that the use of troops against unions was often not court ordered but frequently decreed by the executive branch and supported by Congress. Dubofsky's footnotes and bibliography are, as usual, magnificent; when he ignores an event or aspect of a subject, the reader feels sure that he is aware of his actions. Recommended for all academic libraries.Clay Williams, Bluefield State Coll. Lib., W. Va.
Copyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Dubofsky's analysis is bracing and should generate much debate.
"Journal of American History"
This expert historical essay should be read by all political scientists.
"Political Science Quarterly"
An excellent book with many powerful and well-substantiated points.
"Industrial and Labor Relations Review"
An expert guide to the half-century of political and legal turmoil that preceded Taft-Hartley.
"American Historical Review"
"First-rate history, the best synthesis yet published of the public policy of labor relations in industrial America.
"Reviews in American History""
First-rate history, the best synthesis yet published of the public policy of labor relations in industrial America.
"Reviews in American History"