Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
THE THOMPSONS continues this trend. A sequel to THE HAMILTONS, writers/directors the Butcher Brothers have created another blood-soaked sexually perverse gorefest. It's unimaginative, derivative and only marginally enjoyable. It employs the standard jerky MTV camera work and uses moderately talented actors. Francis' cliché ridden narrative gets tedious and the movie's open-ended predictable climax screams sequel.
Don't get me wrong---I still enjoy vampire movies (I humbly admit I love TRUE BLOOD!) but I miss the Christopher Lee/Hammer days where we could root for the victims and not the vampires!
It has many of the same actors (Cory Knauf as Francis Hamilton / Thompson, Mackenzie Firgens as Mackenzie Firgens).
What doesn't make sense is the nature of their vampireness. In the first they were fangless blood-drinkers, in this they have fangs.
They also meet a more powerful family of vampires including Riley Stuart (Agent of SHIELD's Elizabeth Henstridge) who decides to betray her own family for love... a well worn plot device.
This English vampire family have some strange ideas regarding 'breeding' with other vampires that makes no sense.
Francis is a vampire-type person. He and his family are on the lam after going berserk in a desert diner, caught on film. The youngest brother Lenny (Ryan Hartwig) got shot in the chest. Exactly how this family who lived isolated, wanted by the law, dragging along a bloody kid with a shotgun wound to the chest, gets overseas (I don't think they had passports either) is a plot point not mentioned. They are seeking help, as their parents are dead and they don't know how to cope with this genetic vampire issue they lived with their whole life.
The family splits up and Francis goes to Ludlow looking for answers not realizing predators don't like their territory to be overcrowded with rival predators.
The film has its grindhouse moments, but then dies. As a "Twilight" type film, the writing was simply too bad. While I liked the basic plot outline, the details and execution lacked forethought and planning. It appears they slapped something together knowing the public will buy it depending on how they sell it, such as placing "Twilight" and Tarantino's name on the jacket. It is not that good. For what it's worth: Elizabeth Henstridge can act better than frequent Razzy nominee Kristen Stewart.
Parental guidance: F-bomb, sex, nudity (Katarina Gellin, Zoe Grisedale, Elizabeth Henstridge or body double) Three stars is a stretch.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
It was not your typical vampire movie, but I enjoyed it towards the last 30 minutes of the movie.Published 1 month ago by Kindle Customer
Hoping for better. A little bit too much gore for me; I prefer the romantic vampires, especially with powers. Read morePublished 5 months ago by Sunny Von Tepperoff
Low budget boring film with amateur actors. Low budget, like this was done on someone's allowance. The cover of this movie is way more professional than the movie itself. Read morePublished 5 months ago by Zalmorion the Fantastic
Well, I’ve heard it said “It’s not nice to speak ill of the dead” so I’ll let I lie. However, if you have a need for something vampirish, as I had when I chose this movie, look... Read morePublished 5 months ago by flicsea22
Not the best script or acting, except Elizabeth Henstrisge. But an overall ok movie.Published 7 months ago by stephanie weinfuss