The Threatening Storm and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

FREE Shipping on orders over $25.

Used - Very Good | See details
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading The Threatening Storm on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq [Hardcover]

Kenneth M. Pollack
3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (86 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition --  
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  
Image
Save on Popular Books This Summer
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more.

Book Description

September 18, 2002
In The Threatening Storm, Kenneth M. Pollack, one of the world’s leading experts on Iraq, provides a masterly insider’s perspective on the crucial issues facing the United States as it moves toward a new confrontation with Saddam Hussein.

For the past fifteen years, as an analyst on Iraq for the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Council, Kenneth Pollack has studied Saddam as closely as anyone else in the United States. In 1990, he was one of only three CIA analysts to predict the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. As the principal author of the CIA’s history of Iraqi military strategy and operations during the Gulf War, Pollack gained rare insight into the methods and workings of what he believes to be the most brutal regime since Stalinist Russia.

Examining all sides of the debate and bringing a keen eye to the military and geopolitical forces at work, Pollack ultimately comes to this controversial conclusion: through our own mistakes, the perfidy of others, and Saddam’s cunning, the United States is left with few good policy options regarding Iraq. Increasingly, the option that makes the most sense is for the United States to launch a full-scale invasion, eradicate Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction, and rebuild Iraq as a prosperous and stable society—for the good of the United States, the Iraqi people, and the entire region.

Pollack believed for many years that the United States could prevent Saddam from threatening the stability of the Persian Gulf and the world through containment—a combination of sanctions and limited military operations. Here, Pollack explains why containment is no longer effective, and why other policies intended to deter Saddam ultimately pose a greater risk than confronting him now, before he gains possession of nuclear weapons and returns to his stated goal of dominating the Gulf region. “It is often said that war should be employed only in the last resort,” Pollack writes. “I reluctantly believe that in the case of the threat from Iraq, we have come to the last resort.”

Offering a view of the region that has the authority and force of an intelligence report, Pollack outlines what the leaders of neighboring Arab countries are thinking, what is necessary to gain their support for an invasion, how a successful U.S. operation would be mounted, what the likely costs would be, and how Saddam might react. He examines the state of Iraq today—its economy, its armed forces, its political system, the status of its weapons of mass destruction as best we understand them, and the terrifying security apparatus that keeps Saddam in power. Pollack also analyzes the last twenty years of relations between the United States and Iraq to explain how the two countries reached the unhappy standoff that currently prevails.

Commanding in its insights and full of detailed information about how leaders on both sides will make their decisions, The Threatening Storm is an essential guide to understanding what may be the crucial foreign policy challenge of our time.


Editorial Reviews

Review

"One of the most important books on American foreign policy in years. There is no greater strategic challenge than Iraq, and nobody better qualified to tackle it than Kenneth Pollack. To have such comprehensive, high-quality professional analysis available publicly and in real time is simply extraordinary. From now on, all serious debate over how to handle Saddam starts here."
-Gideon Rose, Managing Editor, Foreign Affairs

"Iraq is at the top of America's foreign policy agenda and this book should be at the top of your reading list. Kenneth Pollack approaches the problem of Saddam Hussein without ideological blinkers or prejudices. He provides an clear-eyed account of the breakdown of American policy toward Saddam Hussein and makes a powerful case for a shift in that policy. Whether or not you agree with Pollack's solution -- and I do -- you will admire The Threatening Storm. It is intelligent, balanced, and measured; a model of fair-minded analysis on a topic that rarely gets any. Before you make up your mind on Iraq, read this book."
-Fareed Zakaria, editor of Newsweek International

" Kenneth Pollack has brilliantly written a comprehensive and insightful analysis of the problem Iraq poses for the United States. This is a must read for those desiring an in depth understanding of the issues in this complex problem and for those who are responsible for developing policy."
-General Anthony C. Zinni, USMC (Ret.)

From the Inside Flap

In The Threatening Storm, Kenneth M. Pollack, one of the world?s leading experts on Iraq, provides a masterly insider?s perspective on the crucial issues facing the United States as it moves toward a new confrontation with Saddam Hussein.

For the past fifteen years, as an analyst on Iraq for the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Council, Kenneth Pollack has studied Saddam as closely as anyone else in the United States. In 1990, he was one of only three CIA analysts to predict the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. As the principal author of the CIA?s history of Iraqi military strategy and operations during the Gulf War, Pollack gained rare insight into the methods and workings of what he believes to be the most brutal regime since Stalinist Russia.

Examining all sides of the debate and bringing a keen eye to the military and geopolitical forces at work, Pollack ultimately comes to this controversial conclusion: through our own mistakes, the perfidy of others, and Saddam?s cunning, the United States is left with few good policy options regarding Iraq. Increasingly, the option that makes the most sense is for the United States to launch a full-scale invasion, eradicate Saddam?s weapons of mass destruction, and rebuild Iraq as a prosperous and stable society?for the good of the United States, the Iraqi people, and the entire region.

Pollack believed for many years that the United States could prevent Saddam from threatening the stability of the Persian Gulf and the world through containment?a combination of sanctions and limited military operations. Here, Pollack explains why containment is no longer effective, and why other policies intended to deter Saddam ultimately pose a greater risk than confronting him now, before he gains possession of nuclear weapons and returns to his stated goal of dominating the Gulf region. ?It is often said that war should be employed only in the last resort,? Pollack writes. ?I reluctantly believe that in the case of the threat from Iraq, we have come to the last resort.?

Offering a view of the region that has the authority and force of an intelligence report, Pollack outlines what the leaders of neighboring Arab countries are thinking, what is necessary to gain their support for an invasion, how a successful U.S. operation would be mounted, what the likely costs would be, and how Saddam might react. He examines the state of Iraq today?its economy, its armed forces, its political system, the status of its weapons of mass destruction as best we understand them, and the terrifying security apparatus that keeps Saddam in power. Pollack also analyzes the last twenty years of relations between the United States and Iraq to explain how the two countries reached the unhappy standoff that currently prevails.

Commanding in its insights and full of detailed information about how leaders on both sides will make their decisions, The Threatening Storm is an essential guide to understanding what may be the crucial foreign policy challenge of our time.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 528 pages
  • Publisher: Random House; 1 edition (September 18, 2002)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0375509283
  • ISBN-13: 978-0375509285
  • Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.5 x 1.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (86 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,123,606 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
38 of 45 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Another Perspective October 25, 2002
Format:Hardcover
If the current administration expects to galvanize Americans to support a full-scale military invasion of Iraq, this book will prove indispensable to that effort. As a liberal democrat, I had no intention of reading this book because I assumed (erroneously) that it was no more than an insidious cocktail of Bush hagiography, right-wing invective, and knee-jerk patriotism. I was completely wrong. This book is simply remarkable. My opinion of George W. Bush is still what it was (very low), but Pollack has shown me that even a broken watch is right twice a day. Unfortunately, people tend to gravitate toward material which supports previously held opinions. I fear that Pollack's book will be championed by those already in lock-step with other administration sycophants (i.e., Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Peggy Noonan). This book is too good for that sad fate and it would be a colossal mistake to relegate its readership to the choir.
Was this review helpful to you?
21 of 24 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars I protested against the war in 1991 January 15, 2003
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
In January of 1991, I marched around the White House with thousands of others, protesting the war with Iraq. Not a pacifist by any stretch, I felt the recommendations of Colin Powell to try sactions and containment had not been given a chance. Keeping troops to defend Saudi Arabia was fine with me; it just seemed that a focused multilateral effort to pressure Saddam would have resulted in the liberation of Kuwait without a war.

I was wrong. As Kenneth Pollack clearly shows, containment would have never worked. As a policy to prevent Saddam from developing WMD, containment (coupled with inspections) has been a complete failure, due in part to various nations (i.e. France, Russia, China) circumventing the policy to serve their own economic self-interests. Pollack demostrates the implosion of containment in explicit detail. Those who proclaim that a U.S decision to go it alone and invade Iraq represents a defeat for multilateralism should wake up and smell the coffee; multilaterism died with the failure of containment.

With containment off the table, Pollack leaves us with two choices: deterrence or invasion. Pollack claims a policy of deterrence will result in an Iraq with nuclear weapons and the ability to blackmail the world by threatening to nuke the oil fields of the Persian Gulf. That leaves us with invasion. But what if a threat to Saudi oil didn't threaten our economic interests? If the West and Japan pursued policies that drastically reduced our dependence on oil, deterrence might be an option. Pollack doesn't address this possibility at all. It is the one failing in an otherwise excellent book. Before reading it, I was on the fence. Not anymore.

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
38 of 46 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Essential Reading for the Public Debate October 27, 2002
Format:Hardcover
Kenneth Pollack has provided essential background reading for every member of the public who wants to have an intelligent opinion on the question of what we should do about Iraq. If you're like me, you have a hard time remembering who did what to whom when and why it matters -- and the first section of "The Threatening Storm" is devoted to a brief (100 pages) summary of Iraqi history, from colonial government through Saddam's rise to power, US relations with Iraq, the Iran-Iraq war, the Gulf War and the tortured history of the UN sanctions. If you read only this much, you will at least understand why the containment/sanctions regime has failed (and has no realistic chance of being revived in any productive form).

The second section of the book (another 100 pages) gives an overview of the situation today -- the massive police state run by Saddam, the nature of the threat he poses, and what other Persian Gulf states (and others in the area and in Europe) think of his regime. The description of Saddam's repressive policies and the threat he poses are both chilling (both more realistic and more scary than anything I have heard from our current Administration). The country-by-country overview of current attitudes toward Iraq and what US policy should be was particularly fascinating. Pollack carefully proceeds through each country, explaining their own particular interests in and policies toward Iraq, and how they wish the US to act. This section provides some very interesting perspectives that I have not seen elsewhere in the popular media, particularly on Jordanian, Syrian and Turkish interests.

In the final 200 pages, Pollack turns to an analysis of US policy options....

On the other hand, I also think that Pollack underestimates some of the problems associated with invasion. First, he more or less dismisses the need for a legal justification for invasion, saying it would be better if we had one, but it is not essential. I think that many Americans and most of our allies (in the Middle East and elsewhere) will find it hard to support any war that does not have an adequate legal cause. In the absence of overt provocation by Iraq, we at least need a United Nations mandate behind us. How can we call others "rogue states," if we ourselves act without an international consensus behind us? Second, Pollack makes a persuasive case that we can invade only with the support of the Saudis and other Gulf states, who will support us only if the Israeli-Palestinian dispute is at least quiet. That hardly seems likely in the near future. If invasion also turns out not to be feasible, we may be left with no option but deterrence. At least having read "The Threatening Storm," I now know what risks that entails.

Pollack is eminently well-qualified to write about Iraq, having served in the CIA and the National Security Council during the first Bush and the Clinton administrations. He writes well and provides enough detail to make his arguments compelling without bogging down in military detail. He gives all arguments a fair treatment, acknowledges that the costs of invasion will be high and vigorously advocates a rebuilding of the Iraqi state and economy as an essential element of any invasion policy. Nation-building is not Pollack's area of specialty, which shows in his chapter on reconstruction and probably makes him overly optimistic about what reconstruction will cost, its prospects for building a prosperous and stable Iraq, and its potential to rehabilitate the US in the eyes of the popular Arab world. Nevertheless, his point -- that it would be foolish for us to incur the cost of toppling one destabilizing regime only to allow chaos or another unstable regime to take its place -- is well taken, and undoubtedly other resources can fill in the nation-building picture.

Highly recommended to all who wish to have an informed opinion in the debate on Iraq. Read more ›

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
31 of 37 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent case for invasion, but maybe not this one February 19, 2003
Format:Hardcover
I just finished reading The Threatening Storm, and Mr. Pollack makes a powerful and richly documented case for regime change in Iraq at the earliest feasible date. As he says, invasion does seem like the best of a set of bad choices, if it is done with the proper preparation. And there's the rub: in Pollack's terms, several essential elements are missing at the present moment to proceed with invasion:

1) He sees it as essential that there is a sense that the war against Al Queda is well in hand. He specifically says that we should be beyond periodic alerts for terrorist attack in the U.S. Thank God I have plenty of duct tape.

2) Also essential from his perspective is at least a ceasefire in the Iraeli-Palestinian conflict with real positive momentum towards a settlement. We have never been further from this, with no daylight showing between Bush and Sharon.

3) The U.S. electorate must be prepared for the burden of nation building in Iraq. According to Pollack, this would involve an occupation of over five years, with at least 200,000 troops initially, tapering down to about 100,000 after five years, and with a semi-permanent presence of at least a division. He says the model must be Bosnia, not Afghanistan.

These are, from his perspective, essential criteria for a successful outcome for an invasion of Iraq. I'll let you be the judge as to whether these have been met.

(BTW, I think he would have advised focusing on these issues, rather than seeking Security Council support. His view of the fecklessness of the French is very prescient.)

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Necessary and critical reading to understand why we invaded Iraq.
This is the single most important book to read to understand the case for invading Iraq. As a work of historical importance it stands alone for explaining the "why" on the Iraq... Read more
Published on December 1, 2009 by Kevin Jaeger
4.0 out of 5 stars Why Saddam had to go
Kenneth Pollack, writing six months before the March 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, sets out a case legitimizing such a course of action. Read more
Published on November 4, 2008 by Randy A. Stadt
3.0 out of 5 stars Many reviewers are unfair
Many reviewers here are criticizing Pollack for supporting the Iraq war as it was waged, talking about the disaster Iraq is now and laying that at his feet. Read more
Published on June 8, 2008 by Ronaldinho
1.0 out of 5 stars OOPS!
Well Ken, guess you kind of blew it huh? Looking at the pathetic reviews here from 2002 I have to wonder do any of you feel any guilt? Even just a little? Read more
Published on May 5, 2007 by Eugene J. Reagan
5.0 out of 5 stars The truth about Iraq
Although some of the reviewers have applied descriptors such as "debunked" or "false," Pollack's book is an important study of the situation in Iraq prior to the 2003 invasion. Read more
Published on May 21, 2006 by Steve
2.0 out of 5 stars An Invitation to War
This is a polished proposal for the invasion of Iraq. It was highly praised in 2002. In retrospect, it was a bit too candid:

"Assembling a coalition would be infinitely... Read more
Published on December 7, 2005 by ct reader
1.0 out of 5 stars No forgiveness for you, Pollack
The passage of time has been devastating for this book, and the analysis of its author. While it could be argued that the removal of Saddam was certainly a plus for the people of... Read more
Published on September 3, 2004 by Patriot
3.0 out of 5 stars The benefit of hindsight
I read this book when it first came out. I thought it was very well researched, well written and had some very useful insights into reasons for going to war with Iraq. Read more
Published on August 31, 2004 by Helder Gil
1.0 out of 5 stars debunked
I wonder how all these bobbing heads feel now that Pollack's vision has been debunked. There are no weapons of mass destruction. Saddam was never a threat to the United States. Read more
Published on June 30, 2004
5.0 out of 5 stars Perfect explanation for those who do not understand.
Many Americans do not know that the US has been in Iraq for over ten years. It started when a US diplomat told Saddam, the US had no interest in his disputes with Kuwait. Read more
Published on June 25, 2004
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews




What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 





Look for Similar Items by Category