The Tyranny of Tolerance and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

FREE Shipping on orders over $25.

Used - Like New | See details
Sold by US 2 U.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading The Tyranny of Tolerance on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

The Tyranny of Tolerance: A Sitting Judge Breaks the Code of Silence to Expose the Liberal Judicial Assault [Hardcover]

Robert H. Dierker Jr.
4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (19 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition --  
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  
Image
Save on Popular Books This Summer
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more.

Book Description

December 26, 2006
For the first time, a sitting judge blows the whistle on America’s out-of-control courts.

A judge for more than twenty years, Robert Dierker has enjoyed a distinguished legal career. But now that career may be on the line. Why? Because he is breaking the code of silence that has long kept judges from speaking out to present a withering account of how radical liberals run roughshod over the Constitution, waging war on the laws of nature, the laws of reason, and the law of God.

Even those outraged by America’s courts will be shocked by Judge Dierker’s story of activist judges, deep-pocketed special interest groups, pandering politicians, and others who claim to stand for tolerance, equal rights, and social justice, but actually stand for something quite different—something closer to totalitarianism.

Citing not only Judge Dierker’s own experiences but dozens of other recent court cases, The Tyranny of Tolerance shows how the courts enable left-wing activists to ram their dangerous agenda down the throats of the American people. Consider:

• Why do the courts claim the power to tax us?
• Why is a Christian fired when he voices opposition to his employer’s favoring homosexuals?
• Why are airline pilots sued and sent to “diversity training” for recommending that suspicious-looking people of Middle Eastern appearance be kept off planes?
• Why does a judge who defends a monument to the Ten Commandments in a courthouse lose his job?
• Why are speech codes imposed on employers, university students, lawyers (and judges!), while “artistic” indecency is protected from even the mildest regulation?
• Why are peaceful abortion protesters thrown in jail, their right to free speech crushed?
• Why are white and Asian students denied admission to colleges and universities in the name of “diversity”?
• Why is an enemy fighter captured in Afghanistan granted access to U.S. federal courts, overturning judicial precedent safeguarding the president’s wartime powers—to say nothing of common sense?

With this passionate insider’s account, Judge Dierker reminds Americans what’s at stake in the battle for the courts: the Constitution, the success of the war on terrorism, the freedom to worship God, the ability to keep our families safe, the institution of marriage, and much more.

Fortunately, Judge Dierker shows how we can defeat the radical liberals’ tyranny of tolerance. By wresting back control of the courts and restoring the legal, moral, and religious principles embedded in the Constitution, we can ultimately reclaim the republic the Founders bequeathed to us.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

After an unpleasant experience when "femifascists" reacted to Dierker's unfavorable ruling on a sexual harassment case and targeted him for complaint to a judicial board, the Missouri circuit judge decided it was time to expose what he sees as abuses by radical liberals of the judicial system. He cites several instances, from legal cases and from his own time on the bench, of liberals exerting influence on the courts and, thereby, circumventing the intentions of the U.S. Constitution. He specifically focuses on their efforts to incorporate provisions of the Bill of Rights into the Fourteenth Amendment, which was originally aimed at ensuring equality to freed slaves, to make legal decisions regarding sex discrimination binding across all states. Dierker is concerned with the liberal focus on sexual issues, including equal rights for women and homosexuals. Noting the use of due process by liberals to "reform" American culture, Dierker cites recent cases involving the right to assisted suicide and gay marriage. From a decidedly conservative perspective and 20 years on the bench, Dierker cautions against liberal totalitarianism. Vanessa Bush
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

About the Author

Robert H. Dierker Jr. is a circuit judge of the Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit of Missouri. Before becoming a judge in 1986, he clerked for the Missouri Court of Appeals, worked in private practice, and served as assistant and associate counselor for the City of St. Louis. Judge Dierker holds his A.B. degree from St. Louis University, his J.D. degree from the University of Missouri at Kansas City, and his LL.M. degree from Harvard University.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Crown Forum; First Edition edition (December 26, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 030733919X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0307339195
  • Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6.4 x 1.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (19 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #660,711 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Maybe after a few the rest will get the message! Heavenly Scholar  |  5 reviewers made a similar statement
For those who are Not Lawyers - Read This Book!! Michael J. Mcdermott  |  3 reviewers made a similar statement
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
60 of 77 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Highlighting a fundemental problem December 31, 2006
By N. Perz
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Before the idiocy begins over whether or not the author should lose his job, perhaps a discussion about the book?

While I am a "liberal" in the conventional (and hopelessly ambiguous popular sense), TToT makes some valid points that need to be addressed by the public and the legal community. What is unfortunate, however, is the vitriolic and condescending nature of his rhetoric. (In fact, had I not already known the author to be an excellent judge, I would have dismissed the book outright as another rant from the very idiot-fringe that the author so despises)

There is a serious (although I would not necessarily say pervasive) problem in our legal culture in that law is manipulated as a means to personalized ends with little regard for internal consistency or philosophical principals. Beliefs are customized to fit personal goals rather than the other way around. While this is a fundamental hypocrisy for all of us as individuals (for some more than others), judges and lawyers are supposed to do better than this when working in the law.

TToT begins with a scathing attack on radical feminism and its effect (from the author's view) on the law. While I'm sure that most everyone will agree that the examples cited by Dierker are egregious, it also highlights the shortcoming of his argument: he picks the worst examples from the idiot-fringe of the ideological Left and implies that these views are controlling modern jurisprudence. This is a consistent theme to his approach. A bit of a straw-man, in my opinion.

Affirmative action is another big topic. It's really impossible to deny that affirmative action is reverse discrimination. Even its defenders (including the U.S. Supreme Court) seem to acknowledge it as such otherwise, why would they go to such lengths to create convoluted justifications of it? This is probably the best example of our subverting legal principles to facilitate "feel-good" public policy that allows our society to both avoid the guilt of injustice and avoid doing the heavy lifting necessary to fix the real problem.

The discussions of free speech and establishment of religion reveal similar shortcomings. But keep in mind, the author is using the worst examples to make the problems appear more severe than they really are. I was also disappointed at the unsophisticated nature of the "abortion" discussion. He could have at least acknowledged that dominion over one's own body (arguably at the very least, if not obviously) implicates a fundamental liberty interest. Each side to the abortion issue has compelling (and irreconcilable) moral/legal arguments.

While he makes a lot of good point on the public policy issues, he falls down on the "zipper issues." This, I think, reveals the fundamental hypocrisy of the "conservative" position: they want limited government just small enough to fit into everyone's bedroom. (Does anyone really believe that's what the Framers intended by their Constitution?) It's not that they don't want "judicial activism," it just that they want the courts to promote their particular beliefs (of course, at that point, it's magically no longer judicial activism).

If you think sodomy (homosexual or otherwise) is immoral, than don't do it. If you think pornography is vile, then don't buy it. Why should the law or the government care about what consenting adults do on their own time? Last I checked, this was still a free country. Freedom applies to "perverts" too (Dierker's term, not mine). TToT isn't really making a legal argument by this point; it's really just a personal rant about public immorality (which is fine--it is a free country after all).

The gay-marriage issue is another hot topic for TToT and another example of how the "conservatives" abandoned legal principle for personal preference (just as the "tyranny of tolerance" perpetrated by "illiberal-liberals" is accused of doing). It seems to me that if "equal protection" means anything, it means that the government cannot discriminate against arbitrary classes of persons based on immutable characteristics (race, gender, alienate, illegitimacy, etc.) unless it serves a (very) compelling public purpose. Homophobia aside, how can one seriously argue that sexuality is not an immutable characteristic? No one makes a conscious decision about their sexuality.

Now, if marriage were just a religious sacrament, then there'd be no problem. Churches can discriminate against anyone they want. The government, however, has created a legal status of marriage that conveys rights and privileges. How does one construct a serious legal argument for denying one class of personal these rights and privileges while granting them to another when there is not compelling public purpose in doing so (other than preserving the dominate culture's particular view of "family values"?) (Besides, if homosexual people want to know what it's like to lose half of their stuff in divorce court, how is that the government's concern?)

But I digress. Bottom line is, TToT isn't a systematic or deep analysis of the contradictions in our legal system. While I personally take issue with many of Deirker's arguments and his manner of presenting them, he does make a good number of valid points that need to be considered and addressed by anyone who professes to be an "officer of the Court." While perhaps lacking in his eloquence, Deirker is a sort of Socratic gadfly pulling at the fraying threads holding together the hypocrisies so many "liberals" stitch together to justify their worldview.

There's nothing unethical or unprofessional in his writing this book. I shudder when I imagine the PC-police and other intellectual pigmies gathering their forces in the St. Louis area to try to punish the judge professionally for speaking truth to power. Hopefully, that won't happen. It would be a shame (and rather ironic) to see this "tyranny of tolerance" show it's face in such a way.

Overall, I'd give the book three start but I have to give him an extra one for having the stones to publish this knowing what kind of reactions he'd have to put up with.
Was this review helpful to you?
31 of 40 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Mr. O'Connor's Review January 5, 2007
By CDB
Format:Hardcover
Mr. O'Connor tosses out an open-ended and unsupported question about Judge Dierker's judicial ethics for having... written a book based on his judicial experience, legal philosophy and social views.(!?!)

If that activity consititutes a breach of some unidentified judicial ethical standard, it would have been a great shock to the late Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, William Rhenquist, who wrote a handful of books as a sitting justice of that court. It will also be a shock to the Judge who is arguably America's leading scholar-judge, the Hon. Richard Posner of the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (and the University of Chicago Law School), who has written more than two-dozen books on a vast array of topics, and who maintains an active weblog on which he and a fellow member of the U of C faculty share their views. And, a review of Amazon.com will turn up about ten titles written by current Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The late Justices William O. Douglas and Thurgood Marshall wrote books, articles and reminiscences of all kinds. I could go on and on and on with examples. The list of books written by sitting judges, in their own names, as judges, would fill an entire library of moderate size.

As an attorney in the State of Michigan, familiar with the life and writings of Justice John Voelker a/k/a Robert Traver, I am aware of no ethical rule that required him to publish under a pseudonym, and I know of nothing in our state's history of ethical decisions that would demand that commercial publication was somehow acceptable under a pseudonym, but not in a judge's real name. I do not impugn the memory of Justice Voelker, of course. I just don't understand how his example proves anything that Mr. O'Connor posits to the users of Amazon.com with regard to "The Tyranny of Tolerance."

I think Mr. O'Connor owes Judge Dierker an apology and the rest of us an explanation.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
12 of 16 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Important conversation on a worthy subject... January 20, 2007
Format:Hardcover
I was enriched by this examination of the subtle and scary alteration of our constitution's intended separation of powers by the activist liberal judiciary of the past 50 years. A well written book from the constitutional strict-constructionist viewpoint. Dierker's educated and experienced insights are chilling and all too familiar. This book could be considered the non-fiction version of 1984!
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
1.0 out of 5 stars No Justice with this Judge
It's hard to miss the fact that the Judge is hard-core radical right wing. He slightly modified Rush Limbaugh's 'feminazi' to 'femifascist' in a weak attempt to distance himself... Read more
Published 2 months ago by C. Cassidy
2.0 out of 5 stars SOMEONE GIVE THE AUTHOR A VALIUM
THE TYRANNY OF TOLERANCE is a shopping list of power grabs by the left who use slippery semantics to justify what they do. Nothing new there. Read more
Published on June 30, 2008 by James B. Johnson
5.0 out of 5 stars MANDATORY READING for every PAST,PRESENT and FUTURE LAW GRADUATE !!!
I'm going on eigthy years, don't have too many left but this country has
almost reached the point on the airport runway called "the point of no
return". Read more
Published on January 9, 2008 by Heavenly Scholar
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Expose of this countries out of control Courts
Read This Book! This is a well presented expose of the courts in the US and how wrong they have gone by trying to pander to tolerance. Read more
Published on November 22, 2007 by Bookman
1.0 out of 5 stars Don't waste your money
This makes Levin's Men in Black look like a scholarly book. Tyranny of Tolerance makes no attempt at considering the complexities of some of the questions that the author... Read more
Published on August 17, 2007 by Dubitato
5.0 out of 5 stars A Needle of Truth out of the Haystack of Judicial Deception
Political Correctness is a passive aggressive form of tyranny but one of the most dangerous tyrannies nonetheless. Read more
Published on May 27, 2007 by Kenneth D. Willis
5.0 out of 5 stars The Code Exposed
"Tolerance" is one of those words that have a positive connotation so it is no surprise that the Democratic Party has co-opted it as one of its watchwords. Read more
Published on May 26, 2007 by Martin Asiner
5.0 out of 5 stars Book review
This book is very importent to any who are concerned about the current fact the liberal judiciay is out of control and taking us down the road to complete judicial autocracy.
Published on April 10, 2007 by John T. Mccaffrey
5.0 out of 5 stars Wow! The Truth about the Legal Thought Police Pogrom
WOW!! This Book is a Rare Find - and a Very Important One.

Using Clear and Unambiguous language to explain in straightforward terms the current state of Constitutional... Read more
Published on March 19, 2007 by Michael J. Mcdermott
5.0 out of 5 stars OUTSTANDING
Finally someone who tells the truth about what's really going on with the liberal democratic judges,and how conservative judges are forced to follow the liberal ways or they are... Read more
Published on February 12, 2007 by Mark E. Maness
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category