3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Hardly a Book...more a manuscript, December 30, 2009
This review is from: Theatre of Incest (Paperback)
The 'book' is more a manuscript printed on a very small book size. I found the entire novel less like a novel with a story, but rather more anecdotal. It has a preponderance of excellent desciptions of feelings which seem more like he is analyzing himself as a psychiatrist. He manages to succinctly put down in words the males feelings during sex with his mother, then his daughter and finally his sister.
It was mildly erotic in his sexual forays overlaid heavily with analytical dialogue. It helps describes his feelings, but for me it read more like a small collections of interesting events (which is was) rather than a novel with a beginning, middle and end.
I didn't really feel like I was reading a book. It is a book in the loosest of definitions in my opinion. It has a front and back cover.
I feel if he could have taken what he wrote and expanded it into more of a story of people and feelings with the psychological overlays on it...I would have felt more interested in it. As it was...it was too short and left this reader feeling like I was eavesdropping in a psychiatrists office on a man who had sex with his family.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Family funhouse, June 8, 2008
This review is from: Theatre of Incest (Paperback)
A man plagued by identity issues, not to mention voyeuristic sexual proclivities, finally achieves self-actualization when he gets a real, live participatory audience for his antics. In this universe, in a world where a mirror or doppelganger lurks around every corner, and people have immense amounts of time to lend to coital impulses, the fact that his sexual partners are all nuclear-family members is the least of the problems. This is a novel about power---supposedly feminine power, since at every step this man imagines himself as both victim and perpetrator---let's just say the guy's got some profound concerns with vagina dentata. He's devoured first by his mother, then his daughter, then his sister, even as he acknowledges that he's the one doing the penetrating. While his perception is that he's identifying with his mother, then his daughter, then his sister---becoming them by merging his body with theirs---identity in this world is just another word for alterity, even as the lines between male and female, and gay and straight, fade into obscurity. Life is only real when it happens behind one staging or another---windows, open doors, and finally, theater in the...round.
As in Lolita (although it's worth reminding ourselves here that Nabokov indulges none of the standard, pornographic discourse deployed here), Arias-Misson gives us a damned smart, too smart, narrator, who intellectualizes his experiences and responses, frequently turning back against his own rationalizations, and flat-out lying about his effect on "others" (assuming he can imagine them as separate beings). "Womanness," and otherness, are terrifyingly elusive concepts for him, much as he struggles to grasp (at) them; consequently, his detachment from his fears detaches the reader from the scenarios he concocts to control le feminine---le not-him. That is to say, there is titillation to be had here, but the guy's so brilliantly moronic in his analysis of why titillation is titillating to him that his musings, ultimately entirely narcissistic, kind of wreck the sexy part of the high. The book should also be read alongside The Story of O, and its critique of the location of feminine power in sexual scenes staged by men.
Potential readers may suffer a jerking of the knee when presented with a book about a guy who does his mother, daughter, and sister---your basic `tween-boy, wet-briefs nightmare. But in the end the storytelling has far more to do with the self-obsession that can result from representations of reflexivity, especially when familial roles become performative ones. We've all been to the holiday dinners in which everyone jumps into their family-role of origin. The only difference here is a lot more semen in the gravy. -KF
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No