Qty:1
  • List Price: $174.99
  • Save: $17.01 (10%)
Usually ships within 4 to 6 weeks.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
A Theory of Freedom has been added to your Cart
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Good | Details
Sold by vegasbookstore
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Hardcover as shown, former Library item, clean text, sound bind, slight wear
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

A Theory of Freedom Hardcover – August 26, 1988

ISBN-13: 978-0521342605 ISBN-10: 0521342600

Buy New
Price: $157.98
15 New from $107.76 10 Used from $32.23 1 Collectible from $152.24
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$157.98
$107.76 $32.23
Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Take an Extra 30% Off Any Book: Use promo code HOLIDAY30 at checkout to get an extra 30% off any book for a limited time. Excludes Kindle eBooks and Audible Audiobooks. Restrictions apply. Learn more.

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Year
Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 356 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press (August 26, 1988)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0521342600
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521342605
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.5 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #7,043,313 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Book Description

A radically unorthodox theory of rational action is the central idea in a reformulation of Kant's ethical and political thought, wherein rational action can be determined simply by principles, regardless of consequences.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Spencer Case on January 29, 2009
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
It is no exaggeration to say that this may be the most underrated political philosophy book of the last half a century. In "A Theory of Freedom," Stanley Benn develops an interesting theory whose scope encompasses not just freedom but belief, privacy and other aspects of human life. His starting point is a radically unorthodox theory of action. Whereas most philosophers accept Hume's divisions between fact and value, thought and sentiment, and belief and action, Benn is inclined to unify them. It is our beliefs and not our desires that commit us to action. Here is one example Benn gives of an "epistemic action commitment": suppose you ask me what day it is and I have a belief that today is Thursday. Now, all else being equal, this belief commits me to the action of responding appropriately when asked. A Humean would claim that my action of speaking up must stem from some desire, but Benn points out that my commitment need not be related to desire in any way.
In one of my favorite passages of the book, (underlined and marked with three exclamation marks in the margins of my copy,) Benn writes:

"Rationality in belief is no more and no less a matter of logical necessity than rationality in action. Just as a practical syllogism yields not an action but an action commitment as its conclusion, so a theoretical syllogism yields not a belief but a belief commitment."

In short, Benn's idea of freedom involves choosing one's own epistemic action commitments. Although I need to re-read this book to understand all the nuances of Benn's view, I believe that the freedom he is interested has more to do with the question of political freedom than the free will/determinism debate.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again