1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book - Bad Title, April 17, 2011
This review is from: Is There a Culture War?: A Dialogue on Values and American Public Life (Pew Forum Dialogue Series on Religion and Public Life) (Paperback)
This is a wonderful debate on a topic that has always interested me. These are four excellent scholars: James Davison Hunter, Gertrude Himmelfarb, Morris P. Fiorina, and Alan Wolfe.
The first thing I'll say is that this book is not titled well. Hunter says, "If the culture war is a myth and the real story is about the consensus that exists in "the middle." Then why is it that the middle cannot put forward, much less elect, a moderate who represents that consensus, with all of its complexity and ambivalence on so many issues? If the center is so vital, then why is it that the extremes are overrepresented in the structures of power - not least, political power?" - James Davidson Hunter (p32)
Wolf contends, in his 1998 book, that the polemics we get from political and media elites do not reflect the moderate majority. In 2006 he writes, "Far weaker than typical political commentary portrays it, the culture war is on its last legs, and those who continue to insist on fighting it are likely to find themselves on the sideline in America's political future." - Alan Wolfe (p43)
Something that doesn't exist can hardly be on its way out. Not for eight years b-god. But Professor Wolfe points out that compared to America in the 1860s and the 1960s this phenomenon we call a culture wars can scarcely be called a `war'. There are no massive battlefields or people bleeding to death in the streets.
None of these scholars deny that the words `culture wars' refers to something that has been going on in America since the late 60s. This debate is not about conjecture, that is, whether a culture war exists, but rather about the definition of the words `culture war', and its magnitude.
The consensus seems to be that there are about 15 percent extremists on the Left and Right, and about 70 percent moderates in the middle. People in the center may fall on either side of the many divisive cultural issues. But it's the political and media elites who command the red/blue division. Both sides in this debate agree on the importance of elites in the cultural divide. Where they differ is in whether the elites exploit issues that are truly divisive among the masses (i.e. there is a culture war), or if they exacerbate the hot-button issues that lead the masses hither and thither like sheep (i.e. they create the cultue war), or if they are playing to an audience that has pretty much left the building (i.e. there is no culture war save for the Sixties fetishes of the elites).
So the question becomes: Do the masses really care about these issues? I've been surfing Amazon non-fiction book reviews for some time now. And I've noticed that books that address the culture wars in one of its many aspects get a tremendous amount of attention in terms of its number of reviews. But a book that is well written, informative, and balanced, but without political consequences won't have anywhere near the number of reviews. I'm making the assumption here that most Amazonites are not elites. (Perhaps wannabe elites?) I think the culture war issues are important to a great many conscientious people. The popularity of so many media figures, and authors, on both sides of the culture wars speaks to this concern. But that brings up another issue.
Gertrude Himmelfarb speaks of the, "degree of moral and esthetic nihilism" (p79) in our culture. Nihilism, strictly speaking, is neither left nor right. And if nihilism is prevalent in the 70 percent moderate masses, then that would explain why they are not part of the culture war left or right. They just don't give a... care - one way or another. So how do we reconcile the word 'war' with the word 'nihilism'?
The culture wars emerged out of the turmoil of the late 60s. I think the paradox can be explained by a line in a famous poem by W. B. Yeats; a poem that has been permanently linked to this period:
"the best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity"
- The Second Coming, W. B. Yeats, 1920
I think we've incorporated Yeat's vision in our collective and individual psyches. I've read many accounts by professors over the last four decades that describe the nihilism of their students, and the lack of their genuine interest in moral questions. At the same time we have this desperate intensity on certain hot-button issues; tempers flare, posts flame.
If my description is accurate, I'd like to think this is a boomer phenomenon, a temporary manifestation of the `worst generation'. I'm all for Alan Wolfe's response: let's get over this culture war nonsense and address the real issues. I was encouraged by Obama's election, because, I think he has a gen-Xer attitude. But I don't think we're out of the woods yet. And I'm not so sure this nightmare we call the culture wars will ever end - even after we boomers are all gone.
It's funny that I can agree with all four of these scholars even as they can't agree with each other. This is a great book. There are many more angles than the one I provide. I'm surprised that in five years it hasn't gotten more reviews.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No