They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons [Paperback]

Jacob Heilbrunn (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: January 6, 2009

From its origins in 1930s Marxism to its unprecedented influence on George W. Bush's administration, neoconservatism has become one of the most powerful, reviled, and misunderstood intellectual movements in American history. But who are the neocons, and how did this obscure group of government officials, pundits, and think-tank denizens rise to revolutionize American foreign policy?Political journalist Jacob Heilbrunn uses his intimate knowledge of the movement and its members to write the definitive history of the neoconservatives. He sets their ideas in the larger context of the decades-long battle between liberals and conservatives, first over communism, and now over the war on terrorism. And he explains why, in spite of their misguided policy on Iraq, they will remain a permanent force in American politics.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

News of neoconservatism's demise has been greatly exaggerated, according to prolific journalist Heilbrunn, who profiles the largely (though by no means exclusively) Jewish makeup of the movement. Heilbrunn roots his interpretation of neoconservatism's Jewish character in the American immigrant experience, the persistent memory of the Holocaust and Western appeasement of Hitler, among other phenomena. Charting the movement's philosophy from its inception through the foreign policy vision crafted in the 1970s and the culture wars of the 1980s and '90s, Heilbrunn employs a quasi-biblical spin echoed in Old Testament-inspired chapter headings. With the exception of his grasp of neoconservatism's right-wing Christian contingent, Heilbrunn displays an innate understanding of the movement. He argues persuasively that though these self-styled prophets embrace an outsider stance, and though he believes they are happiest when viewed as the opposition, they will remain a formidable influence for the foreseeable future. Heilbrunn's analysis lacks rigor concerning foreign policy assumptions and ideological and economic motives, thus unintentionally leaving his subjects more historically isolated than they really are. His proximity to the conservative movement brings benefits and limitations to this historical analysis. (Jan.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

Review

“A fast-paced, edgy profile of the intellectuals whose views about Islam and the Middle East came to dominate foreign policy after 9/11.”
—Chicago Tribune

“Persuasive, wide-ranging. . . . Heilbrunn takes a long, nuanced measure of the neocon policy revolution.”
—The New York Observer

“Excellent. . . . Heilbrunn adroitly surveys the movement's history from the Trotskyist alcoves of the City College cafeteria up to the present day.”
—The New York Review of Books

“Thorough . . . fair. . . . They Knew They Were Right will fit nicely on the rapidly expanding shelf explaining Iraq.”
—The Washington Post

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 336 pages
• Publisher: Anchor; Reprint edition (January 6, 2009)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 140007620X
• ISBN-13: 978-1400076208
• Product Dimensions: 5.2 x 0.7 x 8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 8.5 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (12 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,234,993 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

39 of 43 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Readable Review of Important Topic, February 7, 2008

By 

W. Harwood "willyl" (Burlington, VT USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons (Hardcover)

The positives in this well-written book far outweigh any negatives. He makes fair, well-reasoned judgements. As a retired American diplomat and holder of a doctorate in European history, I have studied and experienced many of the issues discussed in it--human rights in the Carter Administration, for example. I always wondered who were the political appointees in the upper reaches of the Washington bureaucracy who set our policies, and why didn't they listen to us on the ground in unpleasant overseas places? It lays out the Neo-con stress on academics (most have graduate degrees), intellectual ability, combativeness, and adherence to a set of principles in defiance of logic and a clear-headed look at the facts. Heilbrunn's best moments are (1) when he points out the mistakes the Neo-cons make and why, and how their commonalities (not necessarily of religious background) made them a force in Washington; and (2) when he shows how their narrow view of the world got us into the Iraq debacle. Now I know the origin of their harsh self-righteousness -- Old Testament prophets. Having read their periodicals occasionally and their daily commentaries in the press for many years, I finally understand what lies behind them. You don't need to be a policy wonk (I'm not one) to understand this book.

20 of 21 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Insightful but lacking in rigor, April 27, 2008

By 

Michael White (Saint Louis, MO, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons (Hardcover)

Heilbrunn knows his subject, and writes with insight into what makes the neocon movement tick. He has had access to many of the major players, and he generally treats them fairly.

The primary problem with this book is the lack of rigor, as noted in the Publisher's Weekly review (on this Amazon page). I have no doubt that Heilbrunn is very familiar with what he's writing about, but often the book ends up just being one journalist's long thoughts on the subject, rather than a well-crafted argument. Obviously this book is not supposed to be an academic monograph, but more documented sources would have helped immensely. Too often I just had to take Heilbrunn's word for claims he was making, which meant that for much of the book I wasn't sure how much to believe. At other points, the author fails to develop important arguments, giving more space to the personalities and mind-set of his subjects. Finally, I don't think Heilbrunn gives enough space to key arguments of critics outside the neocon movement (as opposed to critics who were former friends or associates of key neocons - we do get to hear from them).

So, read the book for Heilbrunn's insights, gained from extensive face-to-face exposure with the key players, but don't expect this to be a rigorous book of political analysis.

17 of 18 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Nuanced and non-polemical, March 8, 2008

By 

W. Tuohy (Bay Area, California) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons (Hardcover)

For summaries of the content, see the material on this website from "Publisher's Weely" and the "Book Descripton." Each does a good job.

In my opinion this book is excellent. It captures differences among the neo-cons (personalities as well as political thinking), and describes how their positions, alliances, etc. have changed over time.

The author's politics are conservative (I am not) but thoughtful. Although critical, he is not on a witch-hunt. I consider the book eminently fair, not given to name-calling and exaggeration. In addition to the usual suspects, some surprise actors appear in the neo-con chronology, including Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

On a few topics the book left me wanting more information and/or analysis. (1) Given the heavy (predominant) Jewish presence among leading neo-con spokespersons, and the Biblical element in chapter headings, I hoped for more explanation of links between neo-con thinking and the Jewish Bible (aka Old Testament). No such luck. (2) The (self-described as Jewish) author's conclusions about how neo-con politics serves Israel leave me in something of a fog. Is the message like that of the then president of General Motors who famously said, "What's good for GM is good for America" (as in, what's I think is best for Israel automatically is good/best for the USA)? I am not sure whether the author is tip-toeing around this issue lest he be excoriated as a "self-hating Jew"/anti-Semite, or is making a nuanced point that escapes my understanding.
Nevertheless, this book ias a great read, and hard to put down.