or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
Sell Us Your Item
For a $2.00 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition [Paperback]

Alasdair MacIntyre
4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)

List Price: $25.00
Price: $23.75 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $1.25 (5%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 4 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, May 23? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback $23.75  
Sell Back Your Copy for $2.00
No matter where you bought them, get up to 70% back when you sell your books at Amazon.com.
Used Price$10.87
Trade-in Price$2.00
Price after
Trade-in
$8.87

Book Description

August 31, 1991 0268018774 978-0268018771
Alasdair MacIntyre—whom Newsweek has called "one of the foremost moral philosophers in the English-speaking world"—here presents his 1988 Gifford Lectures as an expansion of his earlier work Whose Justice? Which Rationality? He begins by considering the cultural and philosophical distance dividing Lord Gifford's late nineteenth-century world from our own. The outlook of that earlier world, MacIntyre claims, was definitively articulated in the Ninth Edition of the Encyclopaedia Brittanica, which conceived of moral enquiry as both providing insight into and continuing the rational progress of mankind into ever greater enlightenment. MacIntyre compares that conception of moral enquiry to two rival conceptions also formulated in the late nineteenth century: that of Nietzsche's Zur Genealogie der Moral and that expressed in the encyclical letter of Pope Leo XIII Aeterni Patris.

The lectures focus on Aquinas's integration of Augustinian and Aristotelian modes of enquiry, the inability of the encyclopaedists' standpoint to withstand Thomistic or genealogical criticism, and the problems confronting the contemporary post-Nietzschean genealogist. MacIntyre concludes by considering the implications for education in universities and colleges.


Frequently Bought Together

Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition + Whose Justice? Which Rationality? + After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Third Edition
Price for all three: $71.96

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal

MacIntyre argues that philosophy in general and ethics in particular cannot proceed by means of reasoning from neutral, self-evident facts accepted by all rational persons. Many late Victorian intellectuals believed exactly that, confusing the customs of their time with universal truths. MacIntyre makes little effort to conceal his scorn for this view. Nietzsche and his 20th-century disciples, including Foucault and Deleuze, emphasized force and radical conflict rather than consensus; and though MacIntyre displays more respect for these genealogists (as he terms them) than for the encyclopedists, he does not follow in their path. Instead, he calls for a revival of Thomism. Aquinas combined the best features of Aristotle and Augustine into a synthesis that for MacIntyre has yet to be equaled. The author's careful exposition extends and develops his After Virtue ( LJ 9/15/81) and Whose Justice? Which Rationality? ( LJ 3/15/88). Highly recommended.
- David Gordon, Bowling Green State Univ., Ohio
Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Review

"MacIntyre's discussion is extremely engaging and most valuable. . . ." -- The Christian Century, January 16, 1991

"MacIntyre's work deserves the careful attention of every scholar of religion. . . ." -- Journal of Religion, January 1992

"This book delivers what the name MacIntyre promises: an account that is engaging, learned, and challenging. . . ." -- Choice, February 1991

"Within the past . . . decades, MacIntyre has emerged as one of the most important moral philosophers in the English-speaking world. . . ." -- Review of Metaphysics, December 1990

"[T]hese chapters surely show that [MacIntyre] must be the past, present, future and all-time philosophical historians' historian of philosophy." -- New York Times Book Review, August 12, 1990

Product Details

  • Paperback: 241 pages
  • Publisher: University of Notre Dame Press (August 31, 1991)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0268018774
  • ISBN-13: 978-0268018771
  • Product Dimensions: 6.3 x 0.8 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 5.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #104,485 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Alasdair MacIntyre is Senior Research Professor of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame. He is the author of several bestselling books, including After Virtue, Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, and A Short History of Ethics (a Routledge Classic).

Customer Reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
(6)
4.7 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
32 of 33 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Clarifies the alternative streams of modern thought. January 7, 2002
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
It is not often that a book of moral philosophy provides both a deep education in the history and content of thought, and a concrete set of alternatives to transform modern living.

In this book, MacIntryre argues that the three supposedly incommensurable approaches to moral life that are left on the table in modern moral philosophy ought to be acknowledged. The battle between the three approaches is too often papered over. A better method would be to acknowledge to students that the Universities themselves are at war over these approaches, and are in fact an arena for this conflict, rather than an equal and uninvolved home for all ways of thinking.

He is right. Any student of philosophy recognizes quickly that the instructors are speaking within incommensurable theories, speaking past one another. This book explains why, and does not attempt to provide a solution, other than to recognize that a war is going on.

A Thomist like MacIntrye argues that a child must be brought up within the traditions of the truth as preparation to learn the truth. Yet modern science and the 19th century encyclopedists argue that truth is progressive. And Nietzche argues that an exposition of truth is merely the will to state the truth as seen by the person, a form of the will to power.

These incommensurable approaches can only be the source of conflict in learning. To win, MacIntyre argues, would require one to transcend the others by explaining the problems of the other modes of thinking, solving those problems for the other mode, and moving the debate on. None have as yet triumphed, although MacIntyre holds out hope for Thomistic arguments, based in Aristotle and moving from there.

His discussion of the Augustine/Aristotle debates of the 14th Century Parisian university is rivetting (OK, I admit it, I am exaggerating). This is a difficult but worthwile compendium of lectures, informative and educational. A reader will understand modern philosophy better as a byproduct of reading this book.

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
27 of 29 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars a essential text for those interested in moral philosophy February 13, 1999
By A Customer
Format:Paperback
In Three Rival Versions Alasdair MacIntyre contends that there are three primary modes of moral inquiry. The first he calls encyclopeadia and is primarly a cateloging of moral principles understood as mirroring reality by post-Enlightenment moral philosophers. The second is the genealogical method which finds its orgin in Nietzsche's critique of morality. Although many think of these two modes of inquiry as exhaustive of the possible modes of inquiry, MacIntyre claims that there is a third alternative rooted in the Thomistic tradition. In Three Rival Versions MacIntyre articulates and defends this third alternative against the encyclopeadic and genealogical versions of moral inquiry. This work is an essential text for understanding the contemporary debates in moral philosophy.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Clarifies the alternative streams of modern thought. January 7, 2002
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
It is not often that a book of moral philosophy provides both a deep education in the history and content of thought, and a concrete set of alternatives to transform modern living.

In this book, MacIntryre argues that the three supposedly incommensurable approaches to moral life that are left on the table in modern moral philosophy ought to be acknowledged. The battle between the three approaches is too often papered over. A better method would be to acknowledge to students that the Universities themselves are at war over these approaches, and are in fact an arena for this conflict, rather than an equal and uninvolved home for all ways of thinking.

He is right. Any student of philosophy recognizes quickly that the instructors are speaking within incommensurable theories, speaking past one another. This book explains why, and does not attempt to provide a solution, other than to recognize that a war is going on.

A Thomist like MacIntrye argues that a child must be brought up within the traditions of the truth as preparation to learn the truth. Yet modern science and the 19th century encyclopedists argue that truth is progressive. And Nietzche argues that an exposition of truth is merely the will to state the truth as seen by the person, a form of the will to power.

These incommensurable approaches can only be the source of conflict in learning. To win, MacIntyre argues, would require one to transcend the others by explaining the problems of the other modes of thinking, solving those problems for the other mode, and moving the debate on. None have as yet triumphed, although MacIntyre holds out hope for Thomistic arguments, based in Aristotle and moving from there.

His discussion of the Augustine/Aristotle debates of the 14th Century Parisian university is rivetting (OK, I admit it, I am exaggerating). This is a difficult but worthwile compendium of lectures, informative and educational. A reader will understand modern philosophy better as a byproduct of reading this book.

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category