The Tibetan Empire in Central Asia [Paperback]

Christopher I. Beckwith (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: March 8, 1993

This narrative history of the Tibetan Empire in Central Asia from about A.D. 600 to 866 depicts the struggles of the great Tibetan, Turkic, Arab, and Chinese powers for dominance over the Silk Road lands that connected Europe and East Asia. It shows the importance of overland contacts between East and West in the Early Middle Ages and elucidates Tibet's role in the conflict over Central Asia.

Editorial Reviews

Review

[The] author has succeeded in his task, thanks to his sound method of analysis and to his command of the languages of the relevant texts: Tibetan, Chinese, Arab, Turkic. Particularly the thorough and felicitous utilization of the Arab sources is one of the most pleasant features of the book. -- Luciano Petech, Central Asiatic Journal



A most impressive work by an excellent scholar. -- Richard N. Frye, International Journal of Middle East Studies



An absorbing and highly original narrative of imperial rivalries that is of particular interest to comparative historians. -- Choice

Product Details

• Paperback: 292 pages
• Publisher: Princeton University Press (March 8, 1993)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0691024693
• ISBN-13: 978-0691024691
• Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 6.2 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #431,773 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • #74 in Books > History > Asia > Tibet

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

21 of 21 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Indispensible to students of Tibetan history, August 18, 1999

By 

Thomas Cole ([e-mail]) (California, USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Tibetan Empire in Central Asia (Paperback)

I found this book to be indispensible to serious students of Central Asian history as well as readily accessible to the casual novice interested in the history of Tibet. It formed the basis of my own studies on the origins of the Tibetan people as well as assisting me in placing their weavings in a Central Asian context, rather than the more popular Buddhist/Chinese perspective. Well written and easily understood with essentially interesting footnotes, anyone truly interested in further understanding the origins of the Tibetan people, their current religion and myths needs have this relatively brief tome in their library. An excellent piece of research and an easy read.

10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Fine resource on politics, military of medieval Tibet., May 12, 1997

By A Customer

This review is from: The Tibetan Empire in Central Asia (Paperback)

Beckwith covers the early history of Tibet for those of us who do not read Chinese, Khotanese Saka, and other fun languages. Places the Tibetans in the constellation of national empire-builders. Well-written and exhaustively footnoted, this is not a coffee-table book, yet is accessible to the non-specialist. Should be of interest to political and military historians of the milieu, as well as to Arabists, Central Asianists, and Sinologists.

However, suitably rewritten and with many color photos this would make a fine coffee-table book indeed.

14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Is This Really the Best There Is?, June 18, 2008

By 

Suchos - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Tibetan Empire in Central Asia (Paperback)

A serious student with a certain background in Tibetan and Chinese history may find this book useful -- perhaps even indispensible. For everyone else, it may prove impenetrable. The two maps are almost totally worthless, and the text assumes a basic familiarity with place names and non-Tibetan figures that is inconsistent with a general survey. My background is in the Near East and Central Asia; where Beckwith referred to place names in those areas, I understood him well, but when discussing Tibet or China, I did not.

The same is true of facts concerning contemporary empires. The Abassid revolution, for example, is mentioned only in passing, without any kind of discussion on its effect on Tibet and Central Asia. Obviously an in-depth discussion of the Abbassids is not necessarily appropriate for a monograph on Tibet, but Beckwith's greatest strength (his focus on Tibet's neighbors to explain events in Tibet) makes it a virtual necessity for this book.

This book is a political and military history. If you want details on Tibetan religion, culture, or literature, you will not find them here. Rather, we have a catalogue of battles, a desciption of waxing and waning influence in the Central Asian power struggles. I concede I may be asking the impossible -- not being a specialist, I don't know if such information even exists. Of course, Beckwith could have so stated.

The book starts and ends abruptly. The formation of the empire is disposed of with a few paragraphs. The disintigration of the empire is noted simply, with no discussion whatsoever of the decline that led to it, or the reasons that the once-mighty empire was irrevocably broken.

The book contains what should have been a helpful table of contemporary rulers. But the Tibetan names used in the text are not always the same as those used in the table, making it confusing and practically worthless for the non-specialist. And the Tibetan succession cannot easily be pieced together from the text alone because of the huge gaps in the narrative where the author focuses on other nations, such as Turgis campaigns against the T'ang.

In a sense, this is not a history of Tibet itself, so much as a history of all the major powers in Central Asia and their relationships with one another during the time period in which Tibet constituted an imperial power. That is useful as far as it goes, of course, but leaves Tibet itself almost as unknown at the end of the book as at the beginning.

I would recommend this book to specialists, except that specialists probably do not need it. I cannot recommend it to non-specialists, because of the many problems with it.