An anthropological study of time, and how it is employed, to discuss humans and human endeavors.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Johannes Fabian is professor of cultural anthropology at the University of Amsterdam.
Matti Bunzl is professor of anthropology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
--This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Not a thriller, but a foundation of modern anthropology,
By
This review is from: Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object (Paperback)
A lot of the critique of how anthropologists "make their object" in the 80s and 90s can be traced back to some of the ideas in this book. It is a profoundly important analysis of how time is manipulated in such a way as to create a boundary between "them" and "us." As the other reviewer says, it is not an easy read, but I don't think you can really know the history of recent anthropological theory without giving this book some of your attention.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A critical view of anthropology,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object (Paperback)
In this book the anthropologist Johannes Fabian, who received his PhD from the University of Chicago, brings a fresh insight to a central topic in anthropology: time. Fabian criticizes structuralism's perspective of time and aims to prove how time is often ignored in ethnography as coevalness is usually denied to the other.
14 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting yet unreadable,
By A Customer
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object (Paperback)
The thesis of this book I found quite interesting and accurate: that anthropologists consider their subjects as existing in a different time from themselves, in some mythical past. However, the style of the writing seemed as if it was literally translated from the German. I found it very difficult to understand, opaque, and wondered many times why I was bothering to slog through the thing.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|