7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Work, work, work, work, work..., October 26, 2002
This review is from: Of Time, Work, and Leisure (Paperback)
What is the ultimate goal of a society? Two possible answers are: Work and Leisure. The goal of current US culture appears to be work, at least for the majority of people. Why shouldn't it be leisure instead?
This book, written in the very early 1960s, is still relevant today for the questions it asks, which are very neglected but of utmost importance, viz., is the "good life" solely constituted of work? This question is analyzed from a 1960s perspective so it is, sadly, fairly dated in that respect (though it is interesting in its analysis of how people spent leisure time four decades ago). The book is also a little plodding, and the argument is presented in a very disjointed and sometimes overly statistical fashion. I had to literally struggle through some of the later chapters. Nonetheless, the issues are still very relevant, and the questions De Grazia asks are still worth asking today (in fact, they may be more pressing today than they were in the 1960s).
The book does include a good historical survey of how the world has looked at leisure since the time of Aristotle. This is how the book begins, and it is completely engrossing for the first few chapters. De Grazia discusses the sticky issues surrounding leisure and slavery in a society, and outlines a history of how we have been gradually progressing "toward the work society."
This could easily have been a book in itself. Unfortunately, the book begins to drag later on. It gets bogged down in details and hard to follow arguments that contrast strongly with the book's beginning. There is, nonetheless, plenty to sink one's teeth into as the book's pace slows (the pace never stops, and it never becomes outright boring, it just doesn't maintain its momentum).
You will not get answers to any difficult questions in this book. What you will get is insight into the issues raised. In short, it is a rewarding but arduous read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
It'll never happen..., November 28, 1997
This review is from: Of Time, Work, and Leisure (Paperback)
If you look at Van Gogh's My Room at Arles wondering why you wish your life were that simple... here's a 500 page explanation. It's a little hard to follow at times, often out of focus and it ends in poorly justified optimism. I'd be surprised if it helped anybody figure out whether mankind is moving forward or backward. Yet, the issue is essential in the USA, at least for those still struggling to understand the rhythms of this country. Of course, the book has a wider and deeper scope (geographically and otherwise) but you'll find you can apply its thoroughly documented (i.e., based on facts, figures, statistics and historical trends) logic to your own little world... (Where little is not used derogatorily. Non multa sed multum.) Finally, unforgivable as it may be, here's a quote that could come from this book but it doesn't: "the average American should be portrayed as a victim of the advertising and marketing industry, which has suckered him into buying a lot of junk that he doesn't need and that is very poor compensation for his lost freedom". If you know who wrote the above, you'll agree that this book's ending revery is completely pardonable.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
enlightening, October 21, 2009
This review is from: Of Time, Work, and Leisure (Paperback)
As a graduate student I was required to read this book. I was amazed at how relevant it is, even 50 years after it was written. De Grazia's points of time and the clock are fascinating and made me truly think about how I spend my time and leisure.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No