Qty:1
  • List Price: $69.00
  • Save: $7.86 (11%)
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by DataLine
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: ~~~LOOK~~~ Paperback. This paperback book is actually like new in every way, EXCEPT there is a spot on the cover about the size of a dime where the ink is rubbed off. It also has some ink fading from the flourescent lighting. It does show minor retail shelf wear along the edges so we did not list it as new. There are no markings, writing or highlighting in this book. Cover is clean. Pages are Crisp. Binding is Strong. ELIGIBLE FOR AMAZON'S FREE SHIPPING PROGRAM!
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Too Many Women?: The Sex Ratio Question Paperback – March 1, 1983

ISBN-13: 978-0803919198 ISBN-10: 0803919190 Edition: Second Printing

Buy New
Price: $61.14
22 New from $33.99 22 Used from $2.65 1 Collectible from $109.25
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$14.99
Paperback
"Please retry"
$61.14
$33.99 $2.65
Best%20Books%20of%202014
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Hero Quick Promo
12 Days of Kindle Book Deals
Load your library with Amazon's editors' picks, $2.99 or less each today only. Learn more

Product Details

  • Paperback: 280 pages
  • Publisher: SAGE Publications, Inc; Second Printing edition (March 1, 1983)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0803919190
  • ISBN-13: 978-0803919198
  • Product Dimensions: 5.5 x 0.7 x 8.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 13.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,188,488 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 12 people found the following review helpful By Gaetan Lion on January 10, 2012
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Anthropologists state that men are naturally promiscuous seeking pleasure with fertile (sexy) women. And, women want to nest with (wealthy) men of upper social standing. This is nature's way of propagating our specie. Guttentag and Secord present another theory that explains more. A popular article in The Atlantic (All the Single Ladies, November 2011) has revived interest in their 30 year old theory.

The two social scientists developed a powerful explanatory model. At its foundation are two driving powers. The first one is whatever sex is in short supply has more "dyadic" power as they have more choices of mates. The second power, structural power, is related to the sex that is dominant within the social infrastructure (Government, Justice, business, etc...). Throughout history, men have controlled structural power.

The coauthors' brilliant insight is in figuring out how the interaction of dyadic and structural powers influences a society's culture. Men's structural power is a given. And, when women have the dyadic power (sex ratio > 100, shortage of women) you will have a traditional society with familiar roles. Even though women have more mating choices, men will counter women's dyadic power with their own structural power to restrict women's potential sexual freedom. In such a traditional society, women's virginity before marriage will be praised and so will marriage, motherhood, and loyalty. Morality will be severe and restrictive. At such time, the arts often promote romantic love and devotion to an idealized woman. However, when men have the dyadic power (sex ratio < 100, surplus of women) you will have a libertine society. Men and women will be more promiscuous. Marriage will be often derided. And, the arts will reflect this libertine culture.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Owl on January 3, 2014
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
WHAT "TOO MANY WOMEN" IS ABOUT: In 1975, Marcia Guttentag wondered what if there were some populations with more of one gender than another. "What," she wrote, "would the social consequences be?"

The sex ratio (or gender ratio) as computed in "Too Many Women?" considers first the marrying, child-bearing population usually 20 to 40 years old. The number of men in this population is divided by the number of women, then multiplied by 100. Thus, if there are 110 men to every 100 women in a population, the sex ratio is 110. The choice of which is numerator and which is denominator is the researcher's, though for convenience, it is usually men as numerator, women as denominator.

As a starting point, the book on page 15, Figure 1.1 shows the sex ratios for the United States from 1790 to 1975, using U.S. Census data. Until 1950, men outnumbered women in the marrying-age population, after which the ratio dropped steeply to 1960. Since then the sex ratio has climbed to the current ratio of about 100: approximately equal numbers of marrying age men & women.

Similar data were extracted and extrapolated by Guttentag and Secord for classical Athens & Sparta, medieval Europe, Orthodox Jews, and Frontier, Southern, and Victorian women in the U.S. Their research method then used qualitative reports including an analysis of Talmudic statements regarding the roles of men & women and quantitative data such as age of marital partners and women's employment to answer the question, "What would the social consequences be?"

THEIR ANSWERS: Their analyses are given in four information-rich chapters in the section titled "Clues from the Past" and four chapters titled "Observations from Recent Times.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again