Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Top Ten: Beyond the Farthest Precinct (Top Ten)
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Top Ten: Beyond the Farthest Precinct (Top Ten) [Import] [Paperback]

Paul DiFilippo (Author), Jerry Ordway (Author)
2.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback --  
Paperback, Import, September 22, 2006 --  

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details

  • Paperback: 136 pages
  • Publisher: Titan Books Ltd (September 22, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1845762983
  • ISBN-13: 978-1845762988
  • Product Dimensions: 10.1 x 6.5 x 0.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 7.8 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 2.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)

 

Customer Reviews

11 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (5)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.1 out of 5 stars (11 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

37 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Di Filippo lowers Moore's quality level by several notches, August 5, 2006
I was very much looking forward to reading this. I wanted to see how Di Filippo (as far as I know a newbie to the comics genre, and the author of a few quite impressive books) does with the legacy of master Alan Moore.

A lot worse than I thought he would.

SPOILERS: There are several points I just don't get. I. E. How can he revive a character - Girl One - for no obvious reason and then do NOTHING with her. He gave her about two lines of dialogue throughout the book and showed nothing of the impact her reappearance would have on the former colleagues and friends.
Why does he simply ignore important developments laid out by Moore's run, like Smax and Rexa not being able to admit that they are brother and sister, because of the legal problems involved? (There was so much potential in this particular detail.)
Why does he come up with - sigh! - destinies that have to be fulfilled? Is this some "Lord of the rings" for the poor?
Why does he stop all character development or - to the contrary - abandons that which has already been done? The characters are so devoid of any depth it almost made my cry.
Why does he have to take a minor character from an earlier - and very tragic - episode that paraphrases the AIDS-threat in a superhuman society, and make him a super-villain? This turn of events is so absurd that it even belittles the original story.

Enough. I could go on an on. If you really liked Moore's run, avoid this at all costs. If you didn't particularly care about it before, you can try this book. Di Filippo doesn't seem to care too much, too. I wish he would have stayed with writing novels. I really enjoyed his "Steampunk trilogy". Never could get my hands on a copy of "Linear City", though.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Utterly Dreadful, November 1, 2006
By 
ShowTunes (Aurora, CO United States) - See all my reviews
I don't expect the person who follows in Alan Moore's shoes to be as good as the master, but to be this bad is truly astonishing.

Too many new (and old) characters with little to do; the personalities of old characters completely changed (King Peacock and Peregrine are the worst offenders); way too much going on--just when you're following one thread, another starts; some truly stupid cosmic blabbery; little or no continuity from the earlier stories to this one (Smax/Rexa and Kemlo/Annette's relationships, which had secret elements to them earlier, are now common knowledge for no apparent reason); standard superhero art with none of the whimsy that Gene Ha provided; an ending that makes ZERO sense.... boy, I could go on for days.

Did Alan Moore really approve this stuff? I knew he was burned out on the US comics industry, but he really must loathe it to let something this bad be associated with his name. I hate having wasted money on this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Unsatisfying, July 4, 2007
This is definitely a cut below Alan Moore's Top Ten. The fact that some of the relationships are now public didn't bother me as much as it did some of the other reviewers (this takes place five years after the original Top Ten, which is a long time to keep a relationship secret). But the subplots generally aren't very well thought out, a lot of the characters are just sort of taking up space, and most egregiously, the main plot isn't tied up very well. It's not a horrible book, but it really suffers in comparison to Top Ten and Smax.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews









Only search this product's reviews



What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 
(94)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


So You'd Like to...



Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:





i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...