Truck Month Textbook Trade In Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc $5 Albums Fire TV with 4k Ultra HD Mother's Day Gifts Amazon Gift Card Offer ctstrph2 ctstrph2 ctstrph2  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Fire, Only $39.99 Kindle Paperwhite AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Shop Now STEM

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on March 10, 2013
Topgrading is a 12-Step program for increasing the percentage of "A Players" you hire from an average of 25% to some remarkable number--70%, 80% or even 90%. I found the parts of the book that I read repetitive and a bit breezy. There's a free 80-page e-book on the author's web site for those who value their time and money.

The impressive 65,000 number that appears in the book refers to Dr. Smart's interviews with "...6,500 managers, with an average of 10 jobs each...". These managers report a 25% success rate in hiring high performers.

The amazing 70-90+% post-Topgrading success ratios seem to come from Topgrading Step 12--"ANNUALLY MEASURE YOUR TOPGRADING SUCCESS". Every new hire is graded at their first anniversary by a committee of four "...in relation to the stated accountabilities" (page 177.) At this one-year point, employees are either considered an "A Player" or they are put on a performance improvement plan. So I have to ask, isn't just meeting expectations the very definition of a "B Player?" Can someone who's been through Topgrading tell me if managers typically set unrealistic goals to replace borderline performers or do they dumb down the goals to avoid the consequences?

So lets talk about the Topgrading TORC--the Threat of the Reference Check. With Topgrading, your candidates will be asked to arrange a "personal reference" call with every prior supervisor. The author thinks it will only drive away C Players--30 candidates, 20 complete applications--the TORC flushed out 10 problems, simple as that. Might it also repel the very best candidates as well? The scientist with the breakthrough research, the out-of-the-box thinker who will have a game-changing idea for your web site, the empathetic service rep who can calm even your pickiest customers and retain a key account--these people may just walk away. That Dr. Smart uses the rather outdated "lines of code per day" metric in an example about programmer productivity suggests he may be more familiar with sales than software development. (By the way, if you worked for a Topgraded company and cannot get a "personal reference" from your former supervisor, search the book for the word "hypocrite" to see why.)

Then there's the new Topgrading Snapshot to consider. At the outset of Topgrading, a one-page Topgrading Snapshot is needed for every current employee. You can register on the author's web site to try this for yourself. (Two free Snapshots come with the physical book--a $50 value.) According to one happy customer, the Topgrading Snapshot allows you to screen candidates in 10 seconds without reading the entire resume. The value of any visual exhibit depends on how faithfully it represents the important data--what is included, what is excluded, how information is encoded to colors plus the juxtaposition, shape and area of the graphical elements. Be sure to run a Snapshot on one of your high-performing women who took maternity leave to nurture her offspring. Don't forget to Snapshot Ol' Charlie (Smart's character who is fired for not doing his job, but who might sue because he's over 40.) Pick any good experienced worker. See how the Snapshot crams his 30 years of experience into the same space as a candidate half his age, making each of his job polygons smaller--like a job hopper. In fact, run the Snapshot on all your high performers and see which ones wouldn't make it to the interview stage. In the software arena, this is called a regression test. It tells you if the changes you plan to implement are going to break something that's already working.

My definition of an honest salesman is someone who tells you what you want to hear over and over and over again until you stop listening--then takes that opportunity to tell you the truth. Topgrading--hire the best. Topgrading--no need to retain average workers. Topgrading--it turned our company around. Topgrading--scare away the charlatans. Topgrading--70% success promoting the right people--no more Peter Principle. Topgrading--it's at a tipping point, get on board. Amid the endless branding of Topgrading, the author does reveal a hiring "secret." Dr. Smart found some managers who reported hiring mostly A players. Even before Topgrading, these savvy managers knew how to get over 50% high performers. I won't reveal the secret. Why? Because the author had the decency to include this nugget in the third edition, undermining his arguments for the rest of his elaborate program.

Frankly, if the 12 Steps in Topgrading seem novel to you, maybe you need someone to shake up your HR department. But before turning your company over to Topgrading, wouldn't it be prudent to ask Dr. Smart some detailed questions? Perhaps you should make him fill out his own job application to show you how well it works. You will need the full list of prior clients going back to high school with dates and total billing (with certified financial statements to reconcile the data.) Is the relationship ongoing or terminated? What is the "reason for leaving"--the Snapshot allows: My Choice [green], Mutual Decision [mauve], 100% Employers Choice (terminated) [red], Not Leaving [green], Other Circumstances [grey]. What will the client say about Smart's work? The Snapshot "Boss Rating" allows: Excellent [green], Very Good [green], Good [mauve], Fair [red], Poor [red], and Impossible to Provide [grey]. Once you've seen the history, ask him to arrange a reference call with several clients of your own choosing.

Finally, a word about glowing case studies. 35+ companies are profiled--out of how many Topgraded companies? Where's the full data set? Managers love to take credit for growth, but we all know people who were successful due to circumstances. (I've been that person.) When your company is going like gangbusters, is it your "A Players" that made it happen or did years of patience, effort and teamwork by everyone else hold the company together long enough to finally enjoy some favorable market conditions or a new product launch? Do your salespeople go to Hawaii for reaching their quotas while the engineers go home to read technical journals? If Smart helped 35 companies in decades of work, that's great, but a discussion of the challenges is also in order.

If you're thinking I'm alone in my critical opinion of this HR approach, you might want to check out the reviews of the prior edition of this book to expand your sample size.
0Comment|34 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
VINE VOICEon February 27, 2014
The short version is that if a candidate has been through this process once and didn't get the job, regardless of reason, they're not likely to go through it again. That has unaddressed implications for the process.

The emphasis here is on interviewing and the candidate. It seems like the purpose of the methodology is to weed out the slick con-artist candidates and that's fair enough. That leaves a lot of assumptions about identifying good candidates, and it assumes a competent hiring manager/team. The passionate testimonials are intriguing, but in reality, at best, they stand against the usual hiring process which has no clear structure or consistency, starting with validated job "requirements."

The way the process is being implemented shows no respect for a candidate or candidate's time. The candidate, prior to any introductory screen or filter, is expected to spend hours preparing what's now an on-line submission. The candidate is also required to arrange interviews with all their prior supervisors, something that's loaded with assumptions about the supervisors (four of mine are dead, two don't speak English, and if a smart candidate left a company because of bad management....). In practice, candidates are often asked to prepare a job plan or roadmap, or some type of presentation. If a candidate is passionate enough to spend the time to jump through those hoops, it's their decision but if you talk to a candidate who HAS jumped through all those hoops and didn't get the job, they'll consistently tell you they wouldn't do it again.
0Comment|15 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on June 24, 2013
The entire book was an advertisement for more Topgrading software and products. The writing was put together in a very disorganized way. Buy a different hiring for success book!
11 comment|10 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 24, 2014
The first hour of the book simply is the author repeating himself on how wonderful the topgrading method is without ever talking about what it actually is.

The simple breakdown of the book is to hire the best people and your business will win.

Use this link to download the ebook from his site free. He offers it for free...
[...]
0Comment|5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on December 28, 2015
The author spends a lot of time trying to keep on selling his book...which i already purchased. Book would be better if the author stops "patting himself on the back" and restating how great the process is and just get to details on what the process actually is, and allow the reader to decide if the process is worthy of praise.
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on April 27, 2014
It was way too promotional for my tastes. The beginning of the book set the tone for me when the author said Ford's Nasser got his hiring practices wrong and as a result was not successful at managing the business. The author specifically said he was asked to help Ford but had to decline because he was way too busy.

The book may have merit, however, good luck to the reader trying to identify it through the infomercial.
0Comment|3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on April 3, 2016
The author has developed a method for screening candidates which is probably worthwhile. The book (and especially, the Kindle version) have serious problems that reduce its value considerably. The first 3 chapters are relentless, relentless, relentless self-promotion of his method and his according-to-him spectacular results and fabulous relationships with famous people. Good for you, but you've wasted hours of my life getting to the meat of your book. In the Kindle version the diagrams and illustrations are not scalable graphics, so they are worthless, because they cannot be expanded to a size where anything is visible. Large chunks of the content are thereby rendered completely useless. I sought out the referenced diagrams on the (heavily promoted) website, to find that yes they are available -- for a price. Sorry I spent money on this Kindle edition.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 4, 2012
For most of us, hiring great team mates is one of our most challenging tasks. This book will remind you that you don't have to settle and why settling never yields profits or happiness. Brad Smart teaches a proven formula for interviewing and screening applicants. This is a book that should be required reading for all management. I own a business with 200 employees serving over 600,000 customers each year. We've grown based on the strength of our team. I also work with elite corporate and mission critical teams. These teams are successful because they are great at identifying A players and redeploying B players. Topgrading is a tool, not a lofty concept, that leaders can implement now and prosper from forever. You don't have to settle for mediocrity, when you have an easy to use tool at your disposal.
0Comment|One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on March 16, 2016
Treats people disrespectfully. Have great ideas to check if candidate is lying or not. The approach is good the execution can be improved.
TORC makes sense - asking for supervisor reference makes sense. Verbiage is cynical. Not inspiring. There will be bad apples and makes sense not to hire them.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on November 13, 2015
You must read this book if you have a team or employ people in any capacity. Don't chicken out on the lessons of this book. My personal wealth would be 10X after 40 years as a business owner if I had this knowledge when I was 20 years old. You have to learn this methodology and apply it to your work and your life. This book and the perspectives taught will be life-changing. I recommend their website. I recommend their e-learning opportunities.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse