Most Helpful Customer Reviews
28 of 36 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Tabloid Trash, March 11, 2009
This review is from: Toy Monster: The Big, Bad World of Mattel (Hardcover)
If you are interested in what Mattel is really like as a company and a place to work or if you are truly interested in how the toy business operates, do not bother reading this piece of high-priced trash.
I was an employee of Mattel for eight plus years in the late 70's to the mid 80's and was eventually laid off (a euphemism for being fired) for being in the wrong place at the wrong time but I still value the years I worked there and do not share Oppenheimer's opinions about what a cruel environment it was to work in.
I started out to mark every error and unsubstantiated allegation I saw in the book in light blue pencil but I was making so many marks, I was ruining the book. I also realized that if I was to point out all of Oppenheimer's mis-information in detail that my review would be longer then the book itself.
He spends the first hundred or so pages trashing Ruth Handler and describing, in awe-struck terms, the sexual prowess of Jack Ryan, a gifted inventor but not the "Father of Barbie" as Oppenheimer claims. That is unless Ryan has an illegitimate daughter somewhere named Barbie.
Many of his major sources are suspect in that they were fired by Mattel and in some cases spent years suing the Company for improper termination, which cases they all lost.
He totally skips over the Ray Wagner, Glenn Hastings and John Ammerman years except in passing comments showing how callous they were. He never discusses how Mattel came back from the dead when the Electronics Division went bust and Glenn Hastings convinced the bankers that Mattel Toy Company was a viable business giving Art Spears, the Chairman, the time he needed to bring in new investors.
On the other hand, he spends almost a third of the book on Jill Barad someone who was President for less than five years.
A lot of his accusations are by implication and insinuation, hardly good journalism but then this book isn't journalism but a mostly unsubstantiated attack on Mattel.
I can't imagine why anyone who wasn't personally acquainted with the people in the book would want to plow through Oppenheimer's turgid and tired prose. His constant refrain of "more about that later" and his whining about people who would not talk to him while implying they had something to hide grew very tiresome.
Has Mattel and it's leaders screwed up from time to time? Of course. But as I watch major financial institutions and automobile companies crash taking the entire U.S. economy with them, I wonder why is Oppenheimer spending his time on a relatively small company that manufactures playthings?
The answer, I suspect is because of the fact that toys, particularly Barbie, resonate culturally. After all, what this author is interested in is selling books, not presenting a balanced picture of the good and the bad in the organization. He is in a word, salacious, rather than reasonable because that will sell his product.
I think it's instructive that the only positive blurbs on the dust cover are from C. David Heymann and Kitty Kelley, two other authors who would rather tear down than be objective.
If you do want to read this book, save your money and wait a short while until you will be able to buy it at a much reduced price out of the remainder bins at your neighborhood bookstore.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The Big, False, Made-Up World of Mattel, May 21, 2009
This review is from: Toy Monster: The Big, Bad World of Mattel (Hardcover)
As a Barbie collector since 1959, I was quite surprised to read such a poorly researched book about Mattel. I had a very hard time finding any true statements about anything in this book. Mr. Oppenheimer should know that a good book depends on how good the background research is, and this book has none that I can find, other than some trivial personality traits of Jack Ryan, the man who patented the Barbie doll's design. Jack Ryan was a government engineer, who was totally into the space age, after WWII in the 1950's. Mattel needed a designing engineer, to design the actual toys they were creating, so Ryan was hired. Ryan designed the Barbie doll's body- a head, torso, legs and arms- an almost complete copy of a Bild Lilli doll from Germany, which Ruth Handler bought and brought back to Mattel. Ryan also made the talking mechanism for Chatty Cathy and the Vrroom motors for the Mattel bikes. Ryan was an engineer that made the Handler's ideas come to life. He did not come up with the ideas, he only three-dimensionalized them and owned his government patents. He received royalties, like any other artist for his designs.
I was surprised to read in this book, that Ruth Handler started the story of how she came up with the Barbie doll, AFTER Ryan's death in 1991. If Mr. Oppenheimer had done any research at all, he would have found the most obvious History of Mattel, a book written by Ruth's husband and co-founder of Mattel, Elliot Handler. The book is titled The Impossible Really Is Possible-The Story Of Mattel and was written in the 1960's and printed in 1968. If Mr. Oppenheimer had read this history of Mattel, he would see the story of the Barbie dolls creation in print in 1968, and not made up after Ryan's death in 1991! Ryan tried and failed to sue Mattel for coming up with the idea of the Barbie doll. Ryan will always go down in history for being the engineer that copied the body of a Bild Lilli doll for the Barbie doll, and also for his other contributions to designing other parts of Mattel's toys, but that is the beginning and end of his contributions for Mattel. Ryan is no idea man, as Mr. Oppenheimer gives him credit for.
As far as the Barbie doll, little girls in 1959, did not go crazy over the Barbie doll for her figure, as we already had Little Miss Revlon dolls with cute figures and smaller bust lines to play with. Barbie brought with her a wardrobe of clothes, like no other clothes that have been made before or since, that fit the many things she could do in a day. Charlotte Johnson did much more than Jack Ryan, as she actually did create and design the clothes that filled Barbie doll's closet. These clothes were meticulously hand made by Japanese seamstresses- even the pearl necklaces were hand strung. Ruth Handler's ideas made us love Barbie in 1959, the exact same way in which collectors love her today. Barbie was a 3 dimensional paperdoll with a meticulously sewn wardrobe that kept us busy during all our playtime hours. I hope Mr. Oppenheimer researches the past thoroughly before writing his next book, as things he thinks were "made up" in 1991, were actually in print in 1968! This way, the true story of Mattel will not have to be fabricated by a writer who doesn't have a clue because he didn't do his homework!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
18 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Mesmerizing details of America's toy megaseller, and how it grew, February 18, 2009
This review is from: Toy Monster: The Big, Bad World of Mattel (Hardcover)
You don't have to be interested in toys to find this book fascinating. Oppenheimer's study of Mattel offers abundant insights on the habits of corporate America, on one company's stunningly successful marketing, and tales of megalomanic, wack-a-doodle management executives. "Toy Monsters" provides plenty of food for thought--"food" less dangerous than Mattel's Incredible Edibles, an allegedly "sugar-free," additive-packed snack product cooked in molds modeled on the company's successful Creepy Crawler kit. Even though I played with these toys at the homes of friends (some of whom were children of Mattel employees) as a child in the mid-'60s, as a parent it's hard to believe that America's biggest toy company once marketed items using red-hot metal to "cook," unsupervised, either foul-smelling plastic insects, or disgusting "Edibles" (based on Aunt Jemima pancake mix and food coloring) that sickened a number of diabetic children before the toy was discontinued. And unfortunately, that's not Mattel's only dangerous product: the author names several, marketed across decades.
Elliot and Ruth Handler started their company in the mid-'50s with a partner who sold out relatively early on, but they became legendarily famous in 1959 with the introduction of the first incarnation of the Barbie fashion doll. The toy was based on a raunchy German sex mannequin named Bild-Lilli, displayed in a shop window and catching the eye of Ruth Handler's then-15-year-old daughter Barbara, for whom the doll was named. Less than a foot tall, Barbie boasts human-scale measurements of 39-18-34--just the feminine ideal of product manager Jack Ryan (who filed the nipples off Bild-Lilli's mold to better assuage American sensibilities). Ryan, a brilliant, unstable, bi-polar Yalie, burned through five marriages, leading a Hefneresque life while at Mattel, surgically altering several wives to more closely resemble his fantasies. One wife, said to be already stunningly beautiful, died of an anorexia-induced heart attack. Barbie's "boyfriend" was named after the Handlers' only son, Ken. Having an anatomically incorrect doll named after him while an adolescent must have been excruciating for Ken Handler, who would not allow his own children to play with the dolls. Oppenheimer handles the real-life Ken's story briefly and sensitively, noting only "another side" to marriage and parenthood in Ken's life. He died of AIDS in 1994, a story suppressed at the time as well as in his mother's autobiography. Oddly enough, shortly before Ken Handler's death, an "Earring Magic Ken" doll was released, complete with blonde highlights, purple shirt, lavender vest, charm necklace, and "diamond" earring, "giving him the look and feel of the Village People." Even nuttier--and more controversial--was the mid-'70s version of Barbie's nine-inch-high "younger sister," Skipper. "By a crank of her left arm... ["Growing Up"] Skipper sprouted little plastic breasts, her waist became slimmer... the packaging promised she'd grow 'slim and tall and curvy.'" The controversy over this risque 'tween was eclipsed when Ruth Handler was "indicted in 1978 by a federal grand jury on charges of conspiracy, mail fraud, and making false financial statements to the SEC." Her plea of "no contest--equal to a guilty plea" guaranteed Handler immunity from serving a prison term of 20 to 50 years. Her punishment was a slap on the wrist (community service and a fine of $57,000), but it ended her career at Mattel.
Our nation's current economic woes resound with distressing familiarity in Mattel's financial irregularities. In 1969, the Securities and Exchange Commission accused the company of releasing false earnings reports. This turned out to be true, but it's hardly Mattel's only clash with regulations.
"Toy Monster" is not a complete history of Mattel, but one theme that endures, say many former executives, is that the workplace is and was one in which "you had to watch your back. People are pitted against one another... [it's] a shark pond." In addition, executives seemed to endure a remarkable number of personal and/or job-related tragedies: Embittered, they are fired or resign, develop cancer, or watch helplessly as others take credit for their creations. To name just one human example, after Mattel disastrously declined the rights to create Star Wars figures, product designer Jack Sweet came up with the enormously successful He-Man line of action figures. Like others before and after him, Sweet eventually was forced out, "blacklisted" in the toy industry--and ended up driving a forklift for Home Depot AND surviving cancer, knowing that his creations grossed more than $1 billion for Mattel.
In two decades, ambitious Jill Barad rose through the ranks from product manager to CEO. "People who worked with Jill were afraid of her--afraid of disagreeing with her, afraid to say no to her," asserts a former head of worldwide Barbie management. By 1999, fashion-plate Barad was dogged by the company's "worst financial situation in years" and corporate irregularities; Mattel "eventually had to ante up a whopping $122 million to settle shareholder lawsuits for allegedly putting out misleading sales forecasts." Barad left Mattel with close to $50 million, including bonuses, pension, life and health insurance, a forgiven home loan, and 6.4 million stock options, a path that CNN's Stuart Varney called "paved with gold."
Since Barad left, her successor, former Kraft Foods executive Robert A. Eckert, has had to grapple not only with ongoing financial problems and up-and-coming toy competitors, but nagging and tragic safety issues. Mattel manufactures nearly all of its toys in China, and many contractors use lead-contaminated paint. In addition, some Mattel toys, such as the popular Polly Pocket line, contain minuscule magnets that can perforate intestines. At least one child died after ingesting Mattel magnets, and several more suffered agonizing injuries. Oppenheimer also gives an appalling description of our country's nearly toothless toy-safety regulations.
In just 250 pages, Oppenheimer touches on the highlights and lowlights of America's best-known toy company. Still, he's so good at what he does--especially given that Mattel absolutely refused to cooperate with the author in any way--that this book left me wanting more stories (good and bad), more anecdotes (ditto)... I hope other authors will follow the conscientious investigations and interviews that Oppenheimer gives us.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
![[Start the discussion]](http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/x-locale/communities/discussion_boards/start-new-discussion-sec._V192250339_.gif){kind=small}
