|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
1.0 out of 5 stars
Moose tracks are NOT the same as elk/wapiti,
By Mikofox (Whitehorse, Yukon Canada) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Scats and Tracks of Alaska Including the Yukon and British Columbia: A Field Guide to the Signs of Sixty-Nine Wildlife Species (Scats and Tracks Series) (Paperback)
I'm disappointed in this book. Page 127 (moose) shows exactly the same track illustration like the tracks for elk page 133. Moose tracks are larger, with narrower pointed tips, often dewclaw prints showing, where elk tracks are more symmetrically rounded. Errors like this should not happen in a field guide.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very useful,
By
This review is from: Scats and Tracks of Alaska Including the Yukon and British Columbia: A Field Guide to the Signs of Sixty-Nine Wildlife Species (Scats and Tracks Series) (Paperback)
This book was invaluable during our recent inspection of the property we purchased in Alaska. This format is easy to understand and it was easy to identify and differnetiate between the different species of animals inhabiting our land quickly just from scat and tracks. A must have for anyone wanting to live outside the city in Alaska.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Scats and Tracks of Alaska Including the Yukon and British Columbia: A Field Guide to the Signs of Sixty-Nine Wildlife Species (Scats and... by James C. Halfpenny (Paperback - January 1, 2007)
$9.95
In Stock | ||