Frequently Bought Together
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Technical Details
- Read 60 MByte/s, Write 30 MByte/s
- Support high-end DSLR
- Ultra-fast 400X performance with four-channel support
- Low power consumption
- Lifetime Warranty
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Product Description
TRANSCEND 16GB CF Card (400X)
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
82 of 87 people found the following review helpful
Works perfetly in all Canon EOS 7d HD Movie modes. I purchased two of them along with my 7d and have just ordered a 32 GB Transcend to extend HD movie capacity from 48 min with this 16 GB to 96 min.
May 2011 Update: While this 400x Transcend continues to work perfectly with my 7d under almost all conditions, I have recently found one condition where the faster 600x Transcend MIGHT make a very modest difference. When you are shooting RAW at 8 frames per second with this 400x, the camera slows down to about 1 frame per second after the buffer is full -- about 16 shots. This would also happen at 600x, but I dont know how much it would improve. I just performed an experiment with my 32 GB 400x Transcend/7D and got the following number of shots off in five seconds:
1. Large JPG only: 39 shots (buffer never overloads).
2. Large RAW only: 23 shots (slows down after 16 shots). *
3. Large RAW plus Large JPG: 17 shots. (slows down after 7 shots) *
In summary, there is no reason for 7D owners to spend the big bucks to go from 400x to 600x for video and probably no significant improvement even for 8fps RAW. Check out the table on page 59 of your EOS 7D Instruction Manual and do the math for yourself. High speed (8fps) RAW generates about 200MB/s while the 400x cards and 600x cards handle only 60MB/s and 90MB/s respectively. Also note than if you are shooting RAW + JPEG, you can more than double your burst length by going to RAW only and converting later. Burst capability is therefore much more about the camera's buffer size and processing speed than about card speed. I have concluded that this 400X Transcend is the one for me and find no reason to spend more. If you are a 7D/600x owner who wishes to repeat this test with a 600x Transcend, I would greatly appreciate your reply to this post. For me, it would be an expensive experiment.
* Updated 8-4-2011, Note that this was for the 32GB card, the 16GB card might produce slightly different results.
May 2011 Update: While this 400x Transcend continues to work perfectly with my 7d under almost all conditions, I have recently found one condition where the faster 600x Transcend MIGHT make a very modest difference. When you are shooting RAW at 8 frames per second with this 400x, the camera slows down to about 1 frame per second after the buffer is full -- about 16 shots. This would also happen at 600x, but I dont know how much it would improve. I just performed an experiment with my 32 GB 400x Transcend/7D and got the following number of shots off in five seconds:
1. Large JPG only: 39 shots (buffer never overloads).
2. Large RAW only: 23 shots (slows down after 16 shots). *
3. Large RAW plus Large JPG: 17 shots. (slows down after 7 shots) *
In summary, there is no reason for 7D owners to spend the big bucks to go from 400x to 600x for video and probably no significant improvement even for 8fps RAW. Check out the table on page 59 of your EOS 7D Instruction Manual and do the math for yourself. High speed (8fps) RAW generates about 200MB/s while the 400x cards and 600x cards handle only 60MB/s and 90MB/s respectively. Also note than if you are shooting RAW + JPEG, you can more than double your burst length by going to RAW only and converting later. Burst capability is therefore much more about the camera's buffer size and processing speed than about card speed. I have concluded that this 400X Transcend is the one for me and find no reason to spend more. If you are a 7D/600x owner who wishes to repeat this test with a 600x Transcend, I would greatly appreciate your reply to this post. For me, it would be an expensive experiment.
* Updated 8-4-2011, Note that this was for the 32GB card, the 16GB card might produce slightly different results.
48 of 51 people found the following review helpful
Amazon Verified Purchase
While searching for a CF card for my new camera, I didn't find many specific card results. So if you are using a Nikon D300s, this review is for you.
This card works great in my Nikon D300s. Here are my results at 7 frames per second:
RAW-12 BIT - Buffer show 17 frames but shoots 25 frames before buffer fills. Pause for about one second and can shoot for about 5 shots. Pause for 3 seconds and can shoot for 16 before buffer fills. Capacity shows 770 shots available but goes over 800.
JPEG-Large-Fine - Buffer shows 21 but never fills and will shoot at 7fps up to the Nikon limit of 100 shots. It goes down to about 7 or 8 in the buffer but never slows down.
Capacity shows 1400 (1.4K) photos available. I don't shoot JPEG much so I don't know the actual totals. 1400+ is a lot for one card.
I consider myself a serious amateur photographer and this card fulfills all my needs. My photography is mostly HDR, landscapes, and my kids (both at home and playing sports).
Unless you need to shoot in RAW 25+ photos at 7fps consistently, this is a great card for the money. If you shoot JPEG, it will work as fast as the camera.
I purchased this 16GB card for the same price as the Sandisk 8GB card. So for the price of a Sandisk 16GB card, I bought two Transcend 16GB cards. Until this card, I always shot with Sandisk Extremes III sdhc cards.
Shipped fast with Prime.
I will update here if I have any issues.
This card works great in my Nikon D300s. Here are my results at 7 frames per second:
RAW-12 BIT - Buffer show 17 frames but shoots 25 frames before buffer fills. Pause for about one second and can shoot for about 5 shots. Pause for 3 seconds and can shoot for 16 before buffer fills. Capacity shows 770 shots available but goes over 800.
JPEG-Large-Fine - Buffer shows 21 but never fills and will shoot at 7fps up to the Nikon limit of 100 shots. It goes down to about 7 or 8 in the buffer but never slows down.
Capacity shows 1400 (1.4K) photos available. I don't shoot JPEG much so I don't know the actual totals. 1400+ is a lot for one card.
I consider myself a serious amateur photographer and this card fulfills all my needs. My photography is mostly HDR, landscapes, and my kids (both at home and playing sports).
Unless you need to shoot in RAW 25+ photos at 7fps consistently, this is a great card for the money. If you shoot JPEG, it will work as fast as the camera.
I purchased this 16GB card for the same price as the Sandisk 8GB card. So for the price of a Sandisk 16GB card, I bought two Transcend 16GB cards. Until this card, I always shot with Sandisk Extremes III sdhc cards.
Shipped fast with Prime.
I will update here if I have any issues.
57 of 66 people found the following review helpful
Amazon Verified Purchase
One minute, I was looking through images from a very important shoot on the back of my 7D and patting myself on the back.
The next minute, after turning off the camera and putting the card in my card reader, I couldn't see anything in Finder.
I turned on PhotoRec and tried to bring the card up. It told me that the card was 31.5 MB, not 16 GB. I tried a couple of other software packages with no luck.
I consulted a forensic expert (seriously, he had a ridiculous, proprietary, homemade card-scanning machine, and does lots of work with data recovery for the legal field) who ended up using a dummy card to bypass this card's controller. He told me that all of the memory on this card contained zeros. And that somehow, this card's firmware was incorrectly reporting itself.
My client's photos can never, ever be recovered. Ever. And this is probably because someone at Transcend wanted to save $5 on this card and bought cheaper, less reliable memory chips than they should have.
I've had no response from Transcend tech support after several days and am never buying one of their products again, even if it's $30 cheaper than the Sandisk version. Even if it's $200 cheaper than the Sandisk version, for that matter.
Don't buy this card! Don't buy anything from this company! And feel free to e-mail me to confirm that I don't work or consult for anyone in the electronics industry. We can even meet for coffee and maybe draw pictures of Transcend CompactFlash cards with crayons and then rip them into tiny shreds.
Cheap memory cards are cheap because margins are cut. And these are not margins that you want cut when it comes to crucial images for your clients.
The next minute, after turning off the camera and putting the card in my card reader, I couldn't see anything in Finder.
I turned on PhotoRec and tried to bring the card up. It told me that the card was 31.5 MB, not 16 GB. I tried a couple of other software packages with no luck.
I consulted a forensic expert (seriously, he had a ridiculous, proprietary, homemade card-scanning machine, and does lots of work with data recovery for the legal field) who ended up using a dummy card to bypass this card's controller. He told me that all of the memory on this card contained zeros. And that somehow, this card's firmware was incorrectly reporting itself.
My client's photos can never, ever be recovered. Ever. And this is probably because someone at Transcend wanted to save $5 on this card and bought cheaper, less reliable memory chips than they should have.
I've had no response from Transcend tech support after several days and am never buying one of their products again, even if it's $30 cheaper than the Sandisk version. Even if it's $200 cheaper than the Sandisk version, for that matter.
Don't buy this card! Don't buy anything from this company! And feel free to e-mail me to confirm that I don't work or consult for anyone in the electronics industry. We can even meet for coffee and maybe draw pictures of Transcend CompactFlash cards with crayons and then rip them into tiny shreds.
Cheap memory cards are cheap because margins are cut. And these are not margins that you want cut when it comes to crucial images for your clients.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
not as fast as i hoped
90 files CR2 25MB/file & 2x300MB .mov
using USB 2 kingston fcr-hs219: read avg 27MB/s
using USB 3 delkin DDREADER-42: read avg 27MB/s, write 17MB/s... Read more
using USB 2 kingston fcr-hs219: read avg 27MB/s
using USB 3 delkin DDREADER-42: read avg 27MB/s, write 17MB/s... Read more
Published 1 month ago by Peet Peet
Worked fine for several months, then became corrupted
This was my third Transcend CF 16GB 400x CF card, the first two had been reliable and problem free so I bought a third. Read more
Published 1 month ago by SZ
Corrupt RAW images after 1 week of use
I purchased this 16GB 400x card on the recommendation of another photographer who has used this brand for years. Read more
Published 5 months ago by J. L. burnett
Great card for the money
I have had one of these cards for about 2 years. I started with it in my Canon 40D and moved it to my 7D. Read more
Published 5 months ago by MI Photographer
It works perfectly, costs less
I shoot professionally, so was wary of buying an unknown brand. So I used this card on private shoots until I was convinced it was okay. Read more
Published 6 months ago by James Bass
Trascend Flash Memory
I received this product on time, and it was exactly what I orders. It works great in my Canon 7D DSLR camera
Published 6 months ago by Patrick Font
great card
I bought four of these. Great storage. No problems so far. It just works. Great price for the speed. 400X!!!!
Published 7 months ago by Rommel
New compact flash
Great card! fast in the camera, and fast to download. Only a couple thousand photos so far, but completely reliable.
Published 8 months ago by Robert L. Wilbourn
Warning: This Card WILL Fail
Not even a year since I bought this card and it's already corrupt. After transferring my photos onto my computer, I would always insert the card back into the camera and format... Read more
Published 9 months ago by Pigsty
good performance.. upbeatable price
I bought two. I'm an amateur photographer, I own a 5DMKII so I need the extra capacity. I used it during a recent trip to Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet and China, and during the 36 days... Read more
Published 10 months ago by Mansour Alqabandi
Related Items
- Most Popular
- Camera Batteries & Chargers
- Digital SLR Cameras
- Camera & Photo Filters
- Camera Cases & Bags
- Computer Memory Card Readers
- Camcorder & Camera Lenses
- Camera Lens Hoods
- Camera & Photo Lighting
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
