Before reviewing the latest Paul Auster novel, I'd like to point out a few things: I am a huge Auster fan. First, I saw Smoke, the movie, and even though I hate cigarretes, I found it simply beautiful. After that, I read The New York Trilogy and The music of chance. It's hard to describe these novels. While reading them, I felt like they were burning my hands, but I couldn't stop reading them. Late at night, when I could barely see, I kept telling to myself, one more chapter, another chapter, just a few more pages. Then I realized that the end was close, so finished them in less then two days. The music of chance was so hypnotic, that even if I had to walk some where, I would read while I was walking. That's the spell that these two novels pulled on me.
Now, I few years later, I went full circle. I read every single novel Auster wrote, so you can consider me a PaulAusterologist. Although I read a lot, Auster is the only author, prolific author (more than 7 novels) of which I read his whole work (novels) What did I found in this journey? He is very reiterative, very very. Most of his characters are some how in the writing business, if not writers. As he is. They went to Columbia. As he did. They speak french. As he does. They are avid readers. As he is. Of course that this happens with many writers, but this is maybe too much. Also, you always find the idea that little events, little decisions we make, can reshape our life in a blink. Last but not least, his characters are always commited to major tasks. Things that only they understand, but some how will be very important. Things that for unknown reasons, they must do. This is Paul Auster's world. And he is running out of ideas.
What about Travels in the scriptorium? Well, basically Auster is being visited by his characters. They are angry, yet they care for him. The question is, after he did so many things to them, sent them to so many dangerous places, made them do so many twisted things, what do they feel about him, what would they do to him if they have a chance? That's a question many writers ask themselves, but turning it in to a novel? I don't know... looks lazy to me, specially after producing so many similar pieces lately.
Finally, Auster is human as we are. That means that he is obsessed and haunted by certain questions just as we are. These questions will be after us our whole life, yes, but if you are a writer, you must try to write something new and not the same novel over and over.
A few years ago, I saw a García Márquez interview. He said that after One hundred years of solitude, that kind of writing, the themes, the structure, the universe and the type of characters, were so deep in him, that he could have written the same book, slightly changed, over and over for many years. But he didn't. Instead, he stopped writing. He took a break. He took many years. And then, only then, when he finally got rid of the One hundred years of solitude universe, he produced a different book, completely fresh. I think that Auster should do the same.