1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An informed, balanced, and useful volume on Israelite wisdom literature, January 31, 2011
The wisdom literature of the Old Testament is an engaging and important aspect of Old Testament studies, yet one that is not always well understood or fully appreciated. Roland E. Murphy, a Catholic scholar who has devoted his life to the study and exposition of that wisdom literature, has provided an informed, balanced, and useful volume that summarizes the results of that lifetime of study. The third edition is an expansion in the form of an added supplement, the Millennium Supplement, which interacts with developments in the field of wisdom scholarship since the publication of the two previous editions. The aim of his study is to survey the biblical quest for wisdom, what that quest entails, and how the wisdom literature is a part of and converses with the rest of the Old Testament (x).
Murphy's book is organized into nine chapters. The first chapter is an introduction, which treats preliminary issues such as classifying wisdom literature, identifying the biblical books that belong to that class, speculating on the identity of the Israelite sages, and discerning the language and literary forms the wisdom writers employed. The next five chapters examine the biblical wisdom books themselves: Proverbs, Job, Qoheleth, Sirach, and the Wisdom of Solomon. The latter two wisdom books are deuterocanonical, and scholars can appreciate Murphy's Catholic perspective, which enables him to include these books that make a valuable contribution to Israelite wisdom. The seventh chapter is an investigation of supposed wisdom influence on other Old Testament literature. The eighth chapter considers the theological message of the wisdom literature and how it relates to the deuteronomistic and prophetic corpora of the Old Testament. The last chapter is an analysis of Lady Wisdom, her literary characteristics, her theological import, and her identity as female. An appendix on Egyptian, Mesopotamian, and Hellenistic wisdoms and their influence on the biblical wisdom literature completes the main text, while the two supplements, designed for advanced students and scholars, engage more recent and technical discussion on wisdom studies. Overall, the book is well written and lucid, and Murphy tries to expound the Israelite wisdom as candidly and thoughtfully as possible.
His introduction makes clear that biblical wisdom literature should be limited to Proverbs, Job, Qoheleth, Sirach, and the Wisdom of Solomon. He postpones detailed discussion of wisdom influence on other Old Testament passages until chapter seven. He highlights the crucial fact that Israelite wisdom literature is concerned with what it means to be a human being in general. Therefore, one should not be surprised by the absence of distinctively Jewish themes, such as covenant, cult, and promises (1). While acknowledging the existence of sages in Israel and their role in the formulation and transmission of the wisdom tradition, Murphy cautions that the wisdom books themselves provide little information about the sages and that wisdom was also communicated in the context of family and the immediate community (3-5). Whether a professional class of sages or the core family unit was the more likely context for the development of wisdom tradition, nevertheless wisdom took on and was dressed in various structures and forms, examples of the former being parallelism and paronomasia, and examples of the latter being the saying and the admonition. On how to interpret wisdom - especially proverbs - Murphy offers two apt observations. First, proverbs were not mechanistic formulae for the working of the universe, i.e. they did not constitute a rigid and inflexible retributive theology. Therefore, each statement is not absolute truth; it is only relative (11). Second, and perhaps helping to explain the first, wisdom took account of and ultimately recognized the mysterious working of God, the fear of whom was the foundation of any true pursuit of wisdom (11).
Although there are only five wisdom books properly, Murphy is aware of and interacts with scholarship that looks for wisdom 'echoes' elsewhere in the Old Testament; and though he does not entirely dismiss the search for wisdom influence (see 107-108), he does encourage a careful and judicious approach. The main problem with discerning wisdom influence is the lack of methodological precision for what constitutes influence. Murphy delineates the three typical criteria scholars use to adduce influence (vocabulary, literary forms, and content) and says that even the presence of all three cannot demonstrate conclusively wisdom influence. The reason is that the sages did not have a monopoly on wisdom themes and literary forms; otherwise, their language would be jargon and unintelligible to common people (100). Murphy critiques the claims of wisdom influence in the Psalms, Deuteronomy, and Song of Songs. He believes that the clearest demonstration of wisdom influence is in certain Psalms - specifically 1, 32, 34, 37, 49, 112, and 128 (103). He also accepts that wisdom tradition may have influenced certain prophetic sayings, such as Isaiah 28.23-29 (100).
Whether one can attribute explicit wisdom influence to various parts of the Old Testament, one can nevertheless affirm with confidence that wisdom permeates the Old Testament and therefore must be a more integral element of its holistic theology than scholars have acknowledged until now. Murphy is not advocating a systematized biblical theology, as though there were a center of biblical theology (he does not believe there is one). Instead, he is saying that any biblical theology seeking to be faithful to the Old Testament itself must incorporate the wisdom literature and its tradition as a central part of the biblical witness and not as a peripheral one (112). Murphy lists four theological perspectives that wisdom offers: an understanding of reality, a search for order, creation theology, and the wisdom experience (112). He emphasizes that wisdom does not view reality ahistorically and that consequently it recognizes an organic relationship between people and the world. Yet it also takes account of the mysterious working of God, so that it can affirm on the one hand human free will and on the other the ultimate causality that is God (114). Murphy is skeptical that Israelite wisdom was, at its core, a search for order, like the Egyptian concept of ma`at (115-116). Instead, wisdom was about a dynamic relationship with the one God, who created the cosmos, imbued it with his presence and values, and who made human beings to fulfill their potential in sole orientation to God (120) Thus, the creation is as much a means of God's revelation as the Sinai covenant (122).
In his last chapter - that on Lady Wisdom - Murphy focuses on this literary character as a personification of wisdom. He doubts that she was a hypostasis in the later Hellenistic sense but rather thinks she was an integral part of God himself, an extension or communication of God (133). Lady Wisdom is intriguing because, on the one hand, she engages human beings to come to her, listen to her, and embrace her; on the other hand, she is a gift to be received from God. In fact, Murphy calls attention to several texts (notably Job 28 and Proverbs 8) that talk about how wisdom is inaccessible to humans and how only God knows where wisdom is located, with the result that only God can reveal her. When God grants wisdom to his people, what he grants to them is himself (147). This tension highlights the human and divine aspects that characterize the mystery of wisdom.
The prolegomena to wisdom studies and the theological nature of wisdom serve as the bookends for Murphy's book. In between are his analysis of the wisdom books proper, and again he detects a tension in the biblical witness. While Proverbs has a rather optimistic retributive theology, Murphy sees Job and Qoheleth as nuancing that perspective, as genuine questioning that is able to be part of Israel's faith (34). He sees Sirach as a traditionalist whose contribution consists in equating wisdom with the Torah, and he perceives thorough Hellenistic influence on the Wisdom of Solomon, which gives a perspective from the Diaspora. Murphy says that the Wisdom of Solomon teaches immortality, but he qualifies that assertion by saying that the author does not see immortality as a natural property of human beings, but as a gift received in relationship with God (86). Also, in regard to the connection between Proverbs and the Teaching of Amenemope, Murphy states that direct literary dependence, while possible, does not need to be maintained, as the Israelite writer shows his independence and the connection can be explained by the way in which ideas become common currency (24). As for the historicity of Job, Murphy prefers to see the story as legend, not history, and he thinks the speeches are polished literary accomplishments, not anything actually spoken by historical persons (35).
The structure of Murphy's book is both distracting yet helpful. The book would have been a more fluid read if Murphy had rewritten the book and wove into the fabric of each chapter material from the supplements. Such a re-working would also minimize the need to turn back and forth between pages. On the other hand, as Thomas Renz and Stephen Garfinkel observe, this structure allows the main text to focus on the elementary and principal issues, an approach that preserves readability for the student or intelligent lay-reader. The supplements, then, provide interested and able students, as well as scholars, with a more technical treatment.
Some reviewers, such as David Penchansky, disagree with Murphy's insistence that the biblical material should have a univocal witness, contending that Murphy does not allow for ideological perspectives of the text that cannot be harmonized or reconciled. Murphy does see...
Read more ›
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No