7 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Does Circumstantial Evidence Alone Imply Conspiracy?, September 18, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: Trilaterals Over America (Paperback)
This book relies heavily on rhetoric, question begging, circumstantial evidence and conjecture. It argues from a conclusion - namely that there is some grand Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) / Trilateral Commission (TC) conspiracy/plot; and then seeks to make the data confirm to that foregone conclusion.
The book certainly puts forth an interest theory; and I give the author credit for the imaginative ways he makes the data seemingly correlate with his hypothesis. But one is reminded of the old adage - figures don't lie, but liars figure. And that correlation does not imply causation.
I'm not suggesting that the author is necessarily lying. But I do think he combined and presented circumstantial evidence in ways that only beg the question about a CFR/TC conspiracy. If I were a juror, I would have to vote to acquit due to a lack of any real hard evidence.
If you already have your mind made up about a CFR/TC conspiracy, this book will tell you what you want to hear. If your mind is not already made up, I doubt very much that this book will persuade you to agree with the author's presuppositions.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No