7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
best education book in ages, February 19, 2008
This review is from: Troublemaker: A Personal History of School Reform since Sputnik (Hardcover)
This is much the best education book I've read in ages, a delightful blend of history, autobiography, humor and policy talk. Though often called a conservative, the author turns out to be more of a radical, a family man, a goodhearted (and sometimes frustrated) father and grandfather, and a genuine human being. He has penned a balanced, thoroughly readable (and sometimes laugh-out-loud amusing)account of major developments in American primary-secondary education over the past half century or so, intertwined with his own life and work in this field. You won't encounter a clearer recounting of U.S. school reform efforts--or a more enjoyable book on the subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Overly Bullish on American Education, June 13, 2008
This review is from: Troublemaker: A Personal History of School Reform since Sputnik (Hardcover)
"Troublemaker" tells the story of Chester Finn's journey through American education - from young student to teacher, from graduate student to professor, from one reform position he held to another, and through the sometimes frustrating process of attempting to obtain the best education for his children and grand-children. At the same time, "Troublemaker" is also primarily a recounting of the never-ending efforts at reforming (improving?) public education.
Early in the book Finn briefly recounts the 1966 Coleman Report findings - that student achievement varied as much within schools as between, and that school differences were far less consequential than people had long assumed. This news came shortly after SAT scores peaked in 1964. Nonetheless, Americans in ever-increasing numbers believe that "more money" for schools can solve our lagging international pupil achievement problem - eg. the 6/13/08 "USAToday" reports 32% in 1965 believed schools needed more money, vs. 57% today.
Between those years we have heralded the implementation of bilingual education, gender equality in college sports, affirmative action, busing, special education, equity of funding, increased teacher union membership and militancy (attain improved salaries, protection from urban community conflicts), school choice and vouchers, a federal Department of Education, multiculturalism, ethnic and gender studies, child-centered learning, "professionalism" of teachers (putting them in charge, vs. elected officials), values-free education, back to basics, core-knowledge curriculum (knowledge builds upon knowledge), high-stakes testing manipulation of tests, phonics vs. whole language, thinking mathematically vs. accurate methodology and results, a more than doubling of per-pupil inflation-adjusted spending, "No Child Left Behind," etc. Meanwhile, 17-year-old NAEP pupil achievement scores have remained virtually unchanged, and we still lag most other developed nations.
The good news is that a few stars have shown brightly during this period - eg. Community School District #4 in New York City, Prince George's County Schools in Maryland, Jaime Escalante in L.A., and the Houston public schools under Dr. Paige. Mr. Escalante became frustrated with roadblocks and opposition, and quit, Houston's achievements turned out to be largely fraudulent, and the innovators at Community School District #4 and Prince George's County have mvoed on and faded from the memory of most. Nonetheless, Dr. Finn remains bullish.
"Troublemaker" would benefit considerably if Dr. Finn had also addressed the transitory nature of these successes, the resiliency of the status quo, as well as the generally poor quality of education research (lack of proper statistical controls, confusing operational with statistical significance), and the system's failure to sustain improvements - eg. Head Start, earlier grade-level improvements.
Finally, Dr. Finn shortchanges Coleman's findings and fails to adequately address the potential for pupil achievement via increased parental and pupil motivation. The continued examples of "over-achieving" Asian and Jewish pupils within the U.S. are not to be ignored. They mirror the "secrets" of Asian households revealed by Dr. Stevenson at the U. of Michigan and hold the secret for widespread significant and sustained improvement in America.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Educator's Perspective, July 13, 2009
This review is from: Troublemaker: A Personal History of School Reform since Sputnik (Hardcover)
This is a remarkable book, not only for it's history of educational reform, but for it's insider perspective of the interplay of politics and culture on education. As an educator who attended school through the '50's and '60's and taught school beginning in the 70's, this book represents a "living history" that parallels what I, and many others, were doing "in the trenches."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
