| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Non-Indian Critics and Readers Will Want to Read This,
By
This review is from: The Turn to the Native: Studies in Criticism and Culture (Paperback)
Arnold Krupats The Turn to the Native is a unique bit of literary criticism. One of the few studies of American Indian (or Indian, to use Sherman Alexies preferred term) literature, aside from Ruoffs American Indian Literatures and Graulichs Yellow Woman, featuring Leslie Marmon Silko, Krupats book examines major themes of Indian literature as well as the role of the non-Indian when reading Indian books.The Turn to the Native, while it serves as a nice overview of major themes, especially post-Colonialism and the ideologies through which Westerners always tend to view Indian literature, concerns itself largely with Gerald Vizenor and his Heirs of Columbus (two out of the four criticism chapters are devoted to Vizenor, and a full one of them is devoted to Heirs.) Krupat identifies some of the Sartrian influences (and refutations thereof) in Heirs, while placing the book squarely in the larger context of postcolonial literature and literary theory as a whole. But the main theme of the book is IDENTITY, which he fully explores in the last (and byfar the longest) chapter, A Nice Jewish Boy Among the Indians. While obstinately about the role of the non-Indian reader in general (and the non-Indian critic in particular) in exploring and reading Indian literature, it really serves as a model for later criticisms of Indian work (and, Ill admit, it helped me in my own journey into this subject far more than traditional criticism ever did). Told in the form of a story (what else?), it tells Krupats story as a Jewish-American immigrant and the offspring of Holocaust survivors, who share quite a bit in common with the Indians who, in their own way, are survivors of a different kind of Holocaust. From that basis, Krupat manages to make several statements about the role of non-Indian critics (shaky at best) and non-Indian readers (sorry, you just wont get all of it). As a non-Indian, it was refreshing to read, and it helped me immensely in organizing my thoughts about Indian literature and my place as a twinkie in it. Essential reading for anyone doing scholarly work in Native American or Indian literature. Makes an excellent companion piece to The Heirs of Columbus.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |